• DATVF.DALLAX
    0.958
    0.075
    8.5%
  • DATVF.VEU
    1.580
    -0.019
    -1.2%
  • DATVF.CHIATL
    1.964
    -0.085
    -4.1%
  • DATVF.VSU
    1.289
    0.018
    1.4%
  • DATVF.PHLCHI
    0.952
    -0.005
    -0.5%
  • DATVF.LAXDAL
    1.621
    -0.038
    -2.3%
  • DATVF.VNU
    1.488
    -0.028
    -1.8%
  • DATVF.ATLPHL
    1.825
    0.034
    1.9%
  • DATVF.SEALAX
    1.095
    -0.106
    -8.8%
  • DATVF.LAXSEA
    2.098
    -0.056
    -2.6%
  • DATVF.VWU
    1.596
    -0.081
    -4.8%
  • ITVI.USA
    10,446.250
    0.570
    0%
  • OTRI.USA
    8.000
    0.100
    1.3%
  • OTVI.USA
    10,464.970
    -3.010
    0%
  • TLT.USA
    2.610
    0.000
    0%
  • WAIT.USA
    158.000
    8.000
    5.3%
  • DATVF.DALLAX
    0.958
    0.075
    8.5%
  • DATVF.VEU
    1.580
    -0.019
    -1.2%
  • DATVF.CHIATL
    1.964
    -0.085
    -4.1%
  • DATVF.VSU
    1.289
    0.018
    1.4%
  • DATVF.PHLCHI
    0.952
    -0.005
    -0.5%
  • DATVF.LAXDAL
    1.621
    -0.038
    -2.3%
  • DATVF.VNU
    1.488
    -0.028
    -1.8%
  • DATVF.ATLPHL
    1.825
    0.034
    1.9%
  • DATVF.SEALAX
    1.095
    -0.106
    -8.8%
  • DATVF.LAXSEA
    2.098
    -0.056
    -2.6%
  • DATVF.VWU
    1.596
    -0.081
    -4.8%
  • ITVI.USA
    10,446.250
    0.570
    0%
  • OTRI.USA
    8.000
    0.100
    1.3%
  • OTVI.USA
    10,464.970
    -3.010
    0%
  • TLT.USA
    2.610
    0.000
    0%
  • WAIT.USA
    158.000
    8.000
    5.3%
EconomicsNews

Transport costs pose threat to hardline retail margins: Morgan Stanley

Morgan Stanley thinks that Best Buy’s low gross margins and bulky merchandise make the company especially vulnerable to rising transport costs. ( Photo: Wikimedia Commons )

Best Buy, Home Decor, Home Depot, and Lowes heavily exposed to rising transport costs

Autozone, O’Reilly Automotive, Costco, and Walmart have little exposure

In a February 2018 research report titled “Freight-ening Headwinds,” a team of seven Morgan Stanley equity analysts led by Simeon Gutman found that rapidly rising freight costs will pressure retailer/manufacturer margins in 2018. Morgan Stanley expects hardline retail and food producers to be most at risk, where they see 25/45 bps of margin risk in the base case and 45/70 bps in the bear case.

Assuming a 70:30 contract:spot mix in trucking, Morgan Stanley’s Freight Transportation team believes that freight cost inflation will reach anywhere from 15-25% year over year in 2018. Transportation industry observers are well aware of the two factors Morgan Stanley identified as driving this cost inflation: the ELD mandate and the general shortage of professional truck drivers. FreightWaves reported on the retail apocalypse and its impact on freight movements earlier this year.

Morgan Stanley’s analysts devised a framework to determine which companies are most and least exposed to rising transport costs. Determining factors included 1. the mix of in-house vs. outsourced transportation operations, 2. size/leverage with freight vendors, including proportion of multi-year contracts, and 3. the weight and size of the transported merchandise itself. Morgan Stanley believes that the companies most exposed to rising transportation costs are those that outsource all of their logistics, have less than $3B in cost of goods sold (COGS), and earn a gross margin below 40%. The investment bank believes that large retailers with scale, leverage over suppliers, and some insourced logistics should pull away from their smaller competitors. In general, hardline retailers selling incompressible, bulky items face more downside risk than specialty apparel retailers, for instance. 

