The ‘ingenious strategy’ behind most truckers’ least favorite week of the year: International Roadcheck

truck fallen over

International Roadcheck Week is hardly the sexiest topic in trucking, but it is a darn-tootin’ important one. Inspectors in the U.S. and Canada halt tens of thousands of trucks for vehicle inspections for a few days every summer or early fall. They remove thousands of trucks and drivers from the road; in 2021, 16.5% of inspected vehicles were put out of service along with 5.3% of drivers.

It’s uncommon for truck drivers to actually get their vehicles inspected at random during most of the year. To avoid International Roadcheck Week, many truckers simply don’t drive during that period of time — which, presumably, means more unsafe vehicles and drivers on the road outside of the inspection blitz. It’s a question that ate at Andrew Balthrop, a research associate at the University of Arkansas Sam M. Walton College of Business. 

Around 5% fewer one-person trucking companies are active during International Roadcheck Week. But Balthrop and his fellow researcher, Alex Scott of the University of Tennessee, found a major upside to the inspection blitz — even with all the folks who avoid it. According to their working paper published in March 2021, vehicles are safer a month before and after the inspection period. There’s a 1.8% reduction of vehicle violations, according to Balthrop and Scott’s analysis. Surprise inspection blitzes don’t result in the same uptick of compliance. 

I caught up with Balthrop about his research last week at FreightWaves’ Future of Supply Chain conference, and we chatted again on the phone this week about his findings on International Roadcheck Week.

Enjoy a bonus MODES and a lightly edited transcription of our phone interview: 

FREIGHTWAVES: For our readers who are not aware of what Roadcheck Week actually is, can you explain a little bit about what it and why it is important to drivers and companies?

BALTHROP: “The International Roadcheck is part of an alliance between the inspectors in Canada and the ones in Mexico and the U.S. to have a unified framework for making sure trucks are safe to operate. That should make it easier to go across borders when you have this kind of unified structure.

“In the U.S., one of these CVSA inspection blitzes is the International Roadcheck that happens for three days in the summer. Usually it’s a Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday. And usually it’s the first week in June.

“And in it, they focus on Level One inspections, the North American Standard Inspection where they inspect the driver records, the hours of service, the licensure and I believe medical records as well. Then they inspect the truck. It’s an in-depth inspection where the inspector will actually crawl under the truck to look at various things. And these inspections, from the data that I’ve seen, take about a half an hour on average.

“During the Roadcheck Week, they’ll do about 60,000 inspections, so 20,000 a day. They’re going to pull over a lot of trucks, and this can cause a little bit of congestion at the weigh stations and the roadside inspections localities as the inspectors are doing these inspections.”

Roadcheck Week doesn’t catch all truck drivers, but it has a long-lasting benefit to safety

FREIGHTWAVES: So, can most drivers kind of expect to be pulled over? How likely is that?

BALTHROP: “There’s 1 million or 3 million trucks on the road, somewhere around there on any given day. With 20,000 inspections, most drivers still will not get inspected, but there’s going to be a higher proportion of drivers inspected. 

“You’re more likely to get inspected on these days. If you don’t have a recent inspection on your record, or if you have a bad recent inspection on your record, you’re more likely to be pulled over on these days.”

FREIGHTWAVES: Your research focused on that it’s just unusual that this inspection is announced, that it’s planned. We were talking before about how normally, if you’re trying to assure quality or compliance, you would not announce an inspection in advance. It would be more of a surprise-type situation. 

Can you walk us through why that’s so unusual, or what’s the rationale that you see behind announcing it in advance?

BALTHROP: “It is unusual, and on the surface, it doesn’t make much sense, but it turns out to be kind of an ingenious strategy. So I’ll walk through it here. 

“Over the course of a year, there’ll be 2 million inspections of 3 or 4 million trucks out there. The average rate of inspections is pretty low. It’s not uncommon for truckers to go years without having an inspection. With this low inspection intensity, the FMCSA has sort of a problem of, how does it get anybody to abide by the regulations?

“I’m a jaded economist, and I don’t worry or consider too much ethics and morality and all that kind of stuff. It comes down to incentives for drivers to follow these inspections. The incentives do guide behavior. So, how could the FMCSA incentivize drivers to follow these regulations more closely and adhere to the standards?

“They do this by announcing the blitz. This does two things. On one side, it allows everybody to prepare in advance. There’s a bunch of anecdotal evidence out there that people do prepare for these blitzes in advance. They will have their trucks inspected beforehand for any problems. They’ll time maintenance and upkeep in advance to make sure that their vehicles are in order. “They’ll be a little bit more cognizant of the driver-side regulations. One thing we notice in our study is that hours-of-service violations really drop during these extensions, because people see them coming. They don’t fudge the books in any way.”

Owner-operators can evade Roadcheck Week. Big carriers, not so much.

BALTHROP: “The issue with the announcement, on the flip side, is that it allows people to just dodge the inspection entirely. For a long time, people have talked about how owner-operators and smaller carriers time their vacations for this particular time. They could do this for a couple reasons. To avoid the hassle is a nice way to put it, but it also allows you to be noncompliant to avoid the high-intensity inspections.

“You have this balance here that on one side you get the behavior you want with people complying with regulations. That’s the behavior the FMCSA wants. But on the flip side, you get a bunch of people that are kind of outright dodging inspections.

“When you compare these two things on balance, the policy is actually pretty effective because you get a lot of people focused on maintaining their trucks and obeying the rules during that particular week. Especially with the vehicle maintenance stuff, that lasts a long time. 

“In our research, we saw that vehicle violations, a month before and up to a month afterwards, is when you still notice your vehicle violations. That trucks are kind of better maintained around these blitzes.

“The ingenious aspect of it is that the FMCSA, by concentrating their inspection resources all at one time and announcing it, they’re making it clear that they’re serious about enforcing these regulations and everybody prepares for it. For the number of inspections that are happening, you get fewer tickets than you would have otherwise expected.

“The FMCSA, they’re putting people through a little bit of a hassle, but they’re not having to write a bunch of tickets to get people to comply. They’re not really punishing a whole bunch of people because, by making this apparent that this is going to happen, people comply and the FMCSA gets what they want essentially without having to come down on carriers too hard.”

A convenient time for a vacation, indeed

FREIGHTWAVES: OK, interesting. And how does this pattern of shutting down, how does that compare for an owner-operator versus a driver for a big fleet?

BALTHROP: “If you’re a motor carrier with thousands of power units, you can’t just pack up and not do business on a particular day. They just don’t have that option. So they get inspected at a higher intensity, and you see the larger carriers kind of more focused on making sure that they’re prepared for these inspections. With so many inspections, the larger carriers are going to be inspected at higher rates. You can really damage your reputation if your equipment isn’t in order on this particular day. 

“Versus the smaller carriers, especially if you’re talking about a single-vehicle fleet, an owner-operator type, it is not that difficult to just not work for those three days. And so you see a lot about that. 

“In terms of what the roadway composition looks like, if we look at inspection data and relative to a typical day with the usual inspections, on these Roadcheck days, you have about 5% fewer owner-operators on the road than you otherwise would expect.”

FREIGHTWAVES: Wow. And when you say owner-operators, you also mean just like fleets with just —

BALTHROP: “One-vehicle fleets.”

FREIGHTWAVES: OK, that’s interesting.

BALTHROP: “You know, you see a little bit of effect with the smaller fleets, below six vehicles, but it basically disappears by the time you get to a hundred vehicles.

“This effect is being driven by smaller carriers staying off the road in terms of avoidance. You see this goes also how you would expect; it’s also older vehicles that stay off the road. This is correlated with carrier size. The larger carriers use newer vehicles and owner-operators tend to use some of the older vehicles. But it’s particularly the older vehicles that are off the road.

“This makes intuitive sense. Older vehicles are more costly to keep compliant. Maintenance is more costly, and they’ve been around longer so there’s time for more stuff to have broken essentially.

How a truck driver gets stopped for inspection

FREIGHTWAVES: Can you explain a little bit more, the idea of having this inspection history and why it would benefit a larger or small carrier?

BALTHROP: “Getting flagged for inspection is sort of random, but not totally. If somebody notices something obviously wrong with your truck, that’s ground for a more in-depth inspection. Or if you get pulled over for some other reason, this can be grounds for inspection of some type. 

“But there’s also the inspection selection service. The computer program that is random, that it randomly flags people in for inspection, but it’s based on your inspection history.

“So if your firm hasn’t been inspected recently, or if your carrier doesn’t have a very dense inspection history, you’ll be more likely to trigger that system to pull you in and have you inspected. If you have a dense inspection history, you’re less likely to get inspected.”

FREIGHTWAVES: So how do you get pulled over for inspection? As a person who only drives a passenger car, my main interaction with being pulled over is, I’m driving down the freeway or wherever, and I get stopped by the police. How does it work for a truck driver? How does getting pulled over or inspected work in that way?

BALTHROP: “The law is that you cannot pass a weigh station without pulling in and getting weighed. At that point they may flag you to be inspected. Now, in the past decade or two, there’s been a bunch of electronic devices that are installed in cabs. You may have heard of PrePass or Drivewise. This allows you to pass weigh stations. 

“I don’t have data on how many trucks have the in-cab devices. But from a trucking perspective, they’re so convenient that you don’t have to stop every time you cross a state line. I think the vast, overwhelming majority of trucks have some sort of one of these electronic devices. The DOT inspectors at these roadside inspection points have a dial they can twist essentially about how many people they want to inspect. 

“So during the roadcheck inspection week, they’ll crank that dial all the way up and pull everybody over. And if they get too backed up, they might crank it back down a little bit and so on.”

FREIGHTWAVES: OK, interesting. It reminds me of a highly sophisticated E‑ZPass.

A $10 million-plus expense to trucking companies every year … but it’s worth it if just one fatal crash is avoided

FREIGHTWAVES: Zooming out, when we hear about large truck crashes, something like a vehicle maintenance issue is not really the most sexy explanation. But just looking at the FMCSA data, in 29% of all truck crashes, a major factor is brake problems. So it seems like a lot of the truck crashes on the road are caused by vehicle maintenance, versus something like the driver using illegal drugs or some other sort of more dramatic explanation. Can you speak a little bit to why this sort of vehicle maintenance is important for safety in preventing large crashes?

BALTHROP: “We did a little bit of a back-of-the-envelope cost benefit analysis of this. Let me try and make sure I remember it clearly, but we have it in the paper that the cost of this on one side is that you have the compliance costs the firms are undertaking, and then you have to add to that the delay costs from doing this, and then the cost of the inspection itself, having to pay federal inspectors to do this.

“On the benefit side, it reduces crashes. So when we add up, just looking at the cost of what an inspection is, we don’t have a good idea of how to measure the compliance cost. It’d be fun to measure the delay cost, but I don’t have good enough price data on that to get at that cost. 

“But if you look at what the cost of an inspection is, it is something like $100 or $120 is what you would pay to have one of these inspections done privately. A lot of people do this in the run-up to inspections, and have it done privately so that you can fix whatever the problems are and be sure that you would pass the FMCSA inspection.

“With that $120 figure, if you aggregate that up to 60,000 inspections or whatever, and you take that in comparison, I’m going to give you a bad figure here, it’s on the order of $10 million. That is about the value of a statistical human life. Looking at this economically, it’s worthwhile if it saves one human life. If you identify just one faulty brake system that would’ve resulted in an accident, you’re getting some value out of the program. 

“When you add those other costs in there, we’re going to need to save a couple of lives, but in terms of cost benefit analysis with this kind of stuff, we’re usually looking at orders of magnitude differences in cost and benefits to say something for sure. 

“If you can save just a couple lives, this program will pay for itself.”

Time to start inspecting in the winter

FREIGHTWAVES: Then one last question: Is there any rationale for this program happening in the summer? 

BALTHROP: “I think part of it is that for the inspectors this gets much harder and much more miserable to do in winter conditions.”

FREIGHTWAVES: That makes sense.

BALTHROP: “Inspectors are less productive. One of the things that we talk about in the paper, that they have in addition to the International Roadcheck, is that they have Brake Week where they focus a little bit more on brake inspections. You have Operation Safe Driver a little bit later on in the summer, usually in September, where it’s a little bit more focused on passenger vehicles and how they drive around these trucks.

“But there’s not one in the winter time. There’s an unannounced brake check that usually happens in May, a surprise inspection that’s just one day. But you’re right in pointing out that it might be worthwhile having one of these in the wintertime. You have this periodic high-intensity inspection that kind of incentivizes everybody to be compliant through the summer. 

