• DATVF.VSU
    1.369
    0.089
    7%
  • DATVF.DALLAX
    1.049
    0.080
    8.3%
  • DATVF.VWU
    1.715
    -0.019
    -1.1%
  • DATVF.SEALAX
    1.306
    -0.001
    -0.1%
  • DATVF.ATLPHL
    1.773
    0.050
    2.9%
  • DATVF.LAXDAL
    1.690
    0.099
    6.2%
  • DATVF.VNU
    1.570
    0.043
    2.8%
  • DATVF.PHLCHI
    0.996
    0.029
    3%
  • DATVF.VEU
    1.625
    0.059
    3.8%
  • DATVF.LAXSEA
    2.124
    -0.038
    -1.8%
  • DATVF.CHIATL
    2.107
    0.099
    4.9%
  • ITVI.USA
    10,297.120
    -58.780
    -0.6%
  • OTRI.USA
    8.320
    0.070
    0.8%
  • OTVI.USA
    10,315.280
    -58.610
    -0.6%
  • TLT.USA
    2.610
    0.010
    0.4%
  • WAIT.USA
    158.000
    8.000
    5.3%
  • DATVF.VSU
    1.369
    0.089
    7%
  • DATVF.DALLAX
    1.049
    0.080
    8.3%
  • DATVF.VWU
    1.715
    -0.019
    -1.1%
  • DATVF.SEALAX
    1.306
    -0.001
    -0.1%
  • DATVF.ATLPHL
    1.773
    0.050
    2.9%
  • DATVF.LAXDAL
    1.690
    0.099
    6.2%
  • DATVF.VNU
    1.570
    0.043
    2.8%
  • DATVF.PHLCHI
    0.996
    0.029
    3%
  • DATVF.VEU
    1.625
    0.059
    3.8%
  • DATVF.LAXSEA
    2.124
    -0.038
    -1.8%
  • DATVF.CHIATL
    2.107
    0.099
    4.9%
  • ITVI.USA
    10,297.120
    -58.780
    -0.6%
  • OTRI.USA
    8.320
    0.070
    0.8%
  • OTVI.USA
    10,315.280
    -58.610
    -0.6%
  • TLT.USA
    2.610
    0.010
    0.4%
  • WAIT.USA
    158.000
    8.000
    5.3%
Company earningsMaritimeShipping

Why are Capesize dry bulk shipping rates still sliding?

Another day, another downward slip in spot rates for the workhorses of dry bulk shipping known as Capesizes — larger vessels with a capacity of at least 100,000 deadweight tons (DWT), usually around 180,000 DWT.

Capesizes had a great run in the third quarter. Rates rose from $20,000 a day in late June to almost $48,000 a day in early September. But then they came back down to $20,000 a day by early November.

Given the breakeven rate of around $13,000 a day, it’s still a strong market, but the margin continues to narrow.

As of Nov. 21, Clarksons Platou Securities estimated that Capesizes rates were $18,350 per day, down 10% week-on-week and 26% month-on-month.

What’s nudging rates lower and what will bring them back? Current market conditions were addressed on two quarterly conference calls on Nov. 21, as the largest U.S.-listed Capesize owners – Golden Ocean (NASDAQ: GOGL) and Star Bulk (NASDAQ: SBLK) – reported third-quarter results.

Demand variables

On the demand side of the equation, executives continue to blame Brazil for rate weakness. The main drivers of Capesize rates are Chinese iron-ore imports from Australia and Brazil. Since the route from Brazil is triple the distance versus the trip from Australia, it soaks up three times as many Capes to carry the same volume.

Birgitte Ringstad Vartdal, outgoing CEO, Golden Ocean. Photo courtesy of John Galayda/Marine Money

According to Birgitte Ringstad Vartdal, the outgoing CEO of Golden Ocean (she announced her resignation hours before the call), “At the start of the fourth quarter, it looks like [Brazilian iron-ore miner] Vale [NYSE: VALE] is struggling a bit with its production system and there has also been a lot of early rain in Brazil. Vale has reduced its guidance for the fourth quarter and has guided a moderate production level in the first quarter.

“In the spot market, we see ships on the Australia-China route being fixed constantly, every day, but we see a lack of volume on the Brazil-China route,” she continued, noting that this “should reduce the number of vessels that are willing to ballast toward Brazil.” In other words, after Capesizes unload iron ore or coal in Asia, they should be less willing to sail empty all the way back to the Atlantic, which should eventually reduce bulker capacity in that basin and bolster rates.

Starting in the first quarter of 2020, Star Bulk CEO Petros Pappas believes Capesizes will get a demand boost as a result of new fuel regulations. The IMO 2020 rule will require all ships not equipped with exhaust-gas scrubbers to switch from 3.5% sulfur fuel oil to more expensive 0.1-0.5% sulfur fuel oil as of Jan. 1.

Pappas believes this will cause cargo demand to “cascade” upward from smaller-size bulkers to Capesizes. Smaller ships are not installing as many scrubbers, so they will have to use more expensive fuel, which he expects will induce more slow steaming by these vessels and reduce their effective capacity. Larger ships will be “more economical” and will see higher demand, he predicted.

Supply variables

What has perplexed some market watchers is that Capesize rates are falling at a time when so many of these vessels are supposed to be out of service for scrubber installations. That should have pushed rates higher due to fewer in-service Capes vying for spot voyage deals.

One explanation is that Capesize installations have been pushed back in the queue, with container ships getting served first. If true, the dry bulk supply reductions would increase going forward. In other words, the tailwind for rates is still coming. It hasn’t yet been fully felt.

