• ITVI.USA
    11,074.870
    63.600
    0.6%
  • OTRI.USA
    5.340
    0.050
    0.9%
  • OTVI.USA
    11,048.870
    52.590
    0.5%
  • TLT.USA
    2.580
    0.010
    0.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.ATLPHL
    2.020
    0.120
    6.3%
  • TSTOPVRPM.CHIATL
    1.590
    0.110
    7.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.DALLAX
    1.380
    -0.030
    -2.1%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXDAL
    1.930
    0.070
    3.8%
  • TSTOPVRPM.PHLCHI
    1.140
    0.040
    3.6%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXSEA
    2.390
    0.030
    1.3%
  • WAIT.USA
    120.000
    -19.000
    -13.7%
  • ITVI.USA
    11,074.870
    63.600
    0.6%
  • OTRI.USA
    5.340
    0.050
    0.9%
  • OTVI.USA
    11,048.870
    52.590
    0.5%
  • TLT.USA
    2.580
    0.010
    0.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.ATLPHL
    2.020
    0.120
    6.3%
  • TSTOPVRPM.CHIATL
    1.590
    0.110
    7.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.DALLAX
    1.380
    -0.030
    -2.1%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXDAL
    1.930
    0.070
    3.8%
  • TSTOPVRPM.PHLCHI
    1.140
    0.040
    3.6%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXSEA
    2.390
    0.030
    1.3%
  • WAIT.USA
    120.000
    -19.000
    -13.7%
American ShipperContainerMaritimeNewsShippingTrade and Compliance

WTO: Coronavirus crisis could rival Great Depression

“These numbers are ugly. There’s no way around that,” admitted World Trade Organization (WTO) Director-General Roberto Azevedo during a press conference on Wednesday, upon the release of the WTO’s coronavirus forecast.

The trade organization outlined two potential scenarios: an optimistic V-shaped recovery in which world merchandise trade volume falls 12.9% this year and a pessimistic L-shaped pattern in which volume collapses by 31.9%.

“The optimistic scenario is about the same order [of volume decline] as the 2009 financial crisis, and the pessimistic one is about the same size as the Great Depression in the 1930s — but over one year, not three,” Azevedo said.

“This may well be the deepest economic downturn of our lifetimes,” he warned, conceding that that outcome could be even worse than the WTO’s pessimistic scenario. “If this [pandemic] is not brought under control and governments fail to implement and coordinate an effective response, the decline could be even higher.”

Chart credit: WTO Secretariat

The good news, said the director-general, is that the world should bounce back from the coronavirus much more swiftly than from previous crises. After the 2009 financial crisis, merchandise trade never reattained its previous growth trajectory.

“The underlying causes are very different. The economic engine was in decent shape before the pandemic — the pandemic cut the fuel line. The Great Depression and the financial crisis were due to the fundamentals of the economy. This is a health crisis.

“Regardless of how steep the initial fall is, we could be back to full speed at pre-pandemic levels in one year or maybe two,” he maintained. “Theoretically, it should be easier to reconnect the fuel line to the engine.”

Keys to recovery

He believes the nature of the rebound will hinge on how quickly the virus is brought under control and on how governments respond via policy. “Businesses and households must believe that this is a temporary one-off economic shock, which will require fiscal, monetary and trade policy to all pull in one direction,” he said.

The danger is that trade policy will take a separate course, toward protectionism, where it was already headed prior to the outbreak. “Persistent trade tensions” led to a decline in merchandise trade during the second half of last year, said the WTO.

Chart credit: WTO Secretariat

Azevedo acknowledged that the outbreak has severely affected global supply chains. In response, he said, “either supply chains will have to be diversified away from just one country or one region, or countries will bring production home and concentrate it within the borders of each country.”

The latter “would be the wrong response,” he insisted. “Closing borders and impeding trade will make it more difficult for investors and households to believe we’re back on track.” If they don’t, they’ll spend more cautiously, stunting future growth.