“But there’s nothing in the winter, so that’s an area. But if I was managing the FMCSA, that would be one of the first questions I ask, ‘Why don’t we have one of these in the wintertime?’”

FREIGHTWAVES: That makes sense. Maybe they can do it in the South or something. Maybe a Miami January inspection … 

That’s it for this special bonus MODES. Subscribe here if you’re not already receiving MODES in your inbox every Thursday. Email the reporter at rpremack@www.freightwaves.com with your own tales on International Roadcheck Week or any other trucking topics. 

Why the Northeast is quietly running out of diesel

The nozzle of a diesel fuel pump is inserted into the tank of a commercial truck as its driver looks on the bankground.

The East Coast of the U.S. is reporting its lowest seasonal diesel inventory on record. And some trucking companies appear spooked.

The East Coast typically stores around 62 million barrels of diesel during the month of May, according to Department of Energy data. But as of last Friday, that region of the U.S. is reporting under 52 million barrels. 

The sharp increase of diesel prices has been a major stressor in America’s $800 billion trucking industry since the beginning of 2022. According to DOE figures, the price per gallon of diesel has reached record highs — a whopping $5.62 per gallon. It’s even higher on the East Coast at $5.90, up 63% from the beginning of this year. 

When relief is coming isn’t yet clear, and experts say higher prices are the only way to attract more diesel into the Northeast.

“I wish I had some good news for the Northeast, but it’s bedlam,” Tom Kloza, global head of energy analysis at OPIS, told FreightWaves. 

2022 has seen record-setting diesel prices. (SONAR)

Everyday Americans don’t fill up their cars with diesel, but the fuel powers our nation’s agriculture, industrial and transportation networks. More expensive diesel means the price of everything is liable to increase. Trucks, trains, barges and the like consumed about 122 million gallons of diesel per day in 2020

Patrick DeHaan, a vice president of communications at fuel price site GasBuddy, reported that retail truck stops are hauling fuel from the Great Lakes to the Northeast, calling it “extraordinary.” We’ve also seen anecdotal reports from truck drivers posting company memos:

Pilot Flying J and Love’s, two of America’s largest truck stops, told the Wall Street Journal yesterday that they were not planning to restrict diesel purchases, but were monitoring low diesel inventory.

Not unlike every other supply chain crunch we’ve seen in the past few years, the cause of the Northeast’s diesel shortage is multifaceted. A yearslong degradation of refineries is rubbing against the Gulf Coast preferring to ship its oil to Europe and Latin America.

Here’s a breakdown:

1. The East Coast has lost half of its refineries. 

As Bloomberg’s Javier Blas wrote on May 4 (emphasis ours): 

In the past 15 years, the number of refineries on the U.S. East Coast has halved to just seven. The closures have reduced the region’s oil processing capacity to just 818,000 barrels per day, down from 1.64 million barrels per day in 2009. Regional oil demand, however, is stronger.

Rory Johnston, a managing director at Toronto-based research firm Price Street and writer of the newsletter Commodity Context, told FreightWaves that refining is a “thankless industry,” with intense regulations that have limited the opening of new refineries. The Great Recession of 2008 led to several East Coast refineries shuttering, but there have been more recent shutdowns too. One major Philadelphia refinery shuttered in 2019 after a giant fire (and it already had declared bankruptcy), and another refinery in Newfoundland shut down in 2020.

2. It’s a financial risk to bring diesel to the Northeast.

The Northeast has increasingly relied on diesel from the Gulf region. Much of that diesel travels to the Northeast through the famous and much-adored Colonial Pipeline. You may remember the 5,500-mile pipeline from last year, when a ransomware attack shuttered it for nearly a week!  

It takes 18 days for oil to travel on the Colonial Pipeline from its source in Houston to New York City (or, more specifically, Linden, New Jersey), Kloza said.

That’s a long enough time to prioritize Colonial pipelines financially risky for traders — or, as Kloza said, “incredibly dangerous” — thanks to a concept called “backwardation.”

Backwardation refers to the market condition in which the spot price of a commodity like diesel is higher than its futures price. It’s only gotten stronger over time in the diesel market, Kloza said. So, a company could send off a shipment of diesel and find that it dropped by $1 per gallon in the time the diesel traveled from the Gulf Coast to New York — er, New Jersey. That could mean hundreds of thousands or more in lost profits, so traders often avoid such a fate.

“We’re not in an era where there are any U.S. refiners or big U.S. oil companies who would ‘take one for the team’ and bring cargo in where it’s needed,” Kloza said. 

The desperation is showing in New England and the mid-Atlantic regions. New England diesel retail prices are up 75% from the beginning of 2022, per DOE data. In the mid-Atlantic, diesel is up 67%. 

It’s not worth the risk, even amid ultra-high prices. As FreightWaves’ Kingston reported last week, the spread between a gallon of diesel in the Gulf Coast and its New York harbor price is usually a few cents. Last week, that swung up to 66 cents.

But that uptick still isn’t justifying moving oil to the Northeast — particularly when traders can make so much more money selling diesel abroad. 

3. Of course, we can blame COVID and the crisis in Ukraine. 

The catalyst for this diesel shortage, of course, is the ongoing conflict in Ukraine — particularly Europe’s desperation for diesel after weaning off Russian molecules. 

As CNBC reported in March, Europe is a net importer of diesel. Europe consumed some 6.8 million barrels of diesel each day in 2019; Russia exported some 600,000 barrels per day of that. Today, Europe has only eliminated one-third of its Russian diesel, so prices are expected to continue to climb amid that transition. Latin America, too, has been clammoring for U.S. diesel.

The Gulf Coast has been happy to provide such diesel, amid “insane” prices for diesel abroad, said Johnston. Waterborne exports of diesel from the U.S. Gulf Coast hit record highs last month, according to oil analytics firm Vortexa. (The records only date back to 2016.)

Naturally, COVID is also to blame for the Northeast’s run on diesel. Those refineries still retained on the East Coast scaled back during the pandemic due to staffing issues. It takes six months to a year to reignite refineries that were previously shuttered, Kloza said.

The ‘everything shortage’ endures

It’s been a tale as old as, well, last year. An industry is quietly hampered by supply issues for years, or even decades, and COVID pulls back the curtains on its unsteady foundation. It’s particularly jarring for commodities we never thought about before, like shipping containers or pallets, but that quietly underpinned our livelihood all along. 

Recall the Great Lumber Shortage of 2020? Big Lumber had unusually low stockpiles of wood by the summer of 2020, thanks to a vicious 2019 in the lumber industry shuttering sawmills and the spring of 2020 sparking staffing issues. (There was also a nasty beetle infestation.) Those in lumber expected the pandemic to slow the economy, not ignite online shopping, construction and housing mania. It meant lumber went from around $350 per thousand board feet pre-pandemic to a crushing $1,515 by the spring of 2021. The lumber price roller coaster persists today.  

In diesel, there’s no beetle infestation, but there are plenty of other headaches. It all means higher fuel prices on the East Coast, particularly the Northeast, to lure molecules from the Gulf Coast. And, down the line, probably more expensive stuff for you. 

Do you work in the trucking industry? Do you want to say that you hate or love MODES? Are you simply wanting to chitchat? Email the author at rpremack@www.freightwaves.com, and don’t forget to subscribe to MODES.

Updated on May 13 with the latest comments from truck stops.

Exclusive: Central Freight Lines to shut down after 96 years

Nearly, 2,100 employees will be laid off right before Christmas. Central Freight Lines is the largest trucking company to close since Celadon ceased operations in 2019.


Waco, Texas-based Central Freight Lines has notified drivers, employees and customers that the less-than-truckload carrier plans to wind down operations on Monday after 96 years, the company’s president told FreightWaves on Saturday.

“It’s just horrible,” said CFL President Bruce Kalem.

A source close to CFL told FreightWaves that CFL had “too much debt and too many unpaid bills” to continue operating, despite exploring all available options to keep its doors open.

Kalem agreed.

“Years of operating losses and struggles for many years sapped our liquidity, and we had no other place to go at this point,” Kalem told FreightWaves. “Nobody is going to make money on this closing, nobody.” 

Central Freight will cease picking up new shipments effective Monday and expects to deliver substantially all freight in its system by Dec. 20, according to a company statement.

A source familiar with the company said he is unsure whether CFL will file Chapter 7 or “liquidate outside of bankruptcy,” but that the LTL carrier has no plans to reorganize.

The company reshuffled its executive team nearly a year ago in an effort to stay afloat, including adding the company’s owner, Jerry Moyes, as CFL’s interim president and chief executive officer. Moyes remained CEO after Kalem was elevated to president in July.

“I think it was surprising that there wasn’t a buyer for the entire company, but buyers were interested in certain pieces but not in the whole thing,” the source, who didn’t want to be identified, told FreightWaves. “Part of it could have been that just the network was so expansive that there was too much overlap with some of the buyers that they didn’t need locations or employees in the places where they already had strong operations.”

Third-party logistics provider GlobalTranz notified its customers that it had removed CFL as “a blanket and CSP carrier option immediately, to prevent any new bookings,” multiple sources told FreightWaves on Saturday.

CFL, which has over 2,100 employees, including 1,325 drivers, and 1,600 power units, is in discussions with “key customers and vendors and expects sufficient liquidity to complete deliveries over the next week in an orderly manner,” a CFL spokesperson said. Approximately 820 employees are based at the company headquarters in Waco.

Despite diligent efforts, CFL “was unable to gain commitments to fund ongoing operations, find a buyer of the entire business or fund a Chapter 11 reorganization,” another source familiar with the company told FreightWaves.

Kalem said the company had 65 terminals prior to its decision to shutter operations. 

FreightWaves received a tip from a source nearly two weeks ago that CFL wasn’t renewing its East Coast terminal leases but was unable to confirm the information with CFL executives. 

Another source told FreightWaves that some of the LTL carrier’s West Coast terminals had been sold recently, but that no reason was given for the transactions.

At that time, Kalem said the company was “working to find alternatives” and couldn’t speak because of nondisclosure agreements. He said executives at CFL, including Moyes, were trying to do everything to “save the company.”

“Jerry [Moyes] pumped a lot of money into the company, but it just wasn’t enough,” Kalem said.

Kalem said he’s aware that a large carrier is interested in hiring many of CFL’s drivers but isn’t able to name names at this point. 

“Central Freight is in negotiations to sell a substantial portion of its equipment,” the company said in a statement. “Additionally, Central Freight is coordinating with other regional LTL carriers to afford its employees opportunities to apply for other LTL jobs in their area.”

As of late Saturday night, Kalem said fuel cards are working and drivers will be paid for freight they’ve hauled for the LTL carrier until all freight is delivered by the Dec. 20 target date.

“I’m going to work feverishly with the time I have left to get these good people jobs — I owe it to them,” Kalem told FreightWaves. “We are going to pay our drivers — that’s why we had to close it like we’re doing now. We are going to deliver all of the freight that’s in our system by next week, and we believe we can do that.”

During the outset of the pandemic, Central Freight Lines was one of four trucking-related companies that received the maximum award of $10 million through the U.S. Small Business Administration’s Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). This occurred around the time that CFL drivers and employees were forced to take pay cuts, a move that didn’t go over well with drivers.

“It all went to payroll,” Kalem said about the PPP funds. “Yes, our employees and drivers did take a pay cut over the past few years, and we gave most of it back, even raised pay over the past several months, but it just wasn’t enough to attract drivers.”

FreightWaves staffers Todd Maiden, Timothy Dooner and JP Hampstead contributed to this report.


Watch: Central Freight Lines’ impact on the LTL market


FreightWaves CEO and founder Craig Fuller reacts to the Central Freight Lines news:

“With Central struggling for many years and unable to reach profitability, it makes sense that they would want to liquidate while equipment and real estate are fetching record prices.”


Central Freight Lines statement

Here is the statement given by Central Freight Lines to FreightWaves late Saturday after reports surfaced of its impending closure:

“We make this announcement with a heavy heart and extreme regret that the Company cannot continue after nearly 100 years in operation. We would like to thank our outstanding workforce for persevering and for professionally completing the wind-down while supporting each other. Additionally, we thank our customers, vendors, equipment providers, and other stakeholders for their loyalty and support.

“The Company explored all available options to keep operations going. However, operating losses sapped all remaining sources of liquidity, and the Company’s liabilities far exceed its assets, all of which are subject to liens in favor of multiple creditors. Despite diligent efforts, the Company was unable to gain commitments to fund ongoing operations, find a buyer of the entire business, or fund a Chapter 11 reorganization. Given its limited remaining resources, the Company concluded that the best alternative was a safe and orderly wind-down. As we complete the wind-down process, our primary goal will be to offer the smoothest possible transition for all stakeholders while maximizing the amount available to apply toward the Company’s obligations.

