Watch Now

$26.5 million ‘nuclear verdict’ stands in fatal Oregon road-rage crash

An Oregon jury smacked Horizon Transport with a $26.5 million judgment in a fatal road-rage crash. Photo: Horizon Transport

Smacked with a $26.5 million jury award nearly a year ago in a lawsuit stemming from a fatal road-rage crash, Horizon Transport of Wakarusa, Indiana, has failed in its appeal to have the amount lowered.

The case was recently resolved with the verdict intact through a voluntary mediation program offered by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.

“The case has been settled on terms mutually agreeable to everyone,” R. Daniel Lindahl of Bullivant Houser Bailey PC told FreightWaves. He was among the attorneys representing Horizon Transport in the appeals process.

An Oregon jury awarded the “nuclear verdict” against Horizon Transport and another trucking company, Smoot Brothers Transportation, headquartered in Brigham City, Utah, in May 2019. The jury found that the drivers for the two companies had been engaged in a cat-and-mouse game for nearly 100 miles along U.S. Highway 20 prior to the fatal crash that killed Sara Allison and severely injured her husband, Matthew, of Boise, Idaho, on June 5, 2016, near Burns, Oregon.

However, prior to that verdict, Smoot Brothers reached a $900,000 secret “Mary Carter” settlement agreement with Sara Allison’s estate, which the jury wasn’t aware of when awarding damages, which left Horizon Transport on the hook for the bulk of the $26.5 million verdict.

“A Mary Carter agreement is [an] arrangement whereby the settling defendant nevertheless goes to trial, but the liability of the settling defendant is limited,” according to the American Bar Association.

Horizon attorneys appealed, but U.S. Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan declined to reduce the jury award and refused to grant a new trial in the road-rage crash.

Tom D’Amore, principal of the D’Amore Law Group in Portland, Oregon, who represented Matthew Allison in the lawsuit against Horizon and Smoot Brothers, said his client is relieved the case is finally over. 

“He really suffered during this whole process,” D’Amore told FreightWaves. “Matt’s out there somewhere in Utah or Idaho, just being a regular guy. He wants to be a loner and doesn’t even want us to really know where he’s at.”

The fatal crash

According to court documents, Sara Allison was driving east on U.S. 20 when she crashed head-on with a truck driven by James Decou, who drove for Smoot Brothers.

Decou and two other Smoot Brothers drivers, Peter Barnes and Cory Frew, were headed from Salt Lake City to Eugene, Oregon, when they encountered CDL-holder Jonathan Hogaboom, who was driving a 45-foot-long luxury motorhome for Horizon to its new owner in Oregon.

Court records alleged that Hogaboom cut off Barnes on a stretch of highway near Mountain Home, Idaho, which resulted in a 100-mile game of cat-and-mouse as all of the commercial truck drivers were driving aggressively, cutting each other off and brake checking each other prior to the crash.

Just before the crash, Decou attempted to pass the RV driven by Hogaboom in a no-passing zone.

After being alerted to the oncoming car driven by Sara Allison, Decou tried to return to his legal lane, but court reports claimed that Hogaboom sped up or slowed down and refused to allow Decou’s truck “to pass or otherwise return to the westbound lane.”

Decou and Hogaboom were in adjacent lanes when they reached a blind turn.

In an effort to avoid hitting the tractor-trailer heading toward them in the wrong lane, Sara Allison swerved to the right at the same time Decou swerved, hitting the Allisons’ vehicle head-on, killing her, and severely injuring her husband.

Following the crash, Decou pleaded guilty to second-degree manslaughter and was sentenced to six years in prison in Oregon. The other drivers were not charged.

Smoot driver James Decou was sentenced to six years in prison in road-rage crash that killed Sara Allison.
Photo: Smoot Brothers

What needs to happen?

In recent years, nuclear verdicts, described as jury awards in which penalties exceed $10 million, have been assessed against several trucking companies.

“Whenever you see a big verdict like this, trucking companies need to start asking the big questions, like what did the insurance company do afterward?” D’Amore told FreightWaves.

“Once the incident is over with, it’s kind of out of the hands of the trucking company,” he said. “Insurance companies want to take a risk that they can settle the case for 10 cents on the dollar or take it to trial and get lucky, or that the attorney will screw up. I would say in 90% of these cases, they could settle them for a lot less, but they just don’t want to — they want to take a risk and a lot of times they take a risk and they win.” 

