Third straight decline in benchmark diesel as futures trend higher

BOA report says oil market is facing a ‘sobering reality’

The benchmark diesel price is down for the third straight week. (Photo: Jim Allen\FreightWaves)

The weekly benchmark diesel price used for most fuel surcharges recorded its third straight decrease after weeks of higher numbers, but the recent direction of futures prices suggest the pullback may not continue.

The Department of Energy\Energy Information Administration average weekly retail diesel price fell 5.2 cents/gallon to $5.351/g, published Tuesday and effective Monday. 

That’s a decline of 29.2 cts/g over the last 3 weeks in the benchmark price used to set most fuel surcharges. But futures prices have turned higher, the AAA price was up today for the first time in more than 2 weeks, and there’s little bearish news out of the Strait of Hormuz. The price released Tuesday could be a bottom for this cycle. 

The price has declined 29.2 cts/g over the last three weeks, which means it is that much under the highest price in the cycle since the start of the war in Iran and the broader Middle East. The price published by the DOE/EIA right before the recent downturn was $5.643/g on April 6. 

The record high in the DOE/EIA series, which goes back to 1994, is $5.81, set in June 2022. 

The settlement price of ultra low sulfur diesel (ULSD) on the CME commodity exchange reached its highest level since the war began on March 27, when it settled at $4.4955/g. It settled slightly below that on April 7, at $4.4744/g. 

ULSD plummeted a day later, more than 66 cts/g, on announcement of a ceasefire, settling at $3.8084/g. Prices have made a steady move higher since then, despite a market that has been up and down on any given day’s news on the possible reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. 

ULSD crossed the $4/g mark in trading Monday before settling just under that. It exceeded the $4 mark again Tuesday before a slight decline by 11 a.m. Tuesday.

What comes next

There has been enough stability in current markets that extreme talk of an eventual $200/b price for Brent crude, the world’s benchmark, has mostly faded.

But what hasn’t faded are growing concerns that oil prices may be sticking at higher levels for awhile, regardless of whatever developments occur with the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.

The energy research team at Bank of America summed up that view in a recent report.

The team led by Francisco Blanch said in the report that the oil market “is facing a sobering reality.”

The “quick resolution scenario—with the assumption that full oil flows would be restored in Hormuz in short order—seems now highly unlikely,” the report said.

The report noted that the physical oil markets remain tight. However, dated Brent, which is a physical crude barrel for short-term delivery in contrast to Brent traded on futures market for June delivery, is now only about $5-$6/b more than Brent on commodity exchanges. That gap was about $10/b until recently.

“The physical oil market continues to tighten as a large share of global seaborne volumes remains trapped in the Middle East and global oil markets remain in steep backwardation,” BOA said. 

Market structure tells a story

Backwardation is a market structure where the highest price in the market is oil for immediate delivery, with prices then declining as the forward curve goes out into the future. Backwardation is a structure that develops when a commodity market is tight, as the current one is.

Its opposite is called contango, and a market in perfect balance is in contango, with prices along the calendar rising gradually to reflect the cost of storage and the time value of money.

The BOA report said it has a base case of an end to military action, with oil flows “mostly normalizing” by the third quarter. Under that scenario, Brent would average $92.50 for the year. (Brent on the CME settled Monday at $108.23/b).

But that is the best case. What BOA called a “fragile ceasefire” would involve a more negative situation for oil consumers. 

“Under this case, military activity would be constrained but not eliminated, and Hormuz would remain heavily securitized, with limited crossings and thus rising oil prices,” the report said. “A strait that is neither fully open nor totally closed in 2Q/3Q may push Brent to average $120/bbl this year.”

More articles by John Kingston

Why truckers should care about DOL’s latest proposal on joint employers

Triumph Financial sets new metrics, has strong quarter in factoring

TFI’s Bedard optimistic about U.S. LTL, but some of its issues persist

John Kingston

John has an almost 50-year career as a journalist, most of them covering commodities and markets. The largest part of his career was spent at Platts, now part of S&P Global Energy. He created the Dated Brent benchmark, now the world’s most important crude oil marker. He was Director of Oil, Director of News, the editor in chief of Platts Oilgram News and the “talking head” for Platts on numerous media outlets, including CNBC, Fox Business and Canada’s BNN. He covered metals before joining Platts and then spent a year running Platts’ metals business as well. He was awarded the International Association of Energy Economics Award for Excellence in Written Journalism in 2015. In 2010, he won two Corporate Achievement Awards from McGraw-Hill, an extremely rare accomplishment. He was awarded the 2020 Abdullah Bin Hamad Al-Attiyah International Energy Award for Lifetime Achievement for the Advancement of International Energy Journalism.