A WTO panel rejected all of China's claims against the United States, finding it acted consistently with its WTO obligations in imposing the additional duties. The appellate body, in turn, rejected all of China's claims on appeal.
'We have said all along that President Obama's decision to impose duties on Chinese tires was fully consistent with our WTO obligations,' said U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk, in a statement.
![]() |
| Kirk |
China alleged the ITC's determination regarding market disruption and the level and duration of the additional duties were inconsistent with the WTO's Protocol of Accession and the 1994 GATT. In addition, China alleged the section 421 of the 1974 Trade Act definition of 'significant cause' was in inconsistent with the Protocol of Accession. A WTO panel sided with the United States and rejected all of China's claims in a report circulated in December 2010. China then appealed the panel's findings regarding the ITC determination.