“Central Freight is in negotiations to sell a substantial portion of its equipment. Additionally, Central Freight is coordinating with other regional LTL carriers to afford its employees opportunities to apply for other LTL jobs in their area. Discussions are ongoing and no purchase of assets or offer of employment is guaranteed.”


Brief history of Central Freight Lines

1925Founded in Waco, Texas, by Woody Callan Sr.
1927Institutes regular routes in Texas between Dallas, Fort Worth and Austin.
1938Dallas facility opens as world’s largest freight facility.
1991Receives 48-state interstate operating authority, expands into Oklahoma.
1993Joins Roadway Regional Group and begins service in Louisiana.
1994Expands into Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, Illinois and Mississippi.
1995Consolidation of Central, Coles, Spartan and Viking Freight Systems into Viking Freight Inc. is announced. Central’s Waco corporate HQ starts closure.
1996Becomes the Southwestern Division of Viking Freight Inc.
1997Investment group led by senior Central management purchases assets of former CFL from Viking Freight and reopens as a new Central Freight Lines.
1999Expands into California and Nevada.
2009CFL Network provides service to Idaho, Utah, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
2013Acquires Circle Delivery of Tennessee.
2014Acquires DTI, a Georgia LTL carrier.
2017Acquires Wilson; new division created with an increase of 80 terminals.
2020Wins Carrier of the Year from GlobalTranz.
Acquires Volunteer Express Inc. of Dresden, Tennessee.
Source: Central Freight Lines

Warehouse cramming is about to begin — Freightonomics

nVision Global, is a leading Global Freight Audit, Supply Chain Management Services company offering enterprise-wide supply chain solutions. With over 4,000 global business “Partners”, nVision Global not only provides prompt, accurate Freight Audit Solutions, but also providing industry-leading Supply Chain Information Management solutions and services necessary to help its clients maximize efficiencies within their supply chain. To learn more, visit www.nvisionglobal.com

Warehouse space is at a premium right now and with peak season right around the corner, shippers are starting to scramble for space. 

Zach Strickland and Anthony Smith look into what shippers are doing to prepare for the end-of-year crunch. They welcome Zac Rogers from Colorado State University to the show to talk through the industry tightness. 

The three also talk about the latest Logistics Managers Index results and what they mean for the fourth quarter of 2021. 

You can find more Freightonomics episodes and recaps for all our live podcasts here.

Seasonality pushing rejections and rates higher ahead of the Fourth

This week’s DHL Supply Chain Pricing Power Index: 75 (Carriers)

Last week’s DHL Supply Chain Pricing Power Index: 70 (Carriers) 

Three-month DHL Supply Chain Pricing Power Index Outlook: 70 (Carriers)

The DHL Supply Chain Pricing Power Index uses the analytics and data in FreightWaves SONAR to analyze the market and estimate the negotiating power for rates between shippers and carriers. 

The Pricing Power Index is based on the following indicators:

Load volumes: Absolute levels positive for carriers, momentum neutral

The Outbound Tender Volume Index at 15,980 is nominally higher now than basically at any point in the past 12 months with the exception of the week prior to Thanksgiving/Black Friday last year. OTVI captures all electronic tenders, including rejected ones, so when accounting for the rejection rate, we can get an even more accurate look at volumes. 

OTVI rose through the back half of May into the national holiday and has risen even further since. Throughout the back half of May and into the middle of June, tender rejections declined substantially. Meaning, current volume throughput is actually understated when comparing OTVI now to OTVI in November 2020. After adjusting for rejected tenders, the accepted outbound tender volume index is just 2.2% below the 2020 peak in November. At that time, OTVI surged towards 17,000, but the rejection rate moved in-kind towards its natural ceiling of 28%. So, the total accepted freight tenders in mid-June is comparable to the peakiest of peak seasons in 2020. Incredible. 

However, since the middle of June, tender rejections have begun increasing again heading into Independence Day, a time when many drivers spend time off the road with their families. The move higher in OTVI this week has been driven primarily by higher rejection rates, rather than higher freight demand. 

Over the past month, the drivers of freight volumes have continued to be imports and from just about every port. The west coast continues to provide seemingly non-stop container ships, while Houston, New Orleans, Miami and Savannah are seeing very strong throughput as well. 

It is van volumes that are driving freight markets higher right now. The Reefer Outbound Tender Volume index has tumbled 25% since its all-time high in the weeks after the polar vortex in February. Since Memorial Day, ROTVI has fallen another 10.5%. This is likely a factor of declining grocery demand, but I would expect the trend to reverse course in the near future as summer festivities accelerate. 

Dry van volumes pushed higher in the back half of May and into June while reefer volumes have declined significantly. 

SONAR: VOTVI.USA (Blue); ROTVI.USA (Green)

The congestion at our nation’s ports has spread from Los Angeles and Long Beach to Oakland, California. The California coastline is a parking lot of container ships, most of which are full to the brim with imports, awaiting berth. As detailed in the economic section, there are some signs that the reversion is underway with Americans paring back spending on pandemic superstar categories in favor of airlines, lodging and entertainment. But spending remains strong despite the moderation, and low inventory levels offset much of the decline that will occur from slowing demand. Real inventories are 3% higher now than pre-pandemic, but real sales growth is far outpacing inventory growth, leading to the lowest inventory-to-sales ratio in decades. 

On the manufacturing side, the ISM Manufacturing PMI expanded in May after declining in April. We’ve been in expansionary territory for 12 consecutive months. New orders, production, imports/exports and employment are all growing. The major issues should come as no surprise: Deliveries are slowing, backlogs are growing and inventories are too low. 

In all, there are many, many catalysts to keep freight demand strong for the foreseeable future. Americans are traveling and spending on services at a high clip, but the high savings rate is enabling it to occur without a massive detriment to goods spending. 

SONAR: OTVI.USA (2021 Blue; 2020 Green; 2019 Orange; 2018  Purple)

Tender rejections: Absolute level and momentum positive for carriers

After declining steadily from mid-March to mid-May, the Outbound Tender Reject Index has reversed course heading into Independence Day. This is typical for a national holiday as carriers selectively choose loads to bring drivers closer to home. OTRI now sits above 25% for the first time in June. 

One of our newest indices in SONAR gives us the ability to compare markets on as close to an apples-to-apples basis as possible. FreightWaves’ Carrier Trend Market Score indices are divided into two perspectives – shipper/broker and carrier. The scores are positioned on a scale from 1-100 and have values measuring van and refrigerated (reefer) capacity. The higher values represent more favorable trends for whichever perspective. For instance, a value near the high-end of the range would suggest very favorable conditions for carriers in our carrier capacity trend score index. 

For the past several weeks, capacity disparities have been driven by import volumes. The markets with the tightest carrier capacity coincide with the nation’s busiest ports. Ontario, California, Savannah, Georgia, and Atlanta all have carrier capacity trend market scores of 100. 

SONAR: Capacity Trend Market Score (Carriers – VAN)

By mode. Reefer rejection rates tumbled from it’s all-time high in March to under 35% in mid-June before popping higher over the past two weeks. Reefer rejections are still quite high from a historical standpoint at 38%, but are significantly lower than just three months ago when reefer carriers were rejecting half of all electronically tendered loads. 

SONAR: VOTRI.USA (Blue); ROTRI.USA (Orange)

Dry van tenders make up the majority of all tenders, so the van rejection rate mirrors the aggregate index closely. Van rejections have surged from ~23% to ~26% over the past two weeks. 

Yes, one-in-four loads being rejected is not ideal, but it’s better than 30%. I am unaware of any meaningful signals that capacity is being added at a rate that would change my outlook. With so many catalysts for demand, and many constraints on drivers including the Drug & Alcohol Clearinghouse, driver training school closures and continued government unemployment benefits, the outlook is tight throughout this year and into 2022. That’s not to say we won’t see improvement as consumers revert to pre-pandemic spending habits and drivers enter or reenter the market. But I’m not expecting any quick reversal of this environment; there are simply too many catalysts driving volume and suppressing capacity. 

SONAR: OTRI.USA (2020/21 Blue; 2020 Green; 2019 Orange)

Freight rates: Absolute level and momentum positive for carriers

Throughout June, spot rates have moderated while contract rates have pushed higher. The Truckstop.com dry van rate per mile (incl. fuel) has fallen from $3.21 to $3.11 since the beginning of June, while FreightWaves van contract rates have risen from $2.50 to $2.59/mile, exclusive of fuel. 

I still believe the Truckstop.com dry van national average will not retest the post-vortex surge pricing that brought spot rates up to an all-time high of $3.30. But, there aren’t many catalysts to bring spot rates down anytime soon either. Demand is unwavering with continued strong consumer goods demand, humming industrial recovery and a potentially cooling, yet still sizzling, hot housing market. And carriers can’t fill enough trucks to keep up with demand. 

Prior to the seasonal movements we’re seeing in tender rejections, routing guides generally had been improving through Q2. We should continue to see a convergence between spot and contract rates, but spot rates will remain historically very elevated throughout the summer as demand simply outstrips capacity. 

SONAR: TSTOPVRPM.USA (Blue); VCRPM1.USA (Green)  

Economic stats: Momentum and absolute level neutral

Several economic releases this week are worth noting.

Weekly jobless claims were released Thursday and give us one of the best close-to-real-time indicators of the overall economy.  This week, the data was again very promising as the labor market continues on a bumpy but trajectorially stable recovery path. 

First-time filings totaled 411,000 for the week ended June 19, a slight decrease from the previous total of 418,000 but worse than the 380,000 Dow Jones estimate, the Labor Department reported Thursday. Initial claims have held above 400,000 for consecutive weeks after falling to a pandemic low of 374,000 three weeks ago. As things stand, the current level of initial claims is about double where it was prior to the Covid-19 pandemic. 

The good news on the jobs front is that continuing claims are on the decline, falling to 3.39 million, a drop of 144,000. That number runs a week behind the headline claims total.

Initial jobless claims (weekly in May 2020-May 2021)

At the time of writing, the newest weekly data for the week ending May 29 had not been updated in SONAR. This week, claims fell from 405,000 to 385,000. 

SONAR: IJC.USA

Consumer. Turning to consumer spending, as measured by Bank of America weekly card (both debit and credit) spending data, total card spending (TCS) in the latest week accelerated to 22% over 2019. This is the first time in June that TCS has topped 20% over 2019, but spending has been running up 16-19% consistently on a two-year comp for months. For contect, the average pre-pandemic two-year growth rate was about 8% (from 2012 to 2019). 

The Bank of America team highlighted service spending in the nation’s two largest state economies, California and New York, which are now fully reopened. Spending at restaurants is now well above 2019 in both states, and the team believes there is more capacity for spending to accelerate in the states that were slower to reopen given pent-up demand. 

There was also a notable acceleration in spending on clothing this week, according to Bank of America. It could be a reversal from some softening in the early weeks of June, or an indication of people refreshing wardrobes ahead of a return to work, more travel and vacations. One tepid statement for freight markets from this week;s report: Leisure spending is on the rise and durable goods spending is flatlining.  

FreightWaves’ Flatbed Outbound Tender Reject Index, both a measure of relative demand and capacity, moves directionally with the ISM PMI. 

SONAR: ISM.PMI (Blue); FOTRI.USA (Green) 

Manufacturing. Over the past two weeks, regional manufacturing surveys have reported generally positive readings amid logistical challenges. The New York Fed’s Empire State business conditions index declined 6.9 points to 17.4 in June, retreating from strong readings the past two months. The Empire State Index is a diffusion index with a baseline of zero; any reading above zero indicates improving or expansionary conditions. 

Delivery times lengthened to a new record during the month, new orders and shipments fell, and inventories entered negative territory. The supply chain and transportation challenges are as visible upstream as downstream, but overall the manufacturing sector is handling. Growth continued throughout the second quarter in both the Empire State and Philly Fed indices. 

The Philadelphia Federal Reserve’s business activity index edged lower to a still robust 30.7 in June from 31.5 in the prior month. Unlike NY, the pace of shipments growth accelerated in the Philly region during June. The employment subcomponent rose to a very healthy 30.7 from 19.3 last month, the regional bank said. 

Record-long lead times, wide-scale shortages of critical basic materials, rising commodities prices and difficulties in transporting products are continuing to affect all segments of the manufacturing economy, but demand remains strong. 

For more information on the FreightWaves Freight Intel Group, please contact Kevin Hill at khill@www.freightwaves.com or Andrew Cox at acox@www.freightwaves.com.

