XPO settles 2 California worker classification cases for nearly $30M

On the key charge of whether the workers were independent contractors or employees, in an earlier filing, XPO’s response focused on the question of “control.” The workers, XPO said in a filing from August 2021, had the ability to accept or reject loads; could provide services to companies other than XPO; and could pay their second-seat workers whatever they wanted. The list of points made by XPO in the filing is a lengthy one, with “control” as the key determinant.

The points are now moot given the settlement. But in one of the settlement documents, the court said that XPO had raised arguments “that posed a risk to plaintiffs’ chance for success.”

“While the court declines to opine on the relative strengths of the parties’ arguments at this stage in the case, the court notes that XPO raised colorable arguments that posed a degree of risk to plaintiffs’ potential for success,” the settlement document said.

The Teamsters aided the suit against XPO, a longtime nemesis. In a prepared statement, the union declared the settlement a “significant victory for working people.”

James Hoffa, the outgoing Teamsters president, said in that statement, “Today, we commend these brave XPO drivers, who decided not to back down and instead fought hard to demand that XPO pay them the money they were rightfully owed.” 

Hoffa added, “If XPO and other companies didn’t misclassify and steal these workers’ wages, there wouldn’t be a shortage of drivers.” 

An XPO spokesman said the case had been settled at “very advantageous terms” for the company.

Attorneys’ fees in the settlement were set at approximately one-third.

The named plaintiffs in the larger settlement, $20 million, with a worker named Angel Omar Alvarez as the lead plaintiff, will see a division of the payout as follows: Five named plaintiffs will get $30,000 each and four others will receive $10,000. The settlement document in the Alvarez case said the settlement was only 40% to 50% of what the class expected to obtain.

Other members of the class action will be notified by mail of their eligibility to file for compensation from the remaining $12.3 million left after other payouts are completed.

The six named plaintiffs in the second case, with Victor Cortez Arrellano as the lead plaintiff, will each receive $10,000. The settlement figure of $9.5 million was said in the court document to be 18.5% of what was requested in the initial lawsuit. Other members of the class action also will be notified by mail to file for their part of the settlement.

More articles by John Kingston

Truck transportation jobs rose in September but not by much

Supreme Court denies review of AB5-related case but law still isn’t impacting California trucking

Echo Global being acquired by private equity firm Jordan Co.