Watch Now


C.H. Robinson’s model increasingly validated with another solid quarter

Analysts embrace what CEO Bozeman is doing; 3PL’s key operating metrics improve year on year

C.H. Robinson's third quarter earnings were solidly positive. (Photo: Shutterstock)

(A summary of key financial numbers at C.H. Robinson in the third quarter can be found here.)

Third-quarter earnings at 3PL giant C.H. Robinson, in tandem with the analyst call that followed the release Wednesday, provided fresh signs that the “model” CEO Dave Bozeman talks about relentlessly is having a growing impact on fiscal performance and equity analyst acceptance.


When Bozeman took over as CEO in June 2023, his first earnings call was at the start of August. There was an undercurrent of skepticism from analysts about whether the former Ford executive could transform the brokerage company that had been struggling by virtually every metric and had fired its previous CEO at the start of the year.

One questioner on that August call referred to Bozeman’s “background in some of the other maybe more disruptive parts of the brokerage industry that have shown an ability to take quite a bit of share in very short periods of time.” That appeared to be a reference to Bozeman’s time with Amazon, where he was involved in freight operations.

And then the question that hung over that meeting: “What’s different about them versus what Robinson’s been doing recently?”

There was nothing like that on Wednesday’s earnings call. Virtually every analyst question was prefaced with congratulations for the third-quarter performance. 


When questions arose about “the model,” Bozeman’s shorthand for the Lean system-based changes at C.H. Robinson (NASDAQ: CHRW), there was no sense of irony or skepticism. As Ken Hoexter of Bank of America Merrill Lynch asked Bozeman in reference to a market “inflection” when the freight recession turns bullish, “When it approaches, how do you think that impacts the business in the new operating model?”

Numbers supporting the model

If the model is being accepted by the analyst community, it’s because once again C.H. Robinson posted earnings that backed up the boasting.

The most significant number in the earnings to reflect how far C.H. Robinson has come may have been the adjusted gross profit margin for the company’s transportation operations. The North American Surface Transportation (NAST) segment is the bulk of that, but activities such as the Global Forwarding business are in there too.

Adjusted gross profit margin, a non-GAAP measurement, was 16.4% in transportation in the third quarter. It had not been that high since a 16.9% figure was posted in the third quarter of 2019. During that same year, the first two quarters came in at 18.6% and 18.3%.

But 2019 was a weak year in trucking. Brokerages benefited from that because contractual business they had secured in 2018, a strong market, could be supplied with spot capacity from the 2019 sliding truckload market.

The 16.4% figure for the third quarter of 2024 had no such benefit. Spot rates were mostly higher for the quarter, so to claw back to a 16.4% margin from 15.4% in the first quarter and 15.8% in the second took more than just the market breaking the right way for C.H. Robinson.

The bottom-line number for C.H. Robinson is that its non-GAAP earnings per share of $1.28 beat consensus forecasts by 13 cents, according to SeekingAlpha. Revenue of $4.64 billion beat consensus by $100 million.

Year-on-year gains starting to emerge

Improvements in the stock price at C.H. Robinson since the company’s surprising first-quarter report, which set off a sharp run-up, have come mostly on the strength of sequential improvements. For the first two quarters, the year-on-year comparisons were poor.


But the third-quarter figures began to show some notably better numbers compared to a year earlier, even as some of the sequential numbers were only modestly improved from the first two earnings reports of 2024.

For example, the adjusted operating margin for the company as a whole was 24.5% in the third quarter. That was better than a year earlier by 660 basis points but had actually slid from the 25.9% posted in the second quarter.

And while total revenue was down, “the model” was seen as driving improvements in gross profits across the company’s sectors. Truckload gross profit was up 12.2% from a year earlier; LTL was up 3.7%; ocean was up 36.25% – admittedly helped by “pull forward” business in anticipation of a port strike; and gains also came in the air and customs business.

Compared with the second quarter, truckload had only a small improvement sequentially, LTL had a slight decline, and ocean, air and customs posted solid gains in profitability.

Bozeman, in his opening remarks on the call, said the results “reflect continued improvement in our execution as we continue to deploy our new operating model. We are raising the bar even in an historically prolonged freight recession, with strong execution and disciplined volume growth across divisions while delivering exceptional service for our customers and carriers.”

The recent history of C.H. Robinson stock is that when the shockingly good first-quarter earnings were released at the end of April, shares added about $9 to a price near $72 pre-earnings. A subsequent earnings shock for the second quarter added about $11 to a stock that at the time had been near $89. The recent 52-week high was $113.10; C.H. Robinson closed Wednesday at $109.64 and was up about 30 cents in post-close trading, after the earnings came out. 

Among other freight-related discussions from the earnings call:

  • Michael Castagnetto, the president of NAST, was asked about reports of a shift in the market away from brokers and toward asset-based carriers. “Traditionally, you see movement in the low end of the cycle toward the asset-based, but we feel really good about how we’re competing in the marketplace,” Castagnetto said. C.H. Robinson “feels really good” about gains in what Castagnetto called “wallet share gains in the contractual space,” a concept discussed during the call that boils down to not chasing volume for the sake of volume. “I think we’ve been pretty honest about how we’re attacking the transactional space and being disciplined,” he said. Castagnetto said during the call that “routing guides are performing incredibly well,” which would mean contract freight is likely to stick with the carrier that signed it up in the first place. “There’s not a lot of freight that’s flowing out of that into the transactional spot market, and in that spot market, it’s incredibly competitive.” C.H. Robinson is focused on “winning the right freight for us,” Castagnetto said.
  • Arun Rajan, chief strategy officer, reprised his comments from previous conference calls about C.H. Robinson’s increasing use of technology and generative AI. He ascribed the improved average gross profit performance in part to “the rigor and discipline in our pricing and procurement efforts,” which now feature annual generation of more than 2 million “algorithm-driven spot rates across truckload and LTL. We’re performing more frequent price discovery and enhancing the quality of the pricing that we deliver.” Generative AI at C.H. Robinson is being used, according to Rajan, to “automate customer coding, order entry, low tenders, appointment scheduling or other manual tasks.”

More articles by John Kingston

Werner CEO stands out for optimistic trucking market outlook

Trucking and marijuana testing find their way to the Supreme Court

Report: Driver shortage claim ‘spurious,’ fixation on efficiency causes turnover

4 Comments

  1. d nusle

    this irks me broker says profits up when trucking rates down hmm makes me wonder why have brokers they res has to be another way enough is enough cheapest brokers and showing profits in our faces

  2. Question

    Why is the stock down so much if the results were so good? Not trying to be snarky, I’m legitimately confused. Can Freightwaves offer an opinion on why that would be?

  3. Daniel

    Yeah with the majority of load board offering 1.00 a mile loads and less to trucking companies. I’m sure they are making a nice profit. Times are bad now for carriers when the economy turns around I wonder how those predatory rates will affect their profits. I know they are one of my last options looking for a load.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

John Kingston

John has an almost 40-year career covering commodities, most of the time at S&P Global Platts. He created the Dated Brent benchmark, now the world’s most important crude oil marker. He was Director of Oil, Director of News, the editor in chief of Platts Oilgram News and the “talking head” for Platts on numerous media outlets, including CNBC, Fox Business and Canada’s BNN. He covered metals before joining Platts and then spent a year running Platts’ metals business as well. He was awarded the International Association of Energy Economics Award for Excellence in Written Journalism in 2015. In 2010, he won two Corporate Achievement Awards from McGraw-Hill, an extremely rare accomplishment, one for steering coverage of the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster and the other for the launch of a public affairs television show, Platts Energy Week.