The EU, Brazil, Canada, Chile, India, Japan, Korea and Mexico requested a meeting by the WTO’s Trade Settlement Body to discuss potential sanctions against the U.S. Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000, known as the Byrd Amendment.
In January 2003, the WTO upheld complaints by U.S. trading partners that the redistribution of antidumping and countervailing duties to U.S. domestic producers was against WTO rules.
The U.S. had until Dec. 27 to bring the Byrd amendment into conformity with WTO rules, a deadline that expired with no compliance by U.S. Congress.
The European Commission said U.S. companies in the ball bearing, metal, household item, food and other industries received $231 million in payments in 2001 and about $330 million in 2002 under the antidumping legislation.
“It is clear that the Byrd Amendment is a WTO-incompatible response to dumping and subsidization and must therefore go,” said EU trade commissioner Pascal Lamy. “I hope the U.S. will now take action to remove this measure, thus avoiding the risk of sanctions.”
In seeking the authorization to retaliate against the U.S. legislation, the EU proposed that the level of the duty should be linked to the disbursements made to U.S. producers under the Byrd amendment during the previous year. It did not disclose which products would be targeted by EU duties.
The United States plans seek WTO arbitration in the matter. “The retaliation being sought by the other complaining parties does not appear to be based on actual harm to their exports,” said John Veroneau, general counsel for the U.S. Trade Representative’s Office, in a statement.
The Byrd amendment, named for sponsor Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va. and passed by Congress in 2000, authorizes the government to pay antidumping duties to U.S. companies that petition for them. Prior to the rulemaking, this money ended up in the general treasury.
The WTO Dispute Settlement Body will meet on Jan. 26. It is expected to approve trade sanctions against the United States. If the United States contests the validity of the requests, the matter will be referred to arbitration, which will normally be completed within 60 days.
The dispute on the U.S. antidumping and subsidy question follows last year’s tensions over U.S. steel import duties, also ruled illegal by the WTO. The steel duties were eventually removed by the Bush administration, removing the threat of retaliation by the EU.
Brokerage Compliance Symposium
The day before F3. Every compliance issue you face - fraud exposure, carrier liability, FMCSA rules, cargo theft, insurance gaps - navigated by attorneys and operators defining best practices in a changing industry.
F3 Awards Dinner
The night before F3. FreightTech100 companies honored. FreightTech 25 and Shipper of Choice winners revealed live. Cocktail reception into dinner and live music - 300 industry leaders in one purpose-built room.
F3: Future of Freight Festival
Industry-defining keynotes, rapid-fire technology demos, and industry leaders networking in experiences across Chattanooga - plus the inaugural F3 Awards Dinner featuring the FreightTech and Shipper of Choice reveals.
The day before F3. Every compliance issue you face - fraud exposure, carrier liability, FMCSA rules, cargo theft, insurance gaps - navigated by attorneys and operators defining best practices in a changing industry.
The Signal at Chattanooga Choo Choo • Chattanooga, TN Register NowThe night before F3. FreightTech100 companies honored. FreightTech 25 and Shipper of Choice winners revealed live. Cocktail reception into dinner and live music - 300 industry leaders in one purpose-built room.
The Signal at Chattanooga Choo Choo • Chattanooga, TN Register NowIndustry-defining keynotes, rapid-fire technology demos, and industry leaders networking in experiences across Chattanooga - plus the inaugural F3 Awards Dinner featuring the FreightTech and Shipper of Choice reveals.
The Signal at Chattanooga Choo Choo • Chattanooga, TN Register Now