Jefferies shipping analyst Randy Giveans. Photo courtesy of John Galayda/Marine Money

Jefferies analyst Randy Giveans falls into this camp.

He told FreightWaves, “I expect a bounce up in December as more Capes go off-hire for scrubbers, other vessels stop to clean out fuel tanks in preparation for the switch [to 0.5% fuel] and iron-ore cargoes ramp up from both Brazil and Australia. I wouldn’t be surprised if Capes exceed $25,000 a day and even touch $30,000 a day at some point in the next six weeks.”

Pappas sees Capesize scrubber installations extending well into the first quarter, “which is good because the first quarter is always the slowest quarter and this time it should be much better compared to previous years.”

Another possible explanation for falling fourth-quarter rates despite scrubber-installation downtime is that Capes being pulled from service for scrubber installations are being counterbalanced by new capacity from two sources: newbuilding deliveries and bulkers pushed into the spot market because of disincentives in the time-charter market.

There was a mini-spike in bulker orders in the fourth quarter of 2017 and the first quarter of 2018. Those vessels are now hitting the water. According to Vartdal, “[Newbuilding] deliveries increased in the third quarter of this year, contrary to the normal trend, and there was hardly any scrapping [demolition of older ships], so the fleet actually increased more in the third quarter than earlier in the year.”

According to Pappas, “During the first 10 months of the year, 35 million DWT were delivered and 7 million DWT were sent for demolition for a net fleet growth of 28 million DWT or 3.3%.”

Meanwhile, more ships are vying for spot contracts because there are fewer vessels on time charters. As previously reported by FreightWaves, the IMO 2020 rule is causing pushback in the time-charter market. In a spot contract, the vessel operator pays for fuel; in a time-charter contract, the charterer does. Because the post-Jan. 1 fuel price is so uncertain, charterers are waiting on the sidelines to see what happens.

“My impression is that charterers are reluctant to take a position at the moment,” explained Vartdal. “There has been little activity on the time-charter market now because of the preparations for IMO 2020. I think that once you are through January and tanks are cleaned and fuel is shifted, you will see more activity coming back in the period [time-charter] market.

“Charterers are not chartering in vessels at the moment because with a time charter, the charterer has to fuel the vessel. This period [the fourth quarter] is when all owners are cleaning tanks and changing fuel. I think the charterers prefer just to wait and do spot voyages instead.”

She also noted that owners would rather keep ships in the spot market during the IMO 2020 transition. “It’s not just that the charterers are not willing to take the risk. It’s also that we would like to have control of the actual change of fuel. When we are into 2020 and ships either have a scrubber or they have changed fuel, you will see more activity in the charter market,” she predicted.

Golden Ocean results

Golden Ocean reported net income of $36.7 million for the third quarter of 2019 versus net income of $35.3 million in the same period last year. Adjusted earnings per share came in at $0.28, slightly better than the consensus forecast for $0.25 per share.

The company operates a fleet of 79 bulkers with an aggregate capacity of 10.9 million DWT: 48 Capesizes, 28 Panamaxes (65,000-90,000 DWT), two Ultramaxes (60,000-65,000 DWT) and one Supramax (45,000-60,000 DWT).

It obtained an average rate for all vessel classes of $19,727 per day in the most recent quarter, up 70% from the second quarter of this year and up 11% from the third quarter of last year.

In keeping with an industry-wide trend toward higher dividends, Golden Ocean announced a $0.15 per share dividend for the third quarter, up from $0.10 per share in the second quarter.

Star Bulk results

Star Bulk reported net income of $5.8 million for the third quarter of 2019 versus net income of $26.1 million in the same period last year. Adjusted earnings per share of $0.18 were in line with the consensus forecast.

The company has a fleet of 118 bulkers totaling 13 million DWT: 17 Newcastlemaxes (200,000-210,000 DWT), 21 Capesizes, seven post-Panamaxes (90,000-100,000 DWT), two Panamaxes, 35 Kamsarmaxes (82,000 DWT), 17 Ultramaxes and 19 Supramaxes.

Star Bulk reported average rates of $14,688 per day for the most recent period, roughly flat versus the third quarter of 2018. It currently has 68% of its available days booked for the fourth quarter at an average rate of $16,284 per day. For its larger Capesize and Newcastlemax ships, it has 64% of fourth-quarter available days booked at an average of $23,599 per day.

Star Bulk President Hamish Norton. Photo courtesy of John Galayda/Marine Money

The central focus of analysts was the decision by Star Bulk to restart its dividend policy. It is paying out $0.05 per share for the latest quarter under a floating dividend policy through which it returns effectively all of its surplus cash flow to stockholders.

Star Bulk President Hamish Norton affirmed on the conference call, “We’ve designed this dividend policy in order to be able to follow it for the long term. Frankly, our hope is that by sticking to this dividend policy, investors will be well rewarded and will value the company appropriately, and if it’s valued appropriately, we will then have the currency [i.e. shares that can be used for acquisitions] to pursue accretive opportunities without walking away from this dividend policy — ever.”  More FreightWaves/American Shipper articles by Greg Miller  

Tags
Show More

Greg Miller, Senior Editor

Greg Miller covers maritime and finance for FreightWaves. He took a circuitous route to get here: After graduating Cornell University, he fled upstate New York's harsh winters for the island of St. Thomas, where he rose to editor-in-chief of the Virgin Islands Business Journal. In the aftermath of Hurricane Marilyn, he escaped the tropics for the safety of New York City, where he served as senior editor of Cruise Industry News. He then spent 15 years at the shipping magazine Fairplay in various senior roles, including managing editor. He currently resides in Manhattan with his wife and two Shi Tzus.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Close