Check out the newest episodes of our podcast, Great Quarter, Guys, here.

Project44 acquires ClearMetal to strengthen predictive tools

Project44, a leader in real-time visibility of the global supply chain, announced on Thursday it has acquired ClearMetal, a San Francisco-based supply chain planning software company that focuses on international freight visibility, predictive planning and overall customer experience. The terms of the acquisition were not disclosed.

ClearMetal, founded by top software engineers and data scientists from Stanford, Google and other Silicon Valley elites, has created a “continuous delivery experience” that leverages proprietary machine learning algorithms that can forecast supply chain disruptions. 

In an interview, Jason Duboe, chief growth officer at project44, explained that bringing in ClearMetal’s elite team is essential for the company’s future predictive solutions.

“Their team construct is fundamentally different. When you look at their data science, machine learning and computer science background, they are best in class,” he said. “Applying the team to solve really interesting challenges, starting with highly predictive ETA and deeper exception management to create more predictive analytics is really a key component here.”

Project44 recently acquired Ocean Insights to gain global supply chain vessel visibility and has announced it has expanded its truckload tracking services within Asia. Bringing on this new team of engineers will allow the company to capitalize on strong predictive tools, strengthening the supply chain of its customers.

“We’re going to be expanding deeper into Asia, and from a port perspective, getting data much earlier than competitors,” explained Duboe. “Our freight forwarder integrations will give us much deeper visibility from an end-to-end perspective in these regions.”

Along with the acquired skills the ClearMetal team will bring to project44, it brings a large book of customers, including large CPGs, retailers, manufacturers, distributors and chemical companies. These advanced use cases will strengthen the predictive planning tools, and project44 continues to expand into different customer markets.

“What we gain from ClearMetal is a holistic platform for anybody that joins the platform in the future,” said Duboe. “They have large customers with incredibly demanding and advanced use cases. So when it comes to order and inventory, functionality, supplier onboarding, and moving upstream into those processes, we can capture exceptions earlier on.”

Click here for more articles by Grace Sharkey.

Related Articles:

Project44 expands real-time visibility into China

Project44 reels in Ocean Insights in ‘largest acquisition in visibility space’

‘Project44’s vision has always been global’

Cassandra Gaines expands transport risk framework with BAVRA Standard for shippers

Just months after introducing a framework for carrier vetting, Carrier Assure founder and CEO Cassandra Gaines has released a companion standard aimed at another link in the transportation chain: how shippers select and oversee freight brokers.

The new BAVRA Standard — short for Broker Assessment, Verification, Risk and Accountability — is a 34-page framework designed to help shippers establish a “reasonable and defensible” process for selecting and monitoring brokers, freight forwarders, managed transportation providers and motor carriers that also hold brokerage authority. 

Gaines describes it as a companion to the CAVRA Standard, which focuses on reasonable motor carrier selection.

Unlike CAVRA, which asks whether a broker reasonably selected a motor carrier, BAVRA examines whether a shipper reasonably selected the transportation intermediary responsible for arranging freight.

Transportation decisions begin before freight moves

Gaines said the framework was developed to address what she views as a growing blind spot in transportation risk management: many shippers carefully vet suppliers across their business but perform only limited due diligence before entrusting freight to a broker.

“Transportation responsibility begins before a motor carrier arrives at a facility,” Gaines wrote in the introduction to the framework. She said that the initial decision to select a broker can influence public safety, cargo security, insurance recovery, customer service and ultimately which carrier and driver are placed on the highway.

According to Gaines, many shippers still rely primarily on confirming a broker’s operating authority, bond, insurance coverage and contract. 

While those are important baseline requirements, she said they do not answer a more important question: whether the broker has written carrier-vetting standards, operational controls, trained personnel and risk-management procedures appropriate for the freight being moved.

“The BAVRA Standard is intentionally specific,” Gaines wrote. “A shipper should not be told merely to hire a reputable broker, confirm authority, or rely on a contract.” 

Defining the “reasonable middle ground”

A recurring theme throughout the BAVRA Standard is that shippers should neither completely outsource transportation judgment nor become directly involved in managing brokers’ day-to-day operations.

Gaines describes BAVRA as defining “the reasonable middle ground between passive outsourcing and excessive operational control.” 

Under the framework, shippers are encouraged to establish written qualification standards, ask meaningful questions, monitor performance, investigate warning signs and audit broker practices while allowing brokers to remain independently responsible for selecting and managing motor carriers.

The BAVRA framework repeatedly emphasizes that companies should evaluate broker-selection decisions based on information reasonably available at the time rather than judging them solely by the outcome of an accident or cargo claim. 

At the center of the framework is what Gaines calls the “central BAVRA question:”

“Based on the information available at the time, did the shipper reasonably select and monitor a transportation provider capable of arranging the freight under written, risk-based and accountable procedures, or did the shipper ignore warning signs that a sophisticated shipper should have addressed?”

Broker selection and dock operations

Gaines has also expanded the discussion beyond broker qualification to include pickup verification at shipping facilities.

In promoting a recent webinar on shipper liability, she said many companies focus on selecting safe motor carriers but overlook risks that arise when freight is released to the wrong truck, driver or carrier at the loading dock.

“Pickup verification is not just a cargo theft issue, it becomes a public safety liability issue,” Gaines said, adding that mismatched carrier, driver, equipment or USDOT information can expose shippers to unnecessary legal risk.

Building on the CAVRA framework

The release of BAVRA follows Gaines’ publication in June of the CAVRA Standard, which established a framework for brokers, freight forwarders and shippers that directly hire motor carriers to evaluate carrier safety, fraud risks, identity verification and operational controls.

Gaines says the two standards are intentionally connected. Under BAVRA, sophisticated shippers should evaluate whether prospective brokers maintain carrier-qualification programs that align with CAVRA or an equivalent written standard. 

However, she stresses that shippers should not independently repeat every carrier review performed by the broker or assume responsibility for daily carrier-selection decisions.

The BAVRA framework encourages companies to adopt written broker-qualification policies, establish audit procedures, define escalation triggers and document why transportation providers were selected in the first place.

Gaines said her goal is not to expand liability for shippers but to provide practical guidance for transportation professionals navigating an increasingly complex legal environment.

“Transportation becomes safer and more accountable when companies stop assuming that outsourcing a function means outsourcing all judgment,” she wrote. “The goal is education, transparency, consistency, accountability, appropriate role separation, and practical guidance for the sophisticated shippers deciding who will arrange the transportation of their goods.”

Why it matters: As courts continue to scrutinize transportation decisions beyond the motor carrier itself, the BAVRA Standard seeks to give shippers a practical framework for demonstrating that broker-selection, pickup verification and transportation oversight decisions were reasonable, documented and risk-based before a shipment ever leaves the dock.

Shipper liability takes another Texas setback; CHRW plays offense

The legal push to hold shippers liable for an accident involving a truck hauling its goods when it did not hire the carrier directly has taken another blow in a Texas court.

But the mere existence of the case, alongside the nuclear verdict against C.H. Robinson in the case of Lipe vs. Lupus Superior, are just more fuel in the legal battlefield over who beyond the obvious parties will be held liable and negligent, and pay for damages arising out of the wreck. 

In the Lipe case, as the legal world awaits the affirmation of the $604 million verdict by the Dallas County Judge Dianne Jones in the case, C.H. Robinson (NASDAQ: CHRW) has gone on the offensive, this week publishing a question & answer document as a reiteration of past statements and a retort to various rumors that have been flying around the industry. C.H. Robinson also reaffirmed its determination to appeal the verdict against it, which impacted the company because it hired the carrier that was involved in a fatal crash.

The Texas case that recently brought victory to shippers was handed down last week in the Court of Appeals for the Eighth District in El Paso. That court upheld an earlier decision in the Texas court system that blocked claims against aircraft manufacturer Atlas Aerospace. 

Earlier losses for the plaintiffs

It was Atlas’ freight that was being hauled through Kansas in 2018 by Dorado’s Trucking (which in turn had been booked by a broker named Essen Global Logistics) when it was involved in a fatal collision resulting in two deaths.

Plaintiffs in the case–the deceased men’s relatives–sought to have Atlas held vicariously liable for the crash. They had not been successful in those efforts in the lower courts, and have now failed in their effort at a higher Texas court.

It’s the second recent decision in a Texas court where vicarious liability against a shipper was rejected. In May, an attempt to hold Home Depot negligent over the actions of a Werner (NASDAQ: WERN) truck driver that was hauling goods for the chain when it was involved in a fatal crash near Houston in 2024 was rejected by the Texas Supreme Court. There are echoes of that case in the recent decision involving Atlas Aerospace. 

In the Atlas litigation, its position as a defendant was severed from the other ongoing case involving the carrier and the broker. (That now-separate action has so far gone in favor of the drivers and carriers and is in appeal).

Atlas had won on summary judgment earlier in the case. In the latest decision favoring Atlas, handed down on the final day of July, the court favored Atlas again on several points. 

One of them was a fairly thorough demolition of the argument that the shipper who had contracted out the movement of its freight should be held liable, much like in the Home Depot case.

“Even in the light most favorable to the Mora family (the lead plaintiffs who lost a family member in the crash), we conclude they presented no evidence sufficient to raise a fact issue on whether Atlas exercised any control over which trucking company was hired, which tractors were used to haul the trailers, or which drivers were selected as Atlas’s products were transported from Mexico to Kansas,” Judge Gina Palafox wrote in her decision for the three-judge panel.  “The Mora Family’s summary judgment evidence of Atlas’s alleged control is so weak as to amount to no more than a scintilla of evidence, and, at most, rises to the level of controlling ‘merely the end sought to be accomplished’—that their products be transported from Mexico to Kansas,” quoting an earlier precedent.

While Atlas did participate in some aspects of the shipment, such as recommending routes for the transportation of goods from Mexico, the court said there was no evidence Atlas controlled that decision. 

Judge: not an active role

“We conclude the Mora Family’s argument conflates affirmative acts and passive omissions,” Judge Palafox wrote. “Preventing something requires active conduct—taking steps to stop or obstruct an outcome—while not opting in simply reflects a choice to not participate, which lacks the affirmative quality necessary to constitute prevention absent a legal duty to act.”

The parallels between the Atlas case and the judgement in Lipe vs. Lupus Superior case, which dragged in C.H. Robinson, goes to the issue of vicarious liability for an entity that is two or more degrees of separation from the actual incident that led to a lawsuit.

C.H. Robinson hired Lupus Superior in the tragic crash in 2021 when a truck from that company crashed into a group of cars, killing three people and the driver. 

The more than $600 million judgement drew particular attention not only because it is one of the biggest nuclear verdicts in trucking history, but it was the first one after the Supreme Court ruling in Montgomery vs. Caribe Transport II where a broker defendant could not use the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act in its defense. 

It also was a verdict against a company with deep pockets, but one in which a $600 million payout would be far from a small blip on its finances.

Out in front

Since the decision by a Dallas County Court jury, C.H. Robinson has been on the offensive in launching a push in the court of public opinion to defend itself beyond its legal arguments.

CEO Dave Bozeman tackled the case in the company’s recent second quarter earnings call. And earlier this week, the company published a question and answer document on its view of Lipe vs. Lupus Superior.

Much of what was in the document has been discussed by C.H. Robinson earlier. It reiterated that it is appealing the judgement. The broker described the crash as “heartbreaking.” It noted that Lupus Superior had a Satisfactory rating from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration both before and after the 2021 crash in Mississippi. 

C.H. Robinson also reiterated that despite a jury finding that it was effectively the driver’s employer, it has never hired a driver. And it repeated that C.H. Robinson had used Lupus Superior for 270 loads without incident.

“We strongly disagree with the jury’s conclusions,” C.H. Robinson said. “We did not employ the driver, choose the driver, contact the driver, operate the truck, or control the actions of the driver involved in the accident.”

The one new issue raised in the Q&A was to tackle industry rumors. 

“Claims that the driver told C.H. Robinson he was sick, that we allowed him to continue driving, or that we didn’t reschedule the load are also false,” the document said. “What is true is that the driver worked for Lupus Superior, he did not communicate with C.H. Robinson, and we did not supervise, direct, or control his actions. After the carrier told us their driver had stopped, we rescheduled the load for four days later. Unbeknownst to C.H. Robinson, the driver continued driving.”

More articles by John Kingston

Werner CEO Leathers: just the 3rd inning in driver attrition

C.H. Robinson earnings call shifts to nuclear verdict as key topic

Louisiana: Motta request rejected, murder trial nears

Pamt Corp. books another net loss, 110.6% adjusted TL OR

A Pam Transportation rig on the highway

Truckload carrier Pamt Corp. continues to cut its fleet to restore profitability.

