'We think that it's a facility that's well suited for breakbulk, bulk, project cargo or roll-on/roll-off,' spokesman Joe Harris said.
The announcement is a departure from the VPA's traditional business model of operating the port itself instead of acting as a landlord to private terminal operators, as do the majority of U.S. port authorities. It also runs counter to the VPA's strategy of controlling all the maritime and intermodal facilities within its jurisdiction.
![]() |
The VPA's philosophy for more than 30 years has been to control all the terminals in the area so it can rationalize ocean services and move ships to terminals that are best suited to quickly load and unload them, based on labor, space, equipment or other variables.
The VPA previously signaled that it had alternative plans for the Portsmouth facility, most recently in a press release last month declaring it no longer was considering three unsolicited bids to privatize the state-owned marine terminals.
![]() |
| Connaughton |
Harris said the VPA would not lease the Portsmouth terminal to a container handling company that will compete with its core business at the APM Terminal and Norfolk Marine Terminal on the other side of the Elizabeth River.
The VPA's 1 million-square-foot Newport News terminal handles and stores steel, automobiles and oversize cargo shipments. The agency envisions PMT processing wood chips or other commodities that aren't already transported through the port, Harris said.
'We leased APM, but we still have to pay the operating costs at PMT. By leasing it out we've shed those costs and the plan is to turn it into positive cash flow,' he explained, adding the VPA wants to wrap up its PMT operation by April 1.
The deadline for interested parties to submit a letter of interest regarding the Portsmouth facility is Oct. 28. ' Eric Kulisch

