The department will investigate what went wrong in its pursuit of the case, in which it charged the parcel giant with conspiring to deliver illegal drugs.
Prosecutors in 2014 obtained a grand jury indictment against FedEx on charges it had knowingly accepted shipments of illegal pharmaceuticals from online pharmacies. Rather than settle out of court, FedEx decided to take the case to trial, choosing to have the case heard directly by U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer in San Francisco instead of a traditional jury trial.
Just four days into the trial, however, the Justice Departement abruptly dropped all charges despite alleging in its opening statements that FedEx took advantage of its “legitimate” corporate identity to engage in criminal behavior.
Breyer commended DOJ for its decision to drop the charges, noting that the defense was “factually innocent and did not have intent.”
“The act of dismissal is entirely consistent with government’s overarching obligations to seek justice, even at the cost of some embarrassment,” Breyer said in court.
One key to the case against FedEx, according to U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, Assistant U.S. Attorney John H. Hemann, was the “dozens and dozens” of internal e-mails that would supposedly show that FedEx knowingly shipped drugs for pharmacies that were “shady, sneaky” and “on the run” for over a decade.
FedEx, however, maintained that these e-mails were taken out of context and, more importantly, the company had been in constant communication with the DEA about the fraudulent pharmacies, even going as far as to suspend deliveries from any pill distributor identified by investigators as engaging in illegal action.
Now, the U.S. Attorney in San Francisco Brian Stretch has assigned the office’s deputy criminal chief to review the case, an investigation that could take as long as two months. He told Reuters the department will examine why prosecutors brought the case in the first place, what oversight supervisors provided and what role officials in Washington D.C. played.
“This is not a finger pointing exercise,” Stretch said in an interview last week. “This is an exercise with the singular purpose to find lessons learned, and apply them to current and future cases.”
Freight Fraud Symposium
Double brokering. AI deepfakes. Identity theft. Freight fraud is an existential threat to the industry. Get ahead of it.
Supply Chain AI Symposium
Past the hype. Join operators, founders, and enterprise leaders figuring out how to deploy AI in supply chain.
Future of Rail Symposium
Reshoring is rewriting freight demand. Join shippers, rail executives, and government officials to shape the next decade.
Double brokering. AI deepfakes. Identity theft. Freight fraud is an existential threat to the industry. Get ahead of it.
Rock & Roll Hall of Fame • Cleveland, OH Register NowPast the hype. Join operators, founders, and enterprise leaders figuring out how to deploy AI in supply chain.
The Old Post Office • Chicago, IL Register NowReshoring is rewriting freight demand. Join shippers, rail executives, and government officials to shape the next decade.
The Signal at Chattanooga Choo Choo • Chattanooga, TN Register Now