Watch Now


Trucking industry slams FMCSA’s proposed electronic ID mandate

Carriers withholding support, PrePass warns of wasted investment

CVSA proposal aimed at improving roadside safety enforcement. (Photo: Jim Allen/FreightWaves)

A proposal meant to revolutionize roadside inspection by requiring fleets and owner-operators to equip their trucks with a new electronic identification system was roundly rejected by much of the trucking industry.

The advance notice of proposed rulemaking issued by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration in September responded to a request by the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance. CVSA contends that establishing a unique, universal electronic vehicle identifier for all commercial motor vehicles would boost safety by improving how roadside inspectors target unsafe vehicles and drivers.

“As industry continues to grow and more and more people take to the roads, it is imperative that we leverage technology where possible to improve the efficacy of our enforcement programs,” CVSA stated in its support comments.

Support from motor vehicle administrations, safety groups

The American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators fully supports the petition. It agrees with CVSA that a wireless ID embedded in every truck would give law enforcement the ability to conduct fewer but more efficient traffic safety stops while allowing compliant trucks to bypass weigh stations and other roadside checks.

The Truck Safety Coalition, which filed jointly with Citizens for Reliable and Safe Highways and Parents Against Tired Truckers, also backed the proposal, contending that it has for too long relied on an “honor system” when it comes to enforcing safety.

“Electronic IDs help provide overdue transparency and accountability in monitoring the safety and compliance of commercial motor vehicles in day-to-day operations,” the groups stated. “This rulemaking is a potential game-changer as no longer could a carrier and/or driver knowingly break rules intended to preserve public safety with no one the wiser.”


Trucking says no

But the petition was roundly rejected by an overwhelming majority of the more than 1,700 comments FMCSA received on the proposal — most of which were from owner-operators citing privacy concerns.

“Perhaps the most concerning aspect of this proposal is FMCSA’s failure to address the shortcomings and security risks associated with previous technology-based requirements, including the electronic logging device mandate,” said Todd Spencer, president of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, which represents many of those opposing the petition.

“There is little to no recognition of the concerns motor carriers and drivers have continuously expressed about privacy and data security, and there are no indications FMCSA has taken any meaningful steps to alleviate these concerns.”

Even the American Trucking Associations and the Truckload Carriers Association, whose members typically support technology aimed at improving safety, declined to back the proposal.

“There are numerous questions and concerns that must be addressed by FMCSA before ATA would offer its endorsement of unique electronic identification of commercial motor vehicles,” wrote ATA’s vice president for safety policy, Dan Horvath. “FMCSA should clearly determine if the concept of universal ID would provide for a safety benefit that outweighs the time and cost associated with finalizing and ongoing implementation of this rule.”

TCA President Jim Ward said his group is “reluctant” to support the petition without addressing issues around cybersecurity, data ownership, inspection policies and cost.

PrePass: Money and effort wasted?

But possibly the most adamant among organizations and associations opposing CVSA’s proposal is the PrePass Safety Alliance.

The nonprofit, public-private partnership has so far invested $900 million to deploy and maintain a voluntary vehicle identification system that over 725,000 trucks and more than 110,000 motor carriers are already paying for, according to the organization. PrePass wireless technology pre-clears qualified motor carriers, allowing them to bypass weigh station safety checks.

“Existing electronic weigh station bypass programs have made substantial investments at no cost to the states,” the organization asserted in its comments to CVSA’s proposal. “Motor carriers have voluntarily underwritten those investments via low-cost subscriptions to the bypass programs. The CVSA petition and the [proposed rulemaking] do not mention any possibility of integrating existing electronic weigh station bypass programs into the [universal ID] universe. Therefore, all these private investments must be considered terminated.”

Asked by FMCSA in the petition if the new ID system should broadcast driver information such as hours of service, CDL compliance and medical certification, PrePass said that requiring such sensitive data “would take a disastrous toll on the supply chain.”

The organization referenced a June survey conducted by Randall Reilly in which 27% of respondents said they would leave the trucking industry if the government required them to transmit such personally identifiable information.

“With a shortage of drivers already creating challenges to motor carriers, the supply chain, and American consumers, removing 27% of drivers would be catastrophic.”

Click for more FreightWaves articles by John Gallagher.

34 Comments

  1. AL

    All this
    mess going on now with the DOT wanting electronic logs makes me glad I retired from driving after 38 years. These people forcing companies and owner operators to install electronic log systems costing thousands of dollars each haven’t figured it out yet. All this cost to install electronics and over priced fuel gets passed on to the consumer. Yes people that means you and me. Also most driving accidents involving large trucks are caused by people driving cars that cut off trucks on the road. Had a lady told me one time oh I thought those trucks could stop faster because they have 18 brakes. Yeah right. 10 sets of brake shoes to stop 80,000 pounds not 18 and not to mention drivers get held up at shippers locations for hours on end on their own time waiting to load or unload. Yes I have seen many trucks that shouldn’t have been on the road but those are usually pretty easy to spot. People wonder why we have a driver shortage. Can’t make money sitting on your own time in a parking lot and the owner operator is the first one to pay out of pocket and the last to get paid. Do the math.

  2. Dan Scott

    Blanket mandates are never about what is stated on the surface- they’re ALWAYS about lining up a contract with a particular someone to make them rich(er). The id’s cannot prevent a damn thing, and don’t do a damn thing for safety improvement, all they’ll do is advertise a who a driver is for a particular truck for every truck that’s not exempt. The proposed id’s only make sense in the case of drivers who have proven to be unsafe, who consequently not only have a terrible csa score but are on the verge of cdl revocation, in which case the id would stand as a flag to closely monitor those drivers- that doesn’t require a blanket mandate, it only requires a targeted regulatory amendment. BUT. EVERYONE, from Mothers Against Tired Truckers all of us, including us drivers, WOULD be a lot damn safer if all these regulatory and safety fanatics, including the US DOT and every state DOT, got together to make damn sure truckers have a ell of a lot more safe places to park for breaks, overnights, and 34hr resets- with all the vacant and abandoned lots in towns and cities all across the lower 48 states, and all the weigh station and inspection sites which now stand vacant, with so many of them barricaded to block truck access, it’s senseless and stupid to put truckers in the position of scrounging to find safe parking and thereby having to run longer than should be necessary and risk hours of service violations and exhaustion just because they can’t find a damn parking place that isn’t already occupied. To make trucking safe, you’ve actually got to look at what causes it to be unsafe, cure the damn cause, not the symptom. Shippers impose tight schedules that ignore weather and road conditions and that impose blanket policies of no payment for service rendered or penalty charge if late pickup or delivery, policies which coerce carriers and drivers to disregard safe speeds or even to remain on the road when road conditions are bad enough that no truck should be on the road, THOSE are causes- target the damn regulations at the causes, not at the friggin symptom of the driver just trying to do the job he/she is being asked to do. Target bad drivers with the id if need be, but ffs, stop trying to turn the matter into blanket mandates and revenue generation schemes that don’t solve a damn thing, that don’t target root causes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

John Gallagher

Based in Washington, D.C., John specializes in regulation and legislation affecting all sectors of freight transportation. He has covered rail, trucking and maritime issues since 1993 for a variety of publications based in the U.S. and the U.K. John began business reporting in 1993 at Broadcasting & Cable Magazine. He graduated from Florida State University majoring in English and business.