'States have broad power to regulate liquor,' said Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the high court's majority. 'This power, however, does not allow states to ban, or severely limit, the direct shipment of out-of-state wine while simultaneously authorizing shipment by in-state producers.'
Kennedy added, 'if a state chooses to allow direct shipments of wine, it must do so on even-handed terms.' His opinion was joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Brayer, David H. Souter, and Antonin Scalia.
Although the U.S. wine industry does an estimated $21.6 billion in annual sales, smaller wineries say they can't compete with larger vineyards unless they can sell directly to customers over the Internet or allow visitors to their premises to ship bottles home.
Since Prohibition ended in 1933, almost half the U.S. states have passed laws requiring outside wineries to sell their products through licensed wholesalers within a state, allowing that state to collect taxes on alcohol.
However, the Constitution also prohibits states from discriminating against out-of-state businesses.
In a dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas said the 21st Amendment to the Constitution, which ended Prohibition, gave states the clear authority to regulate alcohol as they see fit. The high court's majority ruling 'does this nation no service by ignoring the textual commands of the Constitution and acts of Congress' by needlessly overturning long-prevailing regulations, Thomas asserted. Also dissenting were Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O'Connor and John Paul Stevens.
The ruling is likely to be extended, as a matter of practicality, to beer and other alcoholic beverages.
The 24 states that had banned direct shipments from out-of-state wineries are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah and Vermont.
The cases on which the Supreme Court ruled are Granholm v. Heald [docket no. 03-1116], Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Association v. Heald [03-1120], and Swedenburg v. Kelly [03-1274].
For more information, see July 2004 American Shipper, pages 36-39.
Brokerage Compliance Symposium
The day before F3. Every compliance issue you face - fraud exposure, carrier liability, FMCSA rules, cargo theft, insurance gaps - navigated by attorneys and operators defining best practices in a changing industry.
F3 Awards Dinner
The night before F3. FreightTech100 companies honored. FreightTech 25 and Shipper of Choice winners revealed live. Cocktail reception into dinner and live music - 300 industry leaders in one purpose-built room.
F3: Future of Freight Festival
Industry-defining keynotes, rapid-fire technology demos, and industry leaders networking in experiences across Chattanooga - plus the inaugural F3 Awards Dinner featuring the FreightTech and Shipper of Choice reveals.
The day before F3. Every compliance issue you face - fraud exposure, carrier liability, FMCSA rules, cargo theft, insurance gaps - navigated by attorneys and operators defining best practices in a changing industry.
The Signal at Chattanooga Choo Choo • Chattanooga, TN Register NowThe night before F3. FreightTech100 companies honored. FreightTech 25 and Shipper of Choice winners revealed live. Cocktail reception into dinner and live music - 300 industry leaders in one purpose-built room.
The Signal at Chattanooga Choo Choo • Chattanooga, TN Register NowIndustry-defining keynotes, rapid-fire technology demos, and industry leaders networking in experiences across Chattanooga - plus the inaugural F3 Awards Dinner featuring the FreightTech and Shipper of Choice reveals.
The Signal at Chattanooga Choo Choo • Chattanooga, TN Register Now