• ITVI.USA
    15,285.200
    -0.340
    0%
  • OTLT.USA
    2.779
    0.003
    0.1%
  • OTRI.USA
    21.420
    -0.030
    -0.1%
  • OTVI.USA
    15,255.990
    -0.630
    0%
  • TSTOPVRPM.ATLPHL
    3.300
    -0.240
    -6.8%
  • TSTOPVRPM.CHIATL
    2.950
    -0.020
    -0.7%
  • TSTOPVRPM.DALLAX
    1.440
    0.000
    0%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXDAL
    3.310
    0.060
    1.8%
  • TSTOPVRPM.PHLCHI
    2.150
    0.020
    0.9%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXSEA
    3.950
    -0.100
    -2.5%
  • WAIT.USA
    126.000
    1.000
    0.8%
  • ITVI.USA
    15,285.200
    -0.340
    0%
  • OTLT.USA
    2.779
    0.003
    0.1%
  • OTRI.USA
    21.420
    -0.030
    -0.1%
  • OTVI.USA
    15,255.990
    -0.630
    0%
  • TSTOPVRPM.ATLPHL
    3.300
    -0.240
    -6.8%
  • TSTOPVRPM.CHIATL
    2.950
    -0.020
    -0.7%
  • TSTOPVRPM.DALLAX
    1.440
    0.000
    0%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXDAL
    3.310
    0.060
    1.8%
  • TSTOPVRPM.PHLCHI
    2.150
    0.020
    0.9%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXSEA
    3.950
    -0.100
    -2.5%
  • WAIT.USA
    126.000
    1.000
    0.8%
American ShipperShippingTrade and Compliance

Drewry says carriers ‘spooked’ by overcapacity

   In a new analysis, Drewry Supply Chain Advisors has found that “carriers continue to be spooked by the specter of imminent big ship deliveries and so are fighting to hold onto market share.
   “This market behavior will put further pressure on freight rates through 2014.”
   It added that the issue really comes down to a lack of demand and an overabundance of supply.
   Another container shipping analyst, Alphaliner, noted in the November 26 issue of its weekly newsletter that the three largest container carriers — Maersk, MSC and CMA CGM — have on order capacity equal to 15.6 percent of their current combined fleet; the next 18 largest carriers have orders equal to 19.8 percent of their existing fleet.
   “Despite the challenge they face, the second-tier carriers continue to have a strong appetite for new capacity in their bid to lower operating costs to match the scale economies enjoyed by the largest carriers, and they continue to forge new capacity alliances in this respect,” Alphaliner wrote.
   Drewry said, “At a trade-route level, carriers have been relatively successful in matching supply with traffic growth, helped by some improvement in overall demand levels. However, they have generally failed to turn this advantage into stronger pricing.”
   As a result, Drewry said, “there is an increasing disconnect between market fundamentals and freight rates. Despite respectable load factors, carriers are struggling to achieve sustainable rate rises on the spot market and this is strengthening cargo owners’ hand in contract rate negotiations.”
   Drewry’s own Global Freight Index, a weighted average across all main
trades excluding Intra-Asia, recovered in November, following two consecutive months
of decline. It was up 10 percent over October to $1,957 per 40 foot container.
   It attributed that increase to enforcement of general rate increases on several Asia-origin trades, but said “how sustainable
these increases prove to be remains open to question with peak season
now fully concluded.”

Chris Dupin

Chris Dupin has written about trade and transportation and other business subjects for a variety of publications before joining American Shipper and Freightwaves.

We are glad you’re enjoying the content

Sign up for a free FreightWaves account today for unlimited access to all of our latest content

By signing in for the first time, I give consent for FreightWaves to send me event updates and news. I can unsubscribe from these emails at any time. For more information please see our Privacy Policy.