There have been numerous road-rage incidents involving commercial vehicles on U.S. roadways in recent years. However, D’Amore said commercial drivers should know better.

“They get caught up in a road-rage issue, but they are also driving an 80,000-pound vehicle,” he said. “I think companies need to provide more training to teach drivers how to react to these types of situations or they need to get them off the road.”

Call for tort reform

In his nearly 30 years as an attorney, Lindahl said, there have been calls for tort reform, which is an ongoing debate among all of the stakeholders, including “the people who get sued and the people who file suits.”

“I don’t ultimately know how it gets resolved, but these large verdicts are a real concern obviously because they can put a company out of business,” Lindahl told FreightWaves. “However, it’s the nature of litigation these days and it’s a risk of litigating cases.”

Trucking companies should make sure they have adequate liability insurance, he said.

“These kinds of things [nuclear verdicts] can happen and do happen, and companies need to take precautions to be prepared in the event that something unfortunate occurs,” Lindahl said. “These extraordinary verdicts are an ongoing debate all across the country.”

Read more articles by FreightWaves’ Clarissa Hawes


  1. Philip L Schwigel

    Cat & Mouse game of cutting each other off? If we as Americans allow this kind of behavior on our highways, than nobody is safe. The problem lies with the plea deals. Everybody thinks they deserve the right to barter their own sentence. WTF people. So know we say all those involved are innocent of any wrong doing except of course the one that hit the Allison Family head on. As far as the Insurance Company is concerned, it is too bad that Matthew survived. By all accounts he should have been killed right along with his wife, than we wouldn’t have the law suit issues we are involved in. Maybe they ought to try suing the Doctors that saved his life. See where we are going with it. No justice what so ever. 6 years for playing cat & mouse cut off on a public highway that ends up killing an innocent motorist, & the other drivers involved are completely set free. Will they do it again? Sure as hell they will. Why not? The fact that the lawyers all quietly convene to barter down a judgement is ridiculous. how can you play “Let’s Make A Deal” when the trump card has already been played. For the court to allow a Mary Carter judgment for one trucking company & not the other shows prejudice. Poor Matthew is the only one with sound enough judgement to say leave me alone, let me be. Everyone of the drivers involved should have been executed, but that’s just my opinion. I do drive a truck for a living. I have seen this type of stuff going on all over the country. It needs to stop. Until the system finally says enough, & terminates those who take life lightly enough to play daring games on public roads which risk the lives of other innocent motorists, we will continue to see the games.

    1. Bill Sinden

      Yep, all they had to do is pull over and cool down then write it off as just another idiot you’ve dealt with today! The awards in the USA are usually astronomical and make no sense at all sometimes where they come up with those numbers$$$$?? Although, there may be life time care for the seriously injured parties and other needs?

      1. Larry M.

        Someone died, how does one put a value on a life? Loss of a loved one, loss of possible family, emotional loss that never goes away, all of these things factor into these huge verdicts in cases like this. How do you put a value on any of that?

      2. B.A.

        I wonder if you would say, it “make no sense at all sometimes where they come up with those numbers$$$$??” if your mother, sister, or wife was the one that was killed in that stupid accident?

  2. Bill Tobey

    ““They get caught up in a road-rage issue, but they are also driving an 80,000-pound vehicle,” he said. “I think companies need to provide more training to teach drivers how to react to these types of situations or they need to get them off the road.” ”

    The industry pressures drivers far too much, and pays far too little to expect any training to make a difference. The hourly rate to drive truck is disgusting.

    While there are many good professional drivers out there driving truck is a highly regulated job and too many new drivers just don’t have the experience to pilot an 80,000 pound truck. Licensing needs to be graduated, 2 axle, 3 axle, articulated, unlimited.

    We think hours of service is the answer, no hours od service just regulates the dispatchers. The most frustrating thing I found was driving within an hours of service restriction which only frustrated and tired me. As well as drivers, disptchers should be regulated and monitored.

    The Mary Carter thing should be abolished. Juries should also decide on the split, negligence, proportion when setting the penalty.

Comments are closed.

Clarissa Hawes

Clarissa has covered all aspects of the trucking industry for 14 years. She is an award-winning journalist known for her investigative and business reporting. Before joining FreightWaves, she wrote for Land Line Magazine and If you have a news tip or story idea, send her an email to [email protected].