• ITVI.USA
    15,707.730
    81.870
    0.5%
  • OTRI.USA
    23.490
    0.230
    1%
  • OTVI.USA
    15,707.910
    79.950
    0.5%
  • TLT.USA
    2.800
    0.010
    0.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.ATLPHL
    3.390
    -0.060
    -1.7%
  • TSTOPVRPM.CHIATL
    2.840
    -0.080
    -2.7%
  • TSTOPVRPM.DALLAX
    1.510
    -0.070
    -4.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXDAL
    3.290
    0.080
    2.5%
  • TSTOPVRPM.PHLCHI
    1.980
    -0.060
    -2.9%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXSEA
    3.900
    0.100
    2.6%
  • WAIT.USA
    124.000
    -3.000
    -2.4%
  • ITVI.USA
    15,707.730
    81.870
    0.5%
  • OTRI.USA
    23.490
    0.230
    1%
  • OTVI.USA
    15,707.910
    79.950
    0.5%
  • TLT.USA
    2.800
    0.010
    0.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.ATLPHL
    3.390
    -0.060
    -1.7%
  • TSTOPVRPM.CHIATL
    2.840
    -0.080
    -2.7%
  • TSTOPVRPM.DALLAX
    1.510
    -0.070
    -4.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXDAL
    3.290
    0.080
    2.5%
  • TSTOPVRPM.PHLCHI
    1.980
    -0.060
    -2.9%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXSEA
    3.900
    0.100
    2.6%
  • WAIT.USA
    124.000
    -3.000
    -2.4%
American Shipper

HELLMANN, PELORUS FILE COMPLAINT WITH FMC AGAINST COSCO

HELLMANN, PELORUS FILE COMPLAINT WITH FMC AGAINST COSCO

   Hellmann Worldwide Logistics Inc. and Pelorus Ocean Line Ltd., a non-vessel-operating common carrier, have filed a complaint with the U.S. Federal Maritime Commission against COSCO Container Lines Co. Ltd. for allegedly charging rates differing from those negotiated in a service contract with Pelorus in April 1999.

   Pelorus said it booked cargo under the service contract with COSCO, which subsequently invoiced Hellmann, acting as Pelorus' agent, for amounts differing from the service contract's freight rates.

Hellmann and Pelorus contend that COSCO violated section 10(b)(2)(A) of the Shipping Act of 1984 by charging rates differing from those listed in the effective service contract or tariff; section 10 (b)(10) of the act by unreasonably refusing to deal or negotiate and in refusing to return complainants' overpayments; and section 10(d)(1), by engaging in unjust and unreasonable practices with respect to the filing of service contract amendments, collection of freight charges and failure to reimburse freight overpayments.

   The two companies are seeking $184,802.80 in reparations from COSCO, in addition to interest, costs and attorneys fees.

   The FMC has assigned the proceeding to the office of Administrative Law Judges and an initial decision is expected by Feb. 21, 2003.

We are glad you’re enjoying the content

Sign up for a free FreightWaves account today for unlimited access to all of our latest content

By signing in for the first time, I give consent for FreightWaves to send me event updates and news. I can unsubscribe from these emails at any time. For more information please see our Privacy Policy.