• ITVI.USA
    15,415.310
    54.710
    0.4%
  • OTLT.USA
    2.761
    -0.007
    -0.3%
  • OTRI.USA
    21.110
    -0.300
    -1.4%
  • OTVI.USA
    15,387.520
    55.710
    0.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.ATLPHL
    3.300
    0.000
    0%
  • TSTOPVRPM.CHIATL
    3.140
    0.190
    6.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.DALLAX
    1.590
    0.150
    10.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXDAL
    3.330
    0.020
    0.6%
  • TSTOPVRPM.PHLCHI
    2.170
    0.020
    0.9%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXSEA
    4.080
    0.130
    3.3%
  • WAIT.USA
    125.000
    -1.000
    -0.8%
  • ITVI.USA
    15,415.310
    54.710
    0.4%
  • OTLT.USA
    2.761
    -0.007
    -0.3%
  • OTRI.USA
    21.110
    -0.300
    -1.4%
  • OTVI.USA
    15,387.520
    55.710
    0.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.ATLPHL
    3.300
    0.000
    0%
  • TSTOPVRPM.CHIATL
    3.140
    0.190
    6.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.DALLAX
    1.590
    0.150
    10.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXDAL
    3.330
    0.020
    0.6%
  • TSTOPVRPM.PHLCHI
    2.170
    0.020
    0.9%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXSEA
    4.080
    0.130
    3.3%
  • WAIT.USA
    125.000
    -1.000
    -0.8%
American Shipper

FMC TARGETS 81 OTIs FOR FAILURE TO POST INCREASED BONDS

FMC TARGETS 81 OTIs FOR FAILURE TO POST INCREASED BONDS

   Eighty-one ocean transportation intermediaries face the possibility of losing their licenses to operate in the U.S. foreign trades for failing to post increased bonds required by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act.

   The FMC cited 20 freight forwarders for failing to increase their proof of financial responsibility from $30,000 to $50,000, plus $10,000 for each unincorporated branch office.

   The commission also cited 53 non-vessel-operating common carriers for failing to increase the bonds from $50,000 to $75,000, plus $10,000 for each unincorporated branch office.

   An additional seven firms operating as both forwarders and NVOs were cited by the FMC for failing to meet both forwarding and NVO bonding requirements.

   One non-U.S. based NVO was cited by the FMC for failing to increase its bond from $50,000 to $150,000 and for failing to indicate the location of its electronically published tariff.

   None of the firms have been issued new licenses by the FMC.

   Firms which want an FMC hearing must make such a request to the agency by Feb. 12.

   The parties were asked to file papers explaining why the FMC should not revoke their licenses for failing to comply with the new OSRA bonding requirements.

      A final FMC ruling will be handed down by August 13.

We are glad you’re enjoying the content

Sign up for a free FreightWaves account today for unlimited access to all of our latest content

By signing in for the first time, I give consent for FreightWaves to send me event updates and news. I can unsubscribe from these emails at any time. For more information please see our Privacy Policy.