Pamt (NASDAQ: PAMT) reported a second-quarter net loss of $7.4 million, or 36 cents per share, Tuesday evening. Excluding the impact from a one-time accrual related to prior auto liability claims, earnings per share were 25 cents. (Pamt booked a net loss of 46 cents per share in the year-ago period.)

The second quarter marked Pamt’s seventh consecutive quarterly net loss.

The company had roughly 6 cents per share in net headwinds that were not excluded from the EPS number. Lower gains on equipment sales (14 cents per share) and higher interest expense (2 cents per share) were headwinds compared to the 2025 second quarter. Higher non-operating income, which is mostly the change in value of its stock portfolio, was a 10-cent tailwind.

Consolidated revenue increased 9% year over year to $165 million. Revenue was up just 2% excluding fuel surcharges.

Table: Pamt’s key performance indicators

The truckload unit saw a 7% y/y revenue decline (ex-fuel) as average trucks in service fell 4% and revenue per truck per week was down 3%. Loaded miles per truck increased 15% y/y in the quarter. Revenue per loaded mile (ex-fuel) was off 5% y/y, but up 4% from the first quarter.

“For the first time in more than three years, market conditions enabled a meaningful sequential increase in rate per total mile,” said Pamt President Lance Stewart. “This marks an important step toward addressing rates that have been pressured lower while inflationary cost pressures have persisted.”

The company’s fleet count was just under 2,000 units in the period, down from over 2,400 tractors three years ago.

The TL unit booked a 114.2% operating ratio (inverse of operating margin) but the OR was 110.6% excluding the one-time insurance accrual. The adjusted number was 190 basis points better y/y.

The quarter marked 11 straight operating losses for the TL unit.

“As industry dynamics continue to constrain driver supply, we believe opportunities for further rate correction remain, and we have achieved additional progress through the date of this release,” Stewart said.

SONAR: Van Contract Rate Per Mile Index (VCRPM1.USA) for 2026 (blue shaded area), 2025 (yellow line), 2024 (green line) and 2023 (pink line). The index shows a 7-day moving average of the initial reporting of dry van contract rates without fuel or accessorial charges. To learn more about SONAR, click here.

The logistics unit reported $51 million in revenue, a 24% y/y increase. The unit saw 230 bps of margin improvement, booking a 96.4% OR.

Pamt doesn’t provide gross profit margins for the unit, nor operating metrics like load counts and revenue per load.

Pamt used $16.7 million in operating cash flow in the first half of the year. Liquidity (cash, equity holdings and availability on its line of credit) of $117 million was $24 million lower than in the first quarter. Outstanding debt increased $12 million to $333 million.

The company announced that Daniel Kleine was appointed chief financial officer on Thursday. Kleine joined Pamt three years ago as vice president of tax. He most recently served as the company’s senior vice president of finance and treasurer.

Why it matters? Pamt’s results show how some carriers are cutting fleet counts to return to or improve profitability.

More FreightWaves articles by Todd Maiden:

First look: GXO books strongest sales quarter in three years 

GXO Logistics reported second-quarter 2026 financial results Tuesday that showed continued momentum in contract logistics despite a cautious global freight environment.

Revenue increased 4.3% year over year to $3.4 billion, while organic revenue rose 3.4%, reflecting growth across all three of the company’s geographic regions. 

Chief Executive Officer Patrick Kelleher said the company is benefiting from three strategic priorities: strengthening its commercial organization, improving operational execution through its “GXO Way” operating model, and expanding artificial intelligence and next-generation automation through its GXO IQ platform.

“Our commercial momentum is particularly evident in North America, a key growth market, where our wins in the first half of the year increased 85% over the same time last year,” Kelleher said in a news release.

Greenwich, Connecticut-based GXO Logistics (NYSE: GXO) is one of the largest pure-play contract logistics providers in the world. It has more than 970 facilities totaling approximately 200 million square feet, with a global workforce of more than 130,000 people. 

GXO also secured approximately $410 million in new business wins during the quarter, a 34% increase from a year earlier and the company’s strongest quarterly commercial performance in three years. About 40% of those wins came from aerospace and defense, technology, industrial and life sciences.

Adjusted EBITDA increased to $219 million, up from $212 million a year ago, while adjusted diluted earnings per share rose to 59 cents, compared with 57 cents in the second quarter of 2025.

GAAP net income totaled $27 million, compared with $28 million a year earlier, while diluted earnings per share slipped slightly to 22 cents from 23 cents.

Cash generation also improved significantly. Operating cash flow reached $76 million, versus $3 million in the prior-year quarter, while free cash flow totaled $12 million, compared with negative $43 million during the second quarter of 2025.

GXO said it has already secured approximately $1 billion of incremental revenue for 2026, up 29% year over year, along with $353 million of incremental 2027 revenue. The company also noted its commercial sales pipeline expanded from $2.3 billion at the end of the second quarter to approximately $2.7 billion in July, providing increased visibility into future growth.

The company maintained the midpoint of its 2026 financial outlook, projecting:

  • Organic revenue growth of 4% to 5%
  • Adjusted EBITDA of $945 million to $965 million
  • Adjusted diluted EPS of $2.95 to $3.15
  • Free cash flow conversion of 30% to 40%

GXO will hold a conference call with analysts at 8:30 a.m. EST on Wednesday.

GXO Q2 2026 financial highlights

MetricQ2 2026Q2 2025YoY
Total revenue$3.4 billion$3.3 billion+4.3%
Net income$27 million$28 million(4%)
Adjusted EBITDA$219 million$212 million+3.3%
Adjusted diluted EPS$0.59$0.57+3.5%

AI hardware, Asia demand lift Lufthansa cargo revenue 27%

A ground view of a tank truck fueling a Lufthansa Cargo jet at night.

The cargo division of Deutsche Lufthansa AG (FRA: LHA) posted a 26% gain in adjusted operating profit during the second quarter as strong shipping demand in Asia and from AI-driven cloud service providers, boosted revenue despite volatile market conditions and higher fuel costs associated with the U.S.-Iran war.

In recent months, Lufthansa Cargo launched a full-service, cross-border e-commerce logistics subsidiary through the merger of two in-house companies and completed the first phase of a massive modernization project at its main hub at Frankfurt airport. 

The growth and new investments led Chief Financial Officer Gregor Schleussner on Tuesday to declare that Lufthansa Cargo would return to the top echelon of cargo airlines by the end of the decade. 

“Companies that want to succeed in the long term must be faster, more efficient, and more adaptable than their competitors. This is why we continue to work hard to create the foundation for Lufthansa Cargo’s next phase of development through our Bold Moves strategy. Our goal is clear: by 2030, we aim to return to the ranks of the world’s top three cargo airlines,” he said in a news release issued in conjunction with Group financial results.

Lufthansa Cargo is currently the No. 14 carrier in the world, by traffic volume, according to the International Air Transport Association. It operates 12 Boeing 777 freighter aircraft and is able to market capacity on six 777s operated by AeroLogic, a joint venture between Lufthansa and DHL Express, for a total of 18 widebody freighters under its control. It also manages the belly capacity of sister airlines Lufthansa Airlines, Austrian Airlines, Brussels Airlines, Discover Airlines and SunExpress to transport freight. 

FreightWaves reported on Monday that Lufthansa Cargo has quietly abandoned plans to reinstate four Airbus A321 standard-size freighters pulled from European and North Africa regional service in April. The company didn’t provide a reason for souring on the aircraft, but analysts suspect it has to do with operating and market characteristics that make it difficult to fly them at a profit.

Lufthansa Cargo revenue grew 27% during the second quarter to 1 billion euros (equivalent to $1.2 billion). Operating income grew 26% to $1.21 billion, and on an adjusted basis was up 58% to $133.6 million. During the first half, revenue was up 16% and profit margin rose 2.2 points to 10.4%.

Second-quarter demand remained strong, up 3%, despite disruptions and economic uncertainty associated with fighting in the Middle East. Lufthansa benefitted from flight reductions at Middle Eastern competitors such as Emirates and Qatar Airways Cargo and the shift of some ocean freight to air as businesses sought more predictable transport, resulting in a 27% increase in yields, year over year. Fuel surcharges offset fuel expenses and brought in additional revenue, which positively contributed to yields.

The crisis triggered a surge in demand on passenger and freighter routes to Asia. Yields to Asia and on new intra-Asia routes increased by 30%, while yields to the Middle East rose even more. The company also attributed profitability to the increased focus on high-margin industry sectors like pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, automotive, and artificial intelligence.

“The increased need for transportation of server racks indeed has almost become an industry-shaping element. We are allocating and reallocating our network to serve our customers who try and who want to move server racks around the world,” Lufthansa Group CEO Carston Spohr said on a call with analysts. “As you can imagine, for these high-risk and very expensive equipment, logistical costs are almost immeasurable, so this is a very profitable business. You do need freighter aircraft for this business by the sheer size of these racks.” 

Robust demand for semi-conductors and AI-related hardware helped air cargo industry volumes grow 7% in June, according to research from Xeneta.

Available cargo capacity expanded by 2%, driven by 6% belly space in passenger aircraft, particularly from the marketing of capacity on ITA Airways. Lufthansa Group acquired a minority stake in the Italian carrier in 2025.

Hub modernization

Part of the premium strategy includes modernizing cargo infrastructure on the ground. 

Lufthansa is building a $682 million, 3.5 million square-foot cargo terminal with high bays for efficient pallet storage and automated transport system that will significantly expand cargo handling capacity and efficiency. The initial building, considered the most important phase, spans 860,000 square feet — equivalent to 11 soccer fields. 

Lufthansa Cargo boasts the terminal will be the most modern air cargo hub in Europe when completed in 2030.

The new facility features sophisticated warehouse management systems and conveyors to efficiently route goods, a fully automated 131-foot tall high-bay warehouse with nearly 3,000 storage slots for large pallets and an automated pallet warehouse for temperature-sensitive and specialized shipments. The high-bay section alone will enable more than 300 storage and retrieval operations per hour, doubling capacity, Lufthansa said in a news release.

The cargo airline also consolidated the activities of its heyworld GmbH and CB Customs Broker subsidiaries under the newly established brand GlobeCross. The new company combines e-commerce logistics service, including last-mile delivery, with customs clearance expertise to provide businesses with end-to-end transport for small parcel shipments. The strategy goes beyond the traditional airport-to-airport model for an airline so Lufthansa Cargo can capture additional business opportunities in the growing parcel logistics sector.

Overall, Lufthansa Group profits were dragged down by $864 million in extra fuel costs compared to last year. Operating profit fell 56% to $441 million and net income plunged nearly 90% to $141.7 million.

Click here for more FreightWaves/American Shipper stories by Eric Kulisch.

Write to Eric Kulisch at ekulisch@freightwaves.com.

Is Lufthansa giving up on its Airbus A321 cargo fleet?

Lufthansa Cargo to market capacity on ITA Airways, add Rome hub

New Australia airport has no curfew for cargo campus

Matson profit surges 30% on China shipping demand

Matson, Inc. (NYSE: MATX) reported second-quarter 2026 earnings that significantly exceeded Wall Street expectations, driven by robust demand and higher freight rates in its premium China service.

The Honolulu-based carrier posted net income of $129.4 million, or $4.27 per diluted share, up 36.6% and 46.2% respectively from the prior-year period, while raising its full-year operating income outlook.

Revenue totaled $969.4 million, up 16.7% from $830.5 million in Q2 2025. Operating Income was $158.9 million, an increase of 40.6%, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) came to $211 million, better by 28.9% from $163.6 million a year earlier.

Operating margin was 16.4%, from 13.1% in the prior-year quarter.

Earnings per share beat consensus estimates by approximately $0.45-$0.55 per share while revenue exceeded expectations by roughly $75 million.

China service drives record performance

Matson’s China service saw container volume surge 15.2% year-over-year to 37,200 forty-foot equivalent units (FEUs). Growth was fueled by tighter trans-Pacific capacity as international carriers carefully managed tonnage, avoiding large backlogs or significant blank sailings, which has supported higher rates

The Honolulu-based company said e-commerce, apparel, and e-goods showed particular strength, with freight rates exceeding expectations on its premium CLX and MAX services.

Cargo originating from Southeast Asia now represents 20–25% of China service volume, reflecting successful expansion beyond traditional China-origin shipments.

Ocean transportation segment operating income jumped 46% to $144 million, with revenue increasing 13.6% to $767.4 million.

Domestic Hawaii volume was off 1.1% and Alaska traffic slowed by 2.3%, the latter on lower export seafood volume.

