Yellow’s Tuesday filing in a Delaware bankruptcy court said claims stemming from its failure to provide 60-day notices to employees ahead of mass layoffs should be thrown out, or at least materially reduced.
Counsel for the company said WARN Act requirements don’t apply as the defunct less-than-truckload carrier’s shutdown was abrupt and the result of the Teamsters union’s refusal to allow a second round of operational changes that were integral to its survival.
The turnaround plan dubbed One Yellow included consolidating its four LTL operating companies, closing redundant terminals and making some drivers work freight on the docks, among other changes. Yellow began pursuing the changes in 2022 and announced in June of last year that it would be out of cash in weeks if the Teamsters didn’t acquiesce. The union contended it had given enough in the past in the form of wage and benefits concessions and that it wasn’t going to keep bailing the company out.
Yellow (OTC: YELLQ) believes the WARN Act doesn’t apply as its closing was unforeseen. It said even in its final days it planned to keep running the business and had a private equity investor lined up to provide it needed capital. It said the union’s denial of the second round of operational changes, and the issuance of a strike notice over missed benefits payments, led to a rapid deterioration in its business.
The strike notice “scared off Yellow’s customers, leading to the sudden, unexpected collapse of Yellow in a matter of days,” the filing stated.
The carrier’s daily shipments declined from 44,550 on July 12 last year to 32,500 on July 19, two days after the strike notice. Shipments fell to 10,450 on July 21 and were nearly zero by July 26. Yellow ceased operations on July 30.
The company said it didn’t have time to plan for mass layoffs and the issuance of WARN Act notices was “neither feasible nor required.” It claims protection from the notification requirement due to the sudden decline in business and argued the requirement’s “faltering company exception” applies as it was still seeking business from customers and capital from investors in its last days. The notices would have scared off both, the filing said.
Of the roughly 1,300 claims referenced in filings, some were made on behalf of employees by pension or health and welfare funds, which “lack standing” to bring the claims, Yellow asserted. Also, some employees released the company from the claims in exchange for severance. A separate filing showed approximately $244 million in claims related to WARN Act violations but noted that many were duplicate claims filed by both employees and their unions or union-related funds.
“The reality is that the Debtors shut down their businesses on an extremely short time frame as the result of completely irrational behavior from the [Teamsters] that neither the Debtors nor any other rational employer would have expected or planned for. No WARN act [provision] provides for liability under these circumstances,” the filing said.
Yellow said it was ready for a hard fight with the union and that “give-and-take” often led to operational changes in the past.
“Based on this historical record, Yellow understood that the [union] would drive a hard bargain but never drive the Company to the brink of failure, which would risk losing 22,000 unionized jobs,” the filing read.
Yellow’s objection asked the court to grant the order with an April 4 deadline for claimants to respond and a hearing date of April 11.
Discovery will continue in Yellow’s $137M suit against Teamsters
A U.S. District Court in Kansas said discovery in Yellow’s $137 million breach-of-contract lawsuit against the Teamsters will continue. The union argued to stay the costly advanced stages of discovery for a case that may ultimately be thrown out. A separate motion from the Teamsters has called on the court to dismiss the case.
An order denying the stay showed that the union had produced less than 1% of its total expected document production. Unsurprisingly, the filing showed Yellow had “substantially completed their document production by the March 1 deadline.”
The suit claims the Teamsters intentionally blocked the proposed change of operations, which it didn’t have the authority to do.
Brokerage Compliance Symposium
The day before F3. Every compliance issue you face - fraud exposure, carrier liability, FMCSA rules, cargo theft, insurance gaps - navigated by attorneys and operators defining best practices in a changing industry.
F3 Awards Dinner
The night before F3. FreightTech100 companies honored. FreightTech 25 and Shipper of Choice winners revealed live. Cocktail reception into dinner and live music - 300 industry leaders in one purpose-built room.
F3: Future of Freight Festival
Industry-defining keynotes, rapid-fire technology demos, and industry leaders networking in experiences across Chattanooga - plus the inaugural F3 Awards Dinner featuring the FreightTech and Shipper of Choice reveals.
The day before F3. Every compliance issue you face - fraud exposure, carrier liability, FMCSA rules, cargo theft, insurance gaps - navigated by attorneys and operators defining best practices in a changing industry.
The Signal at Chattanooga Choo Choo • Chattanooga, TN Register NowThe night before F3. FreightTech100 companies honored. FreightTech 25 and Shipper of Choice winners revealed live. Cocktail reception into dinner and live music - 300 industry leaders in one purpose-built room.
The Signal at Chattanooga Choo Choo • Chattanooga, TN Register NowIndustry-defining keynotes, rapid-fire technology demos, and industry leaders networking in experiences across Chattanooga - plus the inaugural F3 Awards Dinner featuring the FreightTech and Shipper of Choice reveals.
The Signal at Chattanooga Choo Choo • Chattanooga, TN Register Now
Paul
Worked for Best way / Reddaway for 35 years. As soon as Yellow bought the company, just as they did Roafway, the deterioration began.
Nevertheless, most of employees have moved on, but it doesn’t mean compensation should not be given.
Sandra Walker
Management was receiving bonuses and increases. I hope they got what they wanted because all I got was unemployed 4 yrs away from retirement.
Ronny McEuen
It was 100 percent managements fault. They mismanaged the company for years. We gave concessions for years , but management kept getting raises and bonuses. Plus on the strike vote it was due to Yellow failed to pay Central States for our health and welfare . So we didn’t have our insurance coverage. The union stepped in and got Central States to reinstate our insurance coverage and the company decided to reject the offer that they had offered to the union. Plus the first part of June the company and stock holders voted for over 4.6 million for Executives pay to stick around to be there to close everything down. So they had time to comply with the Warn act. Just more of their greed to get over the works that kept the company afloat for so many years. I have copies of communications between the company and union. It shows what the company offered to the union and what the offer was. The company offered 11 dollars an hour increase over the length of a new contract . It’s for 2 dollars an hour for each year of the contract. Then they backed out of it at the end of July and decided to file for bankruptcy. Plus Jack Cooper put a bids in for the Company to keep the employees jobs but again Yellow declined the offers.
Rodney Willis
With all that was going on why were the CEO’S GIVING themselves outrageous healthy bonuses to each other on the way out the door and in the middle of holding back payments on our medical benefits they were not trying to salvage or save us this is the behavior that got us to this point!!
Craig
Yellow management are the full blame of the company failure. West Coast gave up over 100,000 per employee to help the company and we got nothing out of it. But management got everything. After loans all paid for yellow needs to pay each employee from 2010 to 2023 their pay and union benefits. The union need to go to the courts and fight it for us even if they have to sue the management for this.
Sean abernethy
I worked for Holland a yellow company for 26 years..Yellow is to blame for years of mismanagement the union employees gave up over 100k per employees over the last decade..we were the lowest paid in LTL Yellow never invested until the final year in new equipment.. we drove junk I’m disappointed that I lost my job but I have moved on fortunately to a better job
Ronald Broyles
I bet they wish they had made concessions now.
No use in crying about it. Go find you a job making what the rest of us make. I have no empathy for any of them. Our way or the highway. How’s the highway treating ya?
Peter C.Ely
Yellow freight was another Carrier of LTL greed.
Sorry the employees lost their jobs.
Look at BNSF and Union Pacific railroads.
Same thing is happening!
Executives, milking it dry!!