The analysts lowered their 2018 earnings-per-share (EPS) estimates for 7 hardline retailers by an average of ~4.5%: GNC, Vitamin Shoppe, Inc., Michaels, Williams-Sonoma, At Home, Lumber Liquidators, and Ulta Beauty. Home improvement, electronics, and furnishings are the retail categories most at risk, according to Morgan Stanley. 

Morgan Stanley’s bull, base, and bear case outcomes (from a shipper perspective) are a 5%, 15%, and 25% increase in transportation costs (calculated at a 70:30 contract:spot mix). If the base case holds and transport costs increase by 15% in 2018, Morgan Stanley calls for a -17.6% headwind against Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.’s EPS and a -9.9% headwind against Lumber Liquidator’s EPS. Both of those companies outsource 100% of their transportation to third party providers.

There are other dimensions that affect a shipper’s exposure to transport costs. The value of a company’s merchandise—specifically the gross margins it generates—when combined with the ease of moving it, also give insight into how vulnerable companies are to rising freight prices. Companies with lower gross margins and heavier, bulkier merchandise will experience out-sized impacts from high trucking costs: Best Buy (BBY) rates the lowest on these two metrics, with gross margins under 25% and a Morgan Stanley-assigned ease of shipping score of 2/10. Home Decor, Home Depot, and Lowes occupy the same region on the graph. 

Of Best Buy, Home Decor, Home Depot, and Lowes, Lowes and Home Depot have failed to recover any of the ground lost during last month’s correction. Lowes (LOW) stock is still down 18.7% from its high at $107.40 on January 26. Home Depot has fallen 12.1% from its Jan. 26 high at $207.23 to $182.16 on Friday, March 9; Best Buy dropped to as low as $68.02 from its January 26 high at $77.84, but has since recovered to $73.81. Best Buy, Lowes, Home Depot, and Home Decor all outsource 100% of their transportation needs. 

Hardline retailers with less exposure to the spot market include companies like Autozone (10% outsourced), Costco (10% outsourced), O’Reilly Automotive (20% outsourced), and Walmart (30% outsourced). 

Stay up-to-date with the latest commentary and insights on FreightTech and the impact to the markets by subscribing.

 

Tags
Show More

John Paul Hampstead, Director, Passport Research

John Paul conducts research on multimodal freight markets and holds a Ph.D. in English literature from the University of Michigan. Prior to building a research team at FreightWaves, JP spent two years on the editorial side covering trucking markets, freight brokerage, and M&A.

One Comment

  1. ELD mandate has forced the existing driver supply to work more hours nonstop creating more fatigue and additional loss of productivity from an already understaffed industry. Plus the ELD mandate has hurt recruiting efforts for future drivers. The mandate has to go.

  2. Fmcsa and ATA how are those elds working for ya now even if you’re not in trucking your voice needs to be heard because things are about to get real when you go to buy things say goodbye to your tax break that you might have got because you’ll be spending it on inflation due to the ATA

  3. It’s a total amazing how you can get loaded in 15 minutes and when you get to a grocery warehouse or Walmart takes 4 to 6 hours to get offloaded. Plus there is a delivery fee from $50 to 400 or even more. That cost the drivers that turnaround in charge of shipper. Then the shipper chargers the customer the amount. But it’s takes the driver 30 to 90 days to get their money back. Now with ELD these companies are starting to realize they cannot go on their merry way screw the drivers over when they pick up and deliver times especially when they make up appointment time and agree upon it but it’s takes from 4 to 6 hours or more to offloaded you. And there’s no shortage of drivers the shortages caused by shippers and receivers cannot manage their time by screwing the drivers when they pick up and deliver.

Close