Buffett: Berkshire will not bid for CSX or Norfolk Southern

BNSF parent seeks alliance, not merger

CSX, BNSF, and Pan Am Railways power lead a Pan Am Southern unit grain train en route to Ayer, Mass., on Pan Am's freight main in former B&M territory, at Wendell, Mass., on Aug. 16, 2017. (Photo: Trains/Scott A. Hartley)
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • Berkshire Hathaway's BNSF Railway will not bid for CSX, opting instead to pursue closer operational partnerships for growth synergies.
  • BNSF and CSX announced increased interline intermodal service, connecting California/Southwest with the Southeast, and Kansas City with East Coast ports.
  • BNSF believes that further rail mergers are unlikely due to lack of customer and stakeholder support, contradicting earlier market expectations.
  • Berkshire Hathaway's decision comes in response to Union Pacific's acquisition of Norfolk Southern, a deal subject to stricter regulatory review.
See a mistake? Contact us.

BNSF Railway wants to date CSX — but has no interest in getting married.

Five days after Union Pacific (NYSE: UNP) announced its $85 billion deal to acquire Norfolk Southern (NYSE: NSC), Berkshire Hathaway Chairman Warren Buffett and Chief Executive-designate Greg Abel told CSX CEO Joe Hinrichs that they would not bid for the Eastern railroad.

Rather, Buffett told CNBC in an interview Monday, Berkshire (NYSE: BRK-B) believes that its BNSF Railway should forge closer ties with CSX (NASDAQ: CSX) to gain growth synergies without the expense and regulatory risk of a merger.

Buffett also told CNBC that Berkshire would not launch a competing bid for Norfolk Southern.

CSX stock fell 5% after the cable network’s report. Wall Street analysts and industry observers have expected that BNSF would seek to acquire CSX as a competitive response to the UP-NS merger.

Buffett and Abel met with Hinrichs on Aug. 3 in Omaha, Berkshire’s hometown. Omaha-based UP and NS on July 29 announced their deal to create the first U.S. transcontinental railroad.

BNSF and CSX on Friday said that they would launch more interline intermodal service linking California and the southwest with points on CSX in the southeast. The railroads also will offer international intermodal service connecting Kansas City with the ports of New York/New Jersey and Virginia.

Earlier this year, amid merger talk from UP CEO Jim Vena, BNSF said it did not see the catalyst for a megamerger involving Class I railroads.

“For a merger to happen in today’s environment, our customers, policymakers, and the communities we serve would need to indicate that they want to see additional mergers,” BNSF spokesman Zak Andersen said in May. “We view it as unlikely as we aren’t hearing from our customers or the other constituencies that they want to see further consolidation in the industry at this point in time.”

Until Buffett’s remarks today, neither BNSF nor Berkshire had commented on the UP-NS deal.

The UP-NS merger will be the first to be judged under the Surface Transportation Board’s tougher 2001 review rules, which require the combining Class I railroads to enhance competition and be in the public interest.

The railroads expect to file their merger application by the end of January, although Vena says he would like to see it filed by early November.

Subscribe to FreightWaves’ Rail e-newsletter and get the latest insights on rail freight right in your inbox.

Related coverage:

BNSF and CSX announce new joint domestic and international intermodal service

Lutnick backs Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern rail merger 

US rail freight snaps win streak

Broyles named CEO of R.J. Corman Railroad Group