Merchandise trade reverts to precrisis levels next year under the WTO’s optimistic scenario. In the L-shaped scenario, it doesn’t recover and “it will remain well below the pre-COVID-19 trend line,” Azevedo said.

How trade relates to GDP

The WTO’s optimistic case assumes social distancing lasts only three months, with improved weather conditions easing the spread of the virus. The pessimistic case assumes mitigation measures persist throughout 2020 and until a vaccine is developed.

The V-shaped scenario assumes global GDP will fall 4.8% this year, the L-shaped scenario 11.1%.

An important indicator for container shipping is the ratio of world merchandise trade growth to global GDP — so-called “trade-to-GDP elasticity.”

A ratio over 1.0 means that merchandise trade — and thus container volumes — are changing at a faster rate than GDP. In good times, when GDP is rising, a ratio over 1.0 means that supply chains are globalizing and goods are being shipped by sea to a greater degree than economies are expanding.

But trade-to-GDP elasticity goes both ways. In a downturn, a ratio over 1.0 means trade is falling faster than the world economy. Furthermore, crises cause the ratio to surge as decreased demand reduces imports of durable goods and trade costs and transit times escalate.

The WTO calculated that in the 2009 financial crisis, merchandise trade fell 6.3 times faster than GDP. It forecasts that the ratio would be 3.6 in its optimistic coronavirus case and 5.3 in its pessimistic case.

Chart credit: WTO Secretariat

During the 2009 financial crisis, the WTO explained, “reduction in demand was more concentrated in highly tradable durable manufactured goods,” i.e., the kind of items that fill containers.

There is also significant fallout for durable goods in the coronavirus crisis, especially for “sectors characterized by complex value-chain linkages, particularly electronics and automotive products,” said the WTO. However, the current crisis features a higher proportion of fallout for “non-tradable sectors … such recreation and accommodation,” thus a lower ratio of merchandise trade-to-GDP than in 2009.

The reason the ratio is higher in the pessimistic coronavirus case than in the optimistic scenario is “the longer duration would lead to a larger drop in spending on durables, which are highly tradeable,” said the WTO.

The WTO forecast assumes ratios will remain elevated in 2021. In its optimistic case, it projects merchandise trade will grow at 2.9 times the pace of GDP, by a rate of 21.3%. In its pessimistic case, it projects merchandise trade will grow at quadruple the pace of GDP, by a rate of 24%. In other words, ocean shipping volume might go up as quickly as it descended. Click for more FreightWaves/American Shipper articles by Greg Miller

Chart credit: WTO Secretariat/UNCTAD

Tags
Show More

Greg Miller, Senior Editor

Greg Miller covers maritime for FreightWaves and American Shipper. After graduating Cornell University, he fled upstate New York's harsh winters for the island of St. Thomas, where he rose to editor-in-chief of the Virgin Islands Business Journal. In the aftermath of Hurricane Marilyn, he moved to New York City, where he served as senior editor of Cruise Industry News. He then spent 15 years at the shipping magazine Fairplay in various senior roles, including managing editor. He is currently sheltering in place in Manhattan with his wife and two Shih Tzus.

6 Comments

  1. Quote:

    “The WTO’s optimistic case assumes social distancing lasts only three months, with improved weather conditions easing the spread of the virus. The pessimistic case assumes mitigation measures persist throughout 2020 and until a vaccine is developed.”

    The latter(pessimistic case) is the more logical realistic scenario and the one that should be implemented by way of mitigation measures .

    That being said , I do not share the belief behind the hypothesis of a “V shaped recovery ” nor one of an “L shaped recovery” . I Believe it will be more likely one of a slight combination of the two . Not so prolonged and not so volatile , but a little “bumpy” none the less . Then off to the moon Alice !

    In my humble opinion ………..

  2. Hello Mr Greg Miller,
    Great article in providing the two views of the market.
    I do have a question: Which countries are included in North America and Which countries are included in Central and South America? Where is Mexico included?
    Thanks, Hector

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Close