Watch Now

What happens if Congress blocks the railroad strike?

Walkout by rank-and-file workers would be risky, according to rail expert

Sen. Richard Burr pleading his case on the Senate floor on Wednesday. (Photo: U.S. Senate)

Rail workers could gamble on an illegal walkout if Congress succeeds in blocking a national strike early Friday morning through legislative action, according to a rail expert.

In the increasingly unlikely event that either the House or the Senate produces a settlement package that the remaining holdout unions will agree to, a walkout by frustrated rank-and-file workers could still occur.

“If Congress passes legislation it would immediately go to Joe Biden for his signature, and the minute he signs it, the unions would be obligated to end the impasse,” John Brennan III, a former senior counsel for Union Pacific Railroad, told FreightWaves.

“But labor has walked out in the past” despite such agreements, he said. “The thing is, if they try that, the railroads can march into court and get an injunction from a federal judge ordering the union to go back. And if they defy that order, the unions could be hit with hefty fines.”

What would be the incentive then, for labor to defy such an agreement in the first place?

“There’s a lot of pent-up frustration out there, particularly with regard to working conditions, and this would be a way of blowing off steam and flexing their muscles.”

But options for a legislative settlement are dwindling. On Wednesday, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., blocked a resolution introduced on Monday by Sens. Richard Burr, R-N.C., and Roger Wicker, R-Miss., that would have codified the Presidential Emergency Board recommendations issued in August.

“What Congress should be doing is not passing the Burr-Wicker resolution and forcing railroad workers back to work under horrendous working conditions,” Sanders said in response to the Republicans’ attempt to pass the bill through unanimous consent. “What we should be doing is telling the CEOs in the rail industry, ‘Treat your workers with dignity and respect, not contempt.’”

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., could still bring the Republican bill to the floor for a vote — but that is highly unlikely given the political ramifications.

The Democrat-controlled House has yet to offer a legislative settlement, which could build off the Burr-Wicker resolution and include incentives to appease the remaining union holdouts.

Jeff Davis, senior fellow at the Eno Center for Transportation, said Congress could still pass a bill extending the cooling-off period. “Doing so would more likely come from the Democrats, because they don’t want to be seen as anti-union but also don’t want this to have a national supply chain breakdown right before the midterm elections,” Davis told FreightWaves.

“Or they could also reach a deal through the guiding hand of [Labor Secretary] Marty Walsh, and avoid resorting to a legislative settlement altogether. But they could also end up going on strike at 12:01a.m. on Friday, or the railroads could lock them out — whichever side wants to go first.”

Click for more FreightWaves articles by John Gallagher.

F3: Future of Freight Festival


The second annual F3: Future of Freight Festival will be held in Chattanooga, “The Scenic City,” this November. F3 combines innovation and entertainment — featuring live demos, industry experts discussing freight market trends for 2024, afternoon networking events, and Grammy Award-winning musicians performing in the evenings amidst the cool Appalachian fall weather.


  1. Wo Joe

    I wonder if Unions have proposed this specific earned sick time. So many employers will give their employees 3.07hrs of sick time per pay period for them to bank and use when they need it. Its win, win. The company has the employee coming to work and the worker is earning sick time besides his pay each pay period. A lot of public safety and school employees earn their sick time in this manner.

  2. Joe

    Yes the railroad has PTC but it doesn’t pick up thousands of gallons of leaking poison or a deadly gas leaking out. Neither does a zombie one eyed crew that has only slept a few hours the last 3 days. Have you ever had you vision go dark with your eyes open? Is it considered the cost of doing business when thousands of innocent people die? Maybe they need an incident to happen so they will have some data to justify making a rule. This is ignorant to even think a person should have to work like that. Soon other employers will follow suit. Working employee’s 24/7 365 will soon be the new norm.

Comments are closed.

John Gallagher

Based in Washington, D.C., John specializes in regulation and legislation affecting all sectors of freight transportation. He has covered rail, trucking and maritime issues since 1993 for a variety of publications based in the U.S. and the U.K. John began business reporting in 1993 at Broadcasting & Cable Magazine. He graduated from Florida State University majoring in English and business.