Raised full-year outlook

Matson raised its full-year 2026 guidance; ocean transportation operating income in Q3 is expected to be approximately 45% higher than Q3 2025’s $147.4 million. Q4 is projected to be modestly lower than Q4 2025’s $136 million, reflecting a tough comparison to elevated demand following the U.S.-China trade agreement announced in October 2025.

Full-year 2026 consolidated operating income is expected to exceed the total $499.8 in 2025.

Chief Executive Matt Cox noted that the company expects its China service to operate at or near capacity through peak season, with demand reflecting more traditional seasonality patterns in the fourth quarter.

Read more articles by Stuart Chirls here.

Read more:

500K June boxes for Port of New York-New Jersey

Strong finish: Ocean lines raise profit outlook by 200%

Sugar strike that prompted ports shutdown ends, longshore union returns to negotiations

Chips to ships: Nvidia plans new shipbuilding investment with Kawasaki

Is pause in new ship orders by South Korean flag carrier a warning?

Trimac acquires California bulk food-grade transportation provider

a white Trimac daycab at a stoplight

Canadian bulk hauler Trimac Transportation announced Tuesday that it has acquired bulk food-grade logistics provider California Freight.

California Freight operates eight terminals, a warehouse and a brokerage office across California and Nevada. It provides transportation, storage and logistics services to food and agricultural companies, primarily across California’s Central Valley.

Its fleet includes approximately 500 tractors along with tank trailers that ship raw milk to processing facilities. It has over 400,000 square feet of food-grade storage space.

Financial terms of the transaction were not disclosed.

“With three decades of specialized expertise, their capabilities in food-grade transportation, warehousing and brokerage align directly with Trimac’s long-term growth strategy,” said Trimac President and CEO Matt Faure.

California Freight will continue operations under its current banner. Jesse Hanson, a sales and operations executive with Trimac, will take over as president at California Freight.

“California Freight has been dedicated to reliable service in the food and beverage and dairy sectors for a long time,” said Dave Sanders, California Freight vice president and founder. “Joining Trimac means our team and customers will be provided with even greater resources to serve those who have trusted us for decades.”

“Jim Aartman and Dave Sanders grew California Freight from just ten tanker trailers into one of the Central Valley’s leading raw milk and food-grade carriers,” said Ashesh Pansuria, director of M&A at Tenney Group. “For Trimac, this acquisition represents a strategic entry into the liquid food-grade transportation market, and they were committed to finding a best-in-class operator to establish that platform. They recognized the exceptional business Jim and Dave built over the years, and it was a privilege to represent them throughout this transaction.”

Tenney Group served as the exclusive sell-side advisor to California Freight throughout the transaction.

Why it matters? This acquisition allows Trimac to expand its specialized capabilities into the food-grade and dairy sectors, leveraging California Freight’s 37 years of industry expertise. This move aligns with Trimac’s long-term growth strategy by diversifying its portfolio beyond industrial commodities into high-demand agricultural logistics.

More FreightWaves articles by Todd Maiden:

Supply Chain: Why Ocean Rates Skyrocketed 300% in 5 Months

GEODIS Americas CEO Laura Ritchey reveals the stark reality of today’s “uneven” economy and its impact on supply chains. While some sectors thrive, others grapple with extreme ocean shipping delays, surging freight rates, and emerging challenges from data center infrastructure. Learn how companies navigate unprecedented backlogs and leverage new tech like AI for predictive logistics.

Ocean spot rates have surged more than 300% over the past five months, and shippers are feeling the squeeze, according to GEODIS President and CEO Laura Ritchie. Blank sailings, port congestion, and ongoing threats in the Red Sea and Strait of Hormuz have combined to create a backlog that is straining manufacturing supply chains, Ritchie told FreightWaves Today.

“We have product that we’ve been trying to book since March that’s still rolling in July,” Ritchie said. “And for people in the manufacturing space where they need these things on their assembly line, they’re not too happy.”

“We aren’t seeing quite the COVID levels, but a container is a lot more expensive than it was just a few months ago.”
— Laura Ritchie, President and CEO, GEODIS

Ritchie said air freight capacity exists as an alternative but comes at a cost shippers must be willing to absorb. She noted that big tech customers are navigating chip shortages and semiconductor import constraints simultaneously, compounding pressure on both ocean and air modes. GEODIS, which employs 20,000 workers across 230 U.S. sites, is staying close to customer forecasts to help manage the uncertainty.

Despite uneven demand across sectors, Ritchie pointed to pockets of strength. Some GEODIS customers are posting sales growth of 30% to 40%, while others are flat. Apparel is a bright spot, with unit volumes rising even on an inflation-adjusted basis, while housing improvements and new housing starts remain soft. The bifurcation, she said, largely depends on each customer’s end-market exposure.

On the technology front, Ritchie said GEODIS is deploying AI to manage shipment data and trucker oversight, and is using the tools to train and upskill warehouse associates who collectively speak more than 30 languages. The company is also piloting drones for inventory management inside warehouses, citing both accuracy and worker safety benefits over traditional cycle counting. Ritchie added that supply chain orchestration — using predictive data to autonomously respond to disruptions — will define the next two to three years for third-party logistics providers.

Ritchie, who completed her first year at GEODIS’s Nashville headquarters, said she created a client experience organization earlier in 2024 by consolidating previously fragmented functions: continuous improvement, data and analytics, and account management. She modeled the structure partly on changes made at American Airlines, which reorganized its customer journey after identifying internal silos that prioritized operational convenience over the passenger experience. The new group reports directly to Ritchie to ensure organizational neutrality.

Looking ahead, Ritchie said she is most encouraged by a broader shift in how shippers are approaching outsourcing decisions. “People are back to actually thinking about supply chain as partnerships instead of transactional,” she said, adding that shippers are more deliberately defining which core functions — product, marketing, manufacturing — they want to control and which they will entrust to a 3PL. GEODIS is owned by SNCF, the French national railroad, which Ritchie said provides financial stability and compliance infrastructure that has become increasingly valuable following the Supreme Court’s Bisected Freight ruling and tightened broker liability scrutiny.

  • Ocean spot rates have climbed more than 300% in five months, with cargo booked in March still rolling into July due to blank sailings and Red Sea disruptions.
  • GEODIS CEO Laura Ritchie consolidated continuous improvement, data analytics, and account management into a new client experience organization reporting directly to her.
  • GEODIS is piloting drones for warehouse inventory management and using AI to train associates across 30-plus languages as automation expands.

Speaker 1 [0:00] We have Laura Ritchie here from Nashville. She is the president and CEO of Geotis. She just completed her first year. Geotis is a massive company, 20,000 employees in the US, 230 sites. Laura, welcome to FreightWaves Today.

Speaker 2 [0:13] Thank you. Thanks, Craig. Thanks, Julie.

Speaker 1 [0:15] We’re so excited to have you. So tell us a little bit about, you know, this reconfiguration of the economy. ISM’s manufacturing data is incredibly robust. A lot of that is AI data centers and big infrastructure buildout. But what are you guys seeing right now?

Speaker 2 [0:29] You know, we’re scratching our head because we’re seeing all sorts of things. So we have customers who are doing really well, they’re seeing sales up double digits, 30, 40%. And then we have others who, you know, maybe aren’t seeing the same thing. And I think a lot of it depends on who their customers are. So we’re staying really close to those forecasts. We definitely see in big tech the challenges about the shortage of chips and the ability to get things over here. So we’re planning To help them manage that.

Speaker 1 [0:57] Now, is it hard to get airlift capacity? Is that tight right now due to just all of the semiconductors and memory chips that are coming over?

Speaker 2 [1:04] It is, although I would say what we’re still seeing is ocean continues to be a challenge as well. So with all the blank sailings that are happening, the port congestion, we’re seeing things actually get stuck more on the ocean side, and then air capacity’s there, you just have to be willing to pay for it.

Speaker 1 [1:21] It’s all, there’s a price for everything. The interesting thing on the ocean side is that ocean spot rates are up, you know, over 300% in just the last 5 months. What is it? Obviously, blank sailings are a big piece of that. The international ocean container lines have such market power. Is it just that they are just trying to control price or at least manage price? Is that really what’s happening?

Speaker 2 [1:42] I think there’s that, but I do think obviously with what’s happening in the Strait of Hormuz, that’s impacting it. Threats in the Red Sea are impacting it as well. So, you know, we saw the Port of India very congested, and it’s taken some while to clear that out. We just have a huge backlog now of goods. You know, we have product that we’ve been trying to book, you know, since March that’s still rolling in July. And for people in the manufacturing space where they need these things on their assembly line, they’re not too happy.

Speaker 1 [2:13] And that’s international shipping just doesn’t have capacity to provide it?

Speaker 2 [2:17] It is and/or it’s the spot market. spot rate you’re willing to pay, as you talked about, right? So we aren’t seeing quite the COVID levels, but, you know, a container is a lot more expensive than it was just, just a few months ago.

Speaker 1 [2:28] Well, the ocean container lines, no crisis averted, they always have, uh, take the opportunity to, to raise price. It does create a significant, um, issue and strain. One of the things that is coming through some of the survey data, you’re on the board of the Federal Reserve out of Nashville, the Atlanta Fed, uh, a lot of conversation about this sort of the have and have-nots economy. Housing is down significantly, or at least soft compared to where it has been. But then you get into these electronic components, into heavy, heavy manufacturing. We covered every week with just how strong the railroad volumes are. What are other parts of the economy that are doing well outside of this big electronic AI data center buildout?

Speaker 2 [3:09] I still think we’re seeing strength in retail, certain areas of retail. So apparel has actually been up even on an inflation basis. adjusted basis. We have customers that are telling us, you know, they were, they were making it on price, but they’re actually seeing more units start to move through. So I think if your brand is well positioned and you have value, you’re personalizing the customer experience, customers are staying. You know, some people say that they’re shopping, right, to kind of alleviate the sadness about the economy in general. And we’re definitely seeing some of that. They’re trading off on, you know, how often they fill up their gas tank to maybe have a splurge. We do see in housing improvements though, that is a little bit down. New housing starts are obviously down. So, so that’s something we see. But, but yeah, it’s very uneven and it makes it hard to predict across the board.

Speaker 3 [4:04] I will tell you that the number of packages arriving to my house each week, absolutely, if you graphed it in tandem with my stress level, like you could tell last week must have been tough because there’s a lot.

Speaker 1 [4:15] You guys must be really stressed out because we get a lot of those packages.

Speaker 2 [4:18] Statistical correlation there.

Speaker 3 [4:20] I think people are getting— Craig’s favorite topic— people are getting skinny, so they have to buy new clothes.

Speaker 1 [4:24] I’m glad you mentioned that. We’re a big fan of the GLP-1s here. It’s a big recurring topic. We, a couple of weeks ago, one of our guests is in a retail liquidation, particularly CPG as well as retail. And it was interesting because what she described is that apparel is doing exceptionally well as people downsize.

Speaker 2 [4:42] Yes.

Speaker 1 [4:43] But the foods products are actually, particularly the unhealthier food or foods that we all kind of love to splurge on, are not doing as well. And it was interesting to sort of see the fact that apparel, like as a GLP-1 user, I have gone through a number, that’s the worst part of this whole thing.

Speaker 3 [4:59] I said it’s the best part. First I was like— What, new clothes?

Speaker 1 [5:02] Yeah. Except when you get the bill. Like I, like it is, how many times, the problem is like—

Speaker 3 [5:09] You know how much worse it would be to have to keep buying new clothes because you were outgrowing them though?

Speaker 1 [5:12] Yeah, well, it’s true, but the problem is, as soon as I buy a jacket, it feels like a couple months later it’s too big as you continue to slim out.

Speaker 2 [5:20] So, well, but we all needed a clothing refresh, I feel like, after COVID, right? When you had the sweatpants on.

Speaker 1 [5:25] That’s true.

Speaker 2 [5:26] And you had to say, okay, is this stuff I was wearing in ’19 really worth it anymore?

Speaker 1 [5:29] It feels like at first people were still in the COVID casual mode.

Speaker 3 [5:33] Yes, yes.

Speaker 1 [5:34] And then over time, the more professional people come back to the office, just how different it is. So you’ve been in Nashville for a year.

Speaker 2 [5:40] Yes.

Speaker 1 [5:41] What exactly has that experience been like at GEODIS in terms of, this is a, you know, you’ve been at a number of different companies across the supply chain. What has specifically attracted you to GEODIS?

