The waiver would have allowed California to enact a state law — passed in 2002 but not yet implemented — that seeks to dramatically slash greenhouse gas emissions such as carbon dioxide from cars and trucks. Nineteen other states are awaiting California's enactment of the law to allow each to pass implement their own versions.
On Dec. 19, the Bush administration denied the two-year-old California waiver request, saying that a new federal energy bill — signed the same day — pre-empts the California law by setting tougher national standards than sought in the state law. The EPA denial argued that because greenhouse gas emissions “harm the environment in California and elsewhere regardless of where the emissions occur,” California does not face an “exclusive or unique” challenge requiring special emission regulations.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, in announcing the EPA suit, said the state and other parties are seeking to reverse the denial and called the EPA decision 'wrong.'
“It is unconscionable that the federal government is keeping California and 19 other states from adopting these standards,” Schwarzenegger said in a statement. “They are ignoring the will of millions of people who want their government to take action in the fight against global warming.”
The 19 states include Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and Florida,.
State officials maintain that California need only show that its faces a serious global-warming danger — and not necessarily a unique danger — in order to receive the EPA waiver.
The state chose to file the case in the San Francisco’s Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and take advantage of an oversight in the EPA denial ruling allowing the case to be filed outside of Washington, as is typical in such cases. The Ninth Circuit Court is known for being more liberal in its rulings than the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Under the federal Clean Air Act, California can set stricter-than-federal emission standards as long as the state obtains a federal waiver from the EPA. Last month's denial was the first after more than 40 EPA-approved California waivers over the past 40 years.
In 2002, California approved the emission law with a goal of eliminating 30 percent of the greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles and trucks in the state by 2016. The state tried to enact the standards set forth in the law, but a court ruled that while California does have the right to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, the state required an EPA waiver before doing so. The state first asked for the waiver from the EPA regarding the law in 2005.
The federal energy bill, passed by Congress earlier this year and enacted by the White House on Dec. 19, seeks to cut greenhouse gas emissions by raising national fuel economy standards to 35 miles per gallon by 2020.
The 2002 California law would achieve its 30 percent greenhouse gas reduction by increasing California automobile fuel economy from the current 27.5 mpg to just under 34 mpg by 2016.
Two weeks ago, California Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. questioned not only the EPA decision but also its basis in law.
'It is completely absurd to assert that California does not have a compelling need to fight global warming by curbing greenhouse gas emissions from cars,' Brown said. 'There is absolutely no legal justification for the Bush administration to deny this request.'
Brown also noted that this decision not only affects California but numerous other states as well. Nineteen other states — Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont and Washington — have adopted, or are in the process of adopting California's emissions standards. EPA approval of California's waiver would have applied to these other states standards without separate waiver requests to the EPA.
All but Colorado, Iowa, Montana and Utah joined in Wednesday's suit with California.
Also joining the suit were five environmental groups: the Conservation Law Foundation, the Environmental Defense Fund, the International Center for Technology Assessment, the National Resources Defense Council, and the Sierra Club. ' Keith Higginbotham
Brokerage Compliance Symposium
The day before F3. Every compliance issue you face - fraud exposure, carrier liability, FMCSA rules, cargo theft, insurance gaps - navigated by attorneys and operators defining best practices in a changing industry.
F3 Awards Dinner
The night before F3. FreightTech100 companies honored. FreightTech 25 and Shipper of Choice winners revealed live. Cocktail reception into dinner and live music - 300 industry leaders in one purpose-built room.
F3: Future of Freight Festival
Industry-defining keynotes, rapid-fire technology demos, and industry leaders networking in experiences across Chattanooga - plus the inaugural F3 Awards Dinner featuring the FreightTech and Shipper of Choice reveals.
The day before F3. Every compliance issue you face - fraud exposure, carrier liability, FMCSA rules, cargo theft, insurance gaps - navigated by attorneys and operators defining best practices in a changing industry.
The Signal at Chattanooga Choo Choo • Chattanooga, TN Register NowThe night before F3. FreightTech100 companies honored. FreightTech 25 and Shipper of Choice winners revealed live. Cocktail reception into dinner and live music - 300 industry leaders in one purpose-built room.
The Signal at Chattanooga Choo Choo • Chattanooga, TN Register NowIndustry-defining keynotes, rapid-fire technology demos, and industry leaders networking in experiences across Chattanooga - plus the inaugural F3 Awards Dinner featuring the FreightTech and Shipper of Choice reveals.
The Signal at Chattanooga Choo Choo • Chattanooga, TN Register Now