• ITVI.USA
    15,415.310
    54.710
    0.4%
  • OTLT.USA
    2.761
    -0.007
    -0.3%
  • OTRI.USA
    21.110
    -0.300
    -1.4%
  • OTVI.USA
    15,387.520
    55.710
    0.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.ATLPHL
    3.300
    0.000
    0%
  • TSTOPVRPM.CHIATL
    3.140
    0.190
    6.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.DALLAX
    1.590
    0.150
    10.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXDAL
    3.330
    0.020
    0.6%
  • TSTOPVRPM.PHLCHI
    2.170
    0.020
    0.9%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXSEA
    4.080
    0.130
    3.3%
  • WAIT.USA
    125.000
    -1.000
    -0.8%
  • ITVI.USA
    15,415.310
    54.710
    0.4%
  • OTLT.USA
    2.761
    -0.007
    -0.3%
  • OTRI.USA
    21.110
    -0.300
    -1.4%
  • OTVI.USA
    15,387.520
    55.710
    0.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.ATLPHL
    3.300
    0.000
    0%
  • TSTOPVRPM.CHIATL
    3.140
    0.190
    6.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.DALLAX
    1.590
    0.150
    10.4%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXDAL
    3.330
    0.020
    0.6%
  • TSTOPVRPM.PHLCHI
    2.170
    0.020
    0.9%
  • TSTOPVRPM.LAXSEA
    4.080
    0.130
    3.3%
  • WAIT.USA
    125.000
    -1.000
    -0.8%
American Shipper

IMRA opposes proposed U.S.-Canada softwood lumber deal

IMRA opposes proposed U.S.-Canada softwood lumber deal

   The International Mass Retail Association, an alliance of retailers, has opposed a U.S. proposal to resolve a softwood lumber dispute with Canada.

   The U.S. proposal would end the current combined 27.5 percent antidumping and countervailing duties against Canadian softwood lumber and replace them with a cap of 31.5 percent on Canadian softwood lumber imports and a tariff of $200 per 1,000 board square feet for anything over the 31.5 percent. In addition, Canada would have to split about half of $1.7 billion collected in duties thus far.

   “This proposed deal is not only bad for Canada, but for U.S. retailers and consumers as well,” said Sanda Kennedy, president of the Association, which is based in Arlington, Va.

   “IMRA has long opposed the negotiation of an interim measure that would impose a quota and tariff on softwood lumber imports,” Kennedy said in a statement. “We fully believe that the deal as proposed by the U.S. will only lead to decreased supply from Canada and increased costs for U.S. consumers.

   “The only way for Canada to resolve this longstanding problem is to continue with its suits before the World Trade Organization and the North American Free Trade Agreement panel,” Kennedy explained.

We are glad you’re enjoying the content

Sign up for a free FreightWaves account today for unlimited access to all of our latest content

By signing in for the first time, I give consent for FreightWaves to send me event updates and news. I can unsubscribe from these emails at any time. For more information please see our Privacy Policy.