Speaker 2 [5:51] Well, I think, you know, one, when you say I’ve been in Nashville for a year, I’m like, I visit once in a while, but mostly I’ve been on the road, right? So, but when I looked at GEODIS, what I really liked is we have the international ownership. So we’re owned by SNCF, which is the French railroad. And that really gives us a stability, right? A financial stability, a solid base from which to grow, and then scale. So the ability to work with customers across all 3 regions, which is how we divide up the country, and then finally meeting the teammates. So I always insist that you do in-person interviews, even during COVID I did that when I changed roles, because I think it’s meeting people and saying, is this a place I wanna work? Do I think that, you know, I can add value here?

Speaker 1 [6:34] Mm-hmm.

Speaker 2 [6:35] and see myself as part of the team. And so, so it’s been a lot of fun. It’s, it’s a surprisingly vast, though, amount of warehouses, right? So 230 locations counting freight forwarding and warehousing. And so trying to tackle that has been a bit of a challenge. I’ve made a dent in a year, but certainly more to go.

Speaker 1 [6:52] The scale of it is quite— how do you, how do you prioritize in terms of your time, in terms of what you’re focusing on with so much scale? Is your goal to visit all the locations or the main offices, or how do you, how do you think about it?

Speaker 2 [7:05] Yeah, for me, it’s really understanding the business. And so what I kind of laid out is we have freight forwarding, we have the contract logistics and the transportation business. So what do I need to know? Do— is going to a freight forwarding office giving me the ability to learn the business? Sort of yes, sort of no, right? But I have the ability to do that more remote. The warehouses you really have to see because we have a scale of automation.

Speaker 1 [7:30] Mm-hmm.

Speaker 2 [7:30] And so seeing from the least automated to the most automated, And then our transportation hubs obviously operate sort of like warehouses, but also as transportation around, you know, cross-docking and things. So I wanted to make sure I could see and touch all of that. But my favorite thing to do is go and don’t do anything they’ve said, right? So don’t follow the tour path. Don’t talk to the associates that they’re pushing out in front. You know, certainly make nice, but to make sure you go the places where maybe somebody didn’t want you to go more because I just want to learn what’s happening. What are their challenges? I appreciate the, the nice red carpet that gets rolled out for the CEO, but how do you really get your, your fingers on the pulse?

Speaker 1 [8:12] Are we gonna see you on Undercover Boss?

Speaker 2 [8:14] Is that coming? Yeah, I did think of that because now they do start to know you after a year, so it’s a lot harder. You definitely would have to do more disguises.

Speaker 1 [8:22] I watched that show. Have you seen it, Julie?

Speaker 3 [8:24] Yeah. Yeah.

Speaker 1 [8:24] I watched the show and I’m like, how do these people not, it just, you have a camera crew maybe in the first couple of episodes, right? But it just feels like it is put on for TV. So I don’t know if it’s real or not.

Speaker 2 [8:34] I don’t know. I think that they’re telling— I mean, we film stuff in the warehouses all the time. We have customers doing things. So they, they, we, I think we could do that.

Speaker 1 [8:41] So you think it’s legit?

Speaker 2 [8:42] I think so.

Speaker 1 [8:42] Yeah. We, we need to get you on Undercover Boss so we can all root for— whenever there’s someone on for The Bachelor, my wife is a big reality TV connoisseur, we’ll say The Bachelorette or Bachelor that’s in freight, we’re always rooting for them.

Speaker 2 [8:55] Yes.

Speaker 1 [8:55] Yes. It’s like, this is one of us.

Speaker 2 [8:56] Yes, exactly.

Speaker 3 [8:57] So you’ve clearly done this tour. You have talked a lot about, like, listening being the most important part, seeing the parts of the business that might not be what is necessarily brought to you, the shiny parts of it. What surprised you most? What did you learn?

Speaker 2 [9:12] Really, the passion of our teammates. And I know probably everyone says that, but I went— my questions are always like, if I gave you a magic wand, what would you do differently? And all of their asks were, you know, we have a security system for one of our customers who requires it. And they’re like, could you put a bathroom in closer to us because it would be easier for all of us? And so they’re always so thoughtful about what’s meaningful for the teammate. You know, they could have said, pay me more. They could have said, you know, give me more perks or benefits. But, and even when I asked the people who came from another provider, why did you come here?

Speaker 3 [9:50] Yeah.

Speaker 2 [9:50] They’re like, because I heard it was a great place. I joke we have a fair amount of boomerangs, right? People who leave and think, oh, maybe I’ll try somewhere else. And then, you know, they come back a couple of years later, which was great because they get the experience outside. But really, Geotis is their home.

Speaker 1 [10:05] It is interesting. I think the days of, hey, this person’s left and we’re going to, you know, that’s sort of the old school transportation way. Get out and don’t come back. It is rewarding when someone comes back after they’ve had the chance to sort of realize that things aren’t as good. Yeah, because I think in business, you get so just, you get so frustrated. I always tell folks on our team is like, you’re going to get frustrated at times, and, and sometimes it’s better to see that it isn’t as great as you think it is going to be.

Speaker 2 [10:28] That’s right. I tell my kids that all the time, but that’s a tough lesson to learn. So, so I’m like, you should go learn it then. Don’t, don’t listen to just us. You experience it, see what something else is. You’ll learn, maybe you’ll bring things back. Plus, our industry is so small, so small. So, you know, people that you worked with 20 years ago come back again, and, you know, you need to make sure that you were a professional, so.

Speaker 1 [10:51] Yeah, for sure.

Speaker 2 [10:52] Yeah.

Speaker 3 [10:53] So, you talked about getting past sort of those surface-level issues, and I read that you use the 5 Whys to do that. Yes. Can you walk us through what those are, and then some outcomes of that? Sure.

Speaker 2 [11:03] So, it’s really the Toyota Production System, right? And what they were doing when they were diagnosing issues on the assembly line was saying, why is this happening? Why is this happening? And that’s really how you get to the root cause. So, a lot of it is, just continuing to ask why. Otherwise, we solve service issues. Right now, we’re launching several new clients. Of course, there’s always bumps and bruises when that happens. And it’s really saying like, oh, it’s easy to say, well, you know, we didn’t have this or we didn’t do this, but is that really the issue? Like, what’s really happening?

Speaker 3 [11:32] So getting to the root.

Speaker 2 [11:33] That’s right.

Speaker 3 [11:34] Not just the initial symptom.

Speaker 2 [11:36] That’s right.

Speaker 3 [11:37] But the actual cause. Yes.

Speaker 2 [11:39] And then actually fix it. Like, don’t do it again. One of the things I love about our business is we seem to like Groundhog Day. where you’ve done it and then you do it again and then you do it again. So I’m like, let’s learn from it, let’s carry that forward, let’s not repeat it.

Speaker 1 [11:52] It’s a great reference. I love that movie.

Speaker 2 [11:55] Yes.

Speaker 1 [11:56] It’s such a, it was one of my favorite movies to watch. I watched it a lot of times. You created a client experience organization earlier this year. What exactly does a client experience organization do?

Speaker 2 [12:06] Well, I was studying some other industries that were really focused on customer loyalty and developing the customer journey. which would be brands, airlines have done that, and said, our customer experience or our client experience is fragmented. So continuous improvement, which helps the customer get better, we get better with serving the customer. Our data and analytics team that does all of the analytics was fragmented. The actual account management team who manages the day-to-day was all separate. So what we’re trying to do is really pull that together and say, similar to how a brand would own the customer journey, That’s really what we’re focused on. So from the moment you say, maybe I wanna work with Geotis, then that’s part of the journey to say, and of course you’ll wanna stay.

Speaker 1 [12:50] So what were the businesses you looked at as inspiration? Any favorite sort of lessons from those that you took into Geotis?

Speaker 2 [12:57] So American Airlines is a great example of doing this where they had challenges. They were receiving ratings about their customer service. And as they studied it, what they realized is similarly their journey was fragmented, right? put it in what was natural to how the airline operated best instead of what was best for the customer. And I found that that’s kind of how we were thinking too, right? Like, let’s put data and analytics with IT because we’ll call that a tech thing.

Speaker 1 [13:25] Right.

Speaker 2 [13:25] You know, let’s put continuous improvement in the engineering team because that’s where engineers go versus saying, what is the customer experience with us, you know, throughout our journey together and how do we really point that? And then I had it report to me because I think that’s the difference. Sometimes we put it in operations, sometimes we put it in sales, and that makes it— makes the organization sort of become not neutral, right?

Speaker 1 [13:49] They have a bias to give you their own perspective.

Speaker 2 [13:52] That’s right.

Speaker 1 [13:52] The truth. And of course, AI has enabled— makes this data far more actionable. And, you know, we— I think one of the interesting things about AI is that you can build your processes around the technology versus I’m sorry, build the technology around your processes versus the other way around, which is quite unique. And I know you guys, I got to spend time with your team at Pallet, had a World Cup. I know you guys are huge soccer fans at Geotis. I got to spend time with some of your folks down in Miami, and I know you guys are doing some stuff with AI. What exactly are you implementing?

Speaker 2 [14:26] So we’re doing a couple different things. So we’re doing what you would see and expect most people are, right, which is taking all of these processes, all of the data, all of the shipment data, all of the management of truckers and things like that, and turning that into being more managed by AI, right? It’s process-heavy, so it lends itself to that. The other place that we’re really thinking about it though is in training and upskilling our teammates, particularly as we continue to go further into automation. It’s really helping to be able to train teammates I think we’re up to 30+ languages now that our teammates speak, and we just haven’t had the robustness to be able to interact with them in their own language and to be able to really lead the business forward. And then some other stuff I can’t talk about yet.

Speaker 1 [15:15] We track all the public earnings and conference calls. We have pods set to basically go out. Julie and I sort of manage this process where it goes out and listens to all the calls, the conference calls of the public companies, 72 public companies in supply chain logistics we track. The most bullish consistently is Prologis.

Speaker 2 [15:34] Yes.

Speaker 1 [15:34] What’s happening in the warehouse space is absolutely— I mean, they’re always ranked. We have Claude’s own ranking. It provides a ranking system based on a couple of metrics, but it’s consistently they’re the most bullish of all the public companies. What is special about warehousing right now? Why would they be enormously bullish?

Speaker 2 [15:53] Well, I think there’s a couple things, right? So we’re gonna have to bring up the data center word. So if you look at Prologis, they have a huge database, a huge land bank.

Speaker 3 [16:01] Mm-hmm.

Speaker 2 [16:01] So they have the ability, right, to really do warehousing and do data centers in a big way. But data centers is creating now a supply chain issue that we didn’t have before. So data centers are being built outside the normal supply chain structure. So even if you, talk about like building them, once they’re constructed, there are not a lot of warehouses nearby to do fast supply of repair parts. There’s not a lot of infrastructure to support the teammates that are going to work. So it’s actually creating a problem. You know, warehouses, people believe, have expanded outside of the city limits, but now the data centers are going farther. And so if they’re positioned to have both the warehousing and the data centers, I don’t wanna speak on behalf of Dan, but You know, that’s really, I think, why they continue to be bullish about that.

Speaker 1 [16:49] Yeah, it is interesting. That’s a great point. I hadn’t thought about the whole supply chain, the need. If you have this, you know, $100 million or even multi-billion dollar investment, you need to make sure it runs.

Speaker 3 [17:01] And it’s in the middle of nowhere in many cases.

Speaker 1 [17:03] It’s getting pushed out. I mean, so many municipalities and cities and even some states are banning data centers. And so you’re wanting to be out away from cities because zoning— I mean, even Hamilton County, which is a very conservative county here in Chattanooga, put a moratorium on all data centers.

Speaker 2 [17:24] Well, and then if you’re gonna— yeah, I agree. Sorry. And then if you’re gonna do nuclear to power them, which everyone’s talking about.

Speaker 1 [17:31] Tennessee is where all this action is happening. We keep telling people it’s great down here in the South. TVA is leading that.

Speaker 2 [17:38] They are.

Speaker 1 [17:39] TVA deserves a lot of credit.

Speaker 3 [17:40] Yes.

Speaker 1 [17:40] They have really built this entire region, helped win World War II. So yeah, the whole Oak Ridge, TVA, it was the reason we could produce so much aluminum.

Speaker 2 [17:50] Okay.

Speaker 1 [17:51] And the atomic bomb, so.

Speaker 2 [17:53] Just study my Tennessee history.

Speaker 1 [17:54] We’re big, I’m a big history fan.

Speaker 3 [17:56] Yeah, Craig’s a huge history fan. So speaking of technology and moving beyond AI, I’ve read that you’ve said that visibility is just not enough anymore. So tell me what you mean by that and what else is needed.

Speaker 2 [18:09] Well, I joke that we’ve been talking about supply chain visibility for as long as I have been working, and somehow we still don’t have it in an easy way. But I think the new buzzwords are orchestration, right? Like the ability to not only have the data, but actually be predictive, and not just predictive in the way of like, oh, this order is going to sell to this store, so I should put it close. but actually say, this is a disruption, here’s what I’m gonna do about it. So we’ve seen some early pilots around the ability to do that and do that without much human intervention. But, you know, you think about if there’s a physical flow and a data flow, and a lot of what 3PLs do is a data flow, what are we gonna do in 2 or 3 years when the data can be managed by AI, right? All the transactional data. It’s gonna be about how we orchestrate, how we actually get more predictive. I read something on LinkedIn over the weekend where somebody said delivery will actually be the product in the future. Like, what you’re buying won’t matter. It’ll be the actual delivery is all that matters. When you get it, how you get it, how fast. And of course, we call that the Amazon effect. But, but what does the future hold for that? I don’t think we know.

Speaker 1 [19:18] Are you guys doing anything with drones? Is that—

Speaker 2 [19:20] We are using them right now mostly for inventory. Inside the warehouse? Inside the warehouse and really kind of piloting that. It has some of the same challenges we saw with RFID around density and what type of product it has. But we’re sort of really focused on maybe that’s the way to manage inventory integrity in the future instead of our fund cycle counting.

Speaker 1 [19:42] Yeah, it’s got to be better in terms of just safety because the drone can get up. You know, the worst— some of the biggest challenges in a warehouse in terms of claims is just people climbing.

Speaker 2 [19:52] That’s right.

Speaker 1 [19:52] You know, on higher equipment and falling.

Speaker 2 [19:54] Yeah.

Speaker 1 [19:54] So it’s gotta be a much better way. What are you most bullish about? Like, what is, what is, of all the things that you guys are involved in, this massive scale, what is the technology or thing that you’re most bullish on?

Speaker 2 [20:03] Well, it’s gonna be slightly different than you think. What I’m most bullish is I think people are back to actually thinking about supply chain as partnerships instead of transactional. You know, we go through these cycles of insource, outsource, should I use a 3PL, should I not? And I feel like people are back to, let’s make some bets About what I want to do in my business. What do I want to control? Is it product? Is it marketing? Is it manufacturing? And then what am I going to use my 3PL for? And I think then we have to have the technology to be able to be an integrated part of our clients.

Speaker 1 [20:36] Are you seeing any movement since the Montgomery decision with the Supreme Court? Has there been any, you know, some of the stuff we’re hearing is that shippers realize that there’s risks associated with it and they want one degree of separation. they want a much more robust vetting process. Is that creating demand?

Speaker 2 [20:53] It is. And I think for us, we’ve had a pretty robust— obviously we have French government ownership. And so I feel like from a compliance perspective, we have that robustness. It’s taking capacity out, as you well know. So that’s kind of the biggest challenge. But we continue to double down on the compliance that we had.

Speaker 1 [21:12] Yeah, I think the question is, how long does this cycle last? Any perspective on it?

Speaker 2 [21:16] Yeah, but it was time. I feel like I don’t know whether it’s a cycle or it’s whether it’s Or is it just a natural resetting of supply and demand? I’m sort of hoping the latter.

Speaker 1 [21:25] I’m saying it’s the latter. That’s what we— I mean, I think the cycle is an easy term, but we’ve called it a supercycle because it feels like we’ve got a long run. I love that you guys are owned by a railroad, by the way. I’m a huge fan of the railroad. Julie gives me a hard time about it. We love the railroad.

Speaker 2 [21:38] Chattanooga choo choo.

Speaker 1 [21:38] Chattanooga choo choo. We love some trains down here. So Laura, really appreciate you coming in.

Speaker 2 [21:44] Thank you.

Speaker 1 [21:44] Thanks for joining us. I love Nashville. I love what you guys are doing. I love Geotis. The, the brand that you’ve built over— you guys have built is just— it’s, it’s really fascinating.

Speaker 2 [21:56] Thank you. That was great. Great to be here.

Speaker 3 [21:58] Great to see you. Great to see you.

Speaker 1 [21:59] I’m sure your home is Tennessee. We’re big fans.

Speaker 2 [22:01] Exactly. Me too.

Speaker 1 [22:02] So appreciate it.

July Manufacturing Data: Strong Numbers Signal Demand Boost

July’s PMI and ISM reports show incredible strength in manufacturing, with new orders up and customer inventories low. This data points directly to increased freight demand and a robust peak season ahead. Dive into the numbers and what they mean for the logistics industry.

July’s Purchasing Managers’ Index climbed to 55.6 — up 2.3% from June and the highest reading since May 2022 — while the ISM manufacturing index came in at 58.9, reinforcing signs of broad-based industrial expansion that could translate into stronger freight volumes through the remainder of the year, according to a FreightWaves SONAR update released Tuesday, August 4.

The figures matter to carriers, brokers, and shippers because they signal that manufacturers are running lean on inventory and will need to replenish — a dynamic that historically drives truckload and intermodal demand. Customer inventories in the ISM report registered 40.7, down 1.6% from the prior period, a level respondents characterized as too low.

Other ISM sub-indices reinforced the bullish read: production jumped to 58.5 in July, a 6.3% month-over-month increase, while backlogs rose 4.5% and manufacturing employment gained 3.1%. The PMI report also showed new orders increasing and manufacturing employment turning positive, set against a broader U.S. GDP growth backdrop of 2.8%.

“Orders are up. There is a need for replenishment in inventories. Backlogs are up. Everything is pointing to strength in these numbers and continued expansion in July, showing that we should be seeing some increased demand.”

On the labor side, 60% of ISM survey respondents said their companies are actively hiring, while the remainder said they are managing headcounts — a split that suggests manufacturers are cautiously optimistic rather than pulling back.

The SONAR analyst noted that capacity has not meaningfully re-entered the market, with tight supply stemming largely from regulatory pressure. That combination of rising demand signals and constrained capacity could accelerate rate movement if freight volumes follow manufacturing trends into the traditional fall peak. The analyst flagged the end of August as a potential inflection point to watch.

Separately, FreightWaves SONAR announced a new data partnership with Retlia to launch rtleg.usa, dubbed the Register, an index designed to give users a macroeconomic view of U.S. retail conditions. The index is now available in the SONAR platform.

  • July PMI rose to 55.6, up 2.3% from June and the strongest reading since May 2022, while ISM came in at 58.9.
  • ISM customer inventories fell to 40.7, down 1.6%, signaling a restocking cycle that could lift freight demand through peak season.
  • SONAR launched a new retail macroeconomic index, rtleg.usa, developed in partnership with Retlia.

Speaker 1 [0:07] Today’s sonar update. I’m going to focus on two things. Today is Tuesday, August fourth. One, an exciting new sonar development. We have partnered with Retlia to produce a new index, rtleg.usa. It’s called the Register, and it gives a view of macroeconomic. Retail conditions. So very cool. Check it out in the Sonar UI. The second thing I really want to focus on and talk about is the new PMI numbers and ISM numbers that were released yesterday for July. So the PMI for July is 55.6, which is up 2.3% above June and a record since May 2022. Overall, For the PMI, new orders increased, inventories remained too low based on sentiment, manufacturing employment turned positive. And all of this is really signaling economic growth on the backdrop of GDP growth at 2.8%. The ISM number came in at 58.9, customer inventories at 40.7, which is down 1.6%, showing they’re going to need to replenish and restock those inventories. Overall employment was up 3.1% in manufacturing. Production increased to 58.5 in July, which is 6.3% up. Backlogs are up by 4.5%. And of those surveyed, 60% said that their companies are hiring, while the remainder said they are managing headcounts. But overall, Orders are up. There is a need for replenishment in inventories. Backlogs are up. Everything is pointing to strength in these numbers and continued expansion in July, showing that we should be seeing some increased demand. You know, we’re not seeing capacity enter the market. This market has been really driven based on lack of capacity due to regulatory pressure. And this is signaling continued strength in manufacturing in our industrial economy. Which should continue to generate freight. Obviously, commodities coming in, finished goods going out, heading to DCs, and then eventually to retailers or to the consumer or the ultimate purchaser. So all of that should be generating freight and looking towards continued strengthening that we have been talking about and potential increased demand coming in the end of August and then through a normal peak season in the fall. So we’ll continue to watch it. But overall, all of the PMI and ISM numbers really came in incredibly strong. So excited to keep watching that. There’s a great article in FreightWaves on FreightWaves website that was released today, really detailing the outcome of this month’s report. So I encourage you to check it out.

Speaker 2 [3:01] All right. So a reminder that the Sonar update today is brought to you by RXO CapacityNow. So as we Hopefully see that continued increase in freight demand as we go through the rest of the year and into peak season. If your routing guide breaks down, if you need capacity now, be sure to reach out to RXO.

Old Trailers, New Purpose: Warehouse on Wheels Reinvents Storage | FreightWaves

John Brooks, CEO of Warehouse on Wheels, shares how his company is revolutionizing industrial storage by repurposing end-of-life over-the-road trailers. Discover their rapid growth, cost-effective solutions, and how they provide critical flexibility in today’s unpredictable supply chain. Learn about their unique business model and the newly released Supply Chain Activity Index. #SupplyChainInnovation #LogisticsSolutions

Warehouse on Wheels CEO John Brooks wants to double his company’s footprint to 100 locations and 100,000 trailers, he told FreightWaves, building on a run that has taken the Houston-area firm from 2 locations and roughly 4,000 trailers when it launched in November 2017 to 37 locations and 35,000 trailers today, serving 6,000 customers across a network that now stretches from Montreal to Monterrey, Mexico.

The company’s model is straightforward: acquire end-of-life over-the-road trailers, repaint them, certify them federally, and rent them to manufacturers, retailers, and distributors as flexible storage at rates Brooks says run 2 to 4 times cheaper per square foot than traditional warehouse space. Contracts are 30-day evergreen agreements — not the five-, seven-, or 10-year leases typical of industrial real estate — a structure Brooks said is a key competitive advantage. The company targets an 8x return on invested capital over the life of each trailer.

“When we win a heart and mind, we rarely lose it. And so a customer may have 50 trailers, they may size down to 25 or up to 100, but they never really give up that solution once they’ve had a chance to experience what we offer,” Brooks said.

Warehouse on Wheels is preparing to open a Chicago location within two weeks, a market Brooks described as central to the company’s strategy of positioning assets along the eight major U.S. transportation corridors and in smaller towns adjacent to those routes. The company is backed by private equity sponsor Windpoint Partners, which came on board in 2021 after an initial partnership with Milton Street Capital.

Alongside its expansion, the company recently released a Supply Chain Activity Index designed to measure the flow of goods through the supply chain rather than serve as another pricing benchmark. The index draws on a basket of widely tracked indicators combined with on- and off-ramp activity across Warehouse on Wheels’ own trailer fleet. Scored on a 0-to-100 scale with 50 as neutral, the index registered 42.2 in June, indicating contraction. Brooks said he expects the July reading to improve but cautioned that conditions outside of AI-related infrastructure spending remain subdued.

“There is still a general malaise, in our opinion,” Brooks said, describing a “wait-but-still-move mindset” among supply chain operators who need to show quarterly growth to shareholders but are not making large inventory bets. He drew a contrast with 2018, when the first round of tariffs triggered a significant build-ahead in inventories, saying this cycle has instead produced smaller, more cautious purchasing decisions.

Operationally, Brooks said neither land nor used trailers represent a significant constraint on growth. The company typically needs only 3 to 5 acres of gravel per location, and the post-COVID used trailer market has produced ample supply from private carriers deflating and modernizing their fleets. Average rental periods currently run around 20 to 24 months. The company’s “55 and 55” standard — trailers must look presentable from 55 feet away at 55 miles per hour — governs how each acquired unit is refurbished before going to work for a customer.

  • Warehouse on Wheels grew from 2 locations and 4,000 trailers in 2017 to 37 locations and 35,000 trailers today, with a goal of 100 locations and 100,000 trailers.
  • The company’s Supply Chain Activity Index scored 42.2 in June, below the neutral level of 50, with Brooks citing a ‘general malaise’ in the goods economy outside AI infrastructure spending.
  • End-of-life trailers yield an 8x return on invested capital over their useful life, renting at 2 to 4 times less per square foot than traditional warehouse space on 30-day evergreen contracts.

Speaker 1 [0:00] We’re gonna talk about trailers. We like to call them warehouse on wheels, and nobody, nobody more than to call them warehouse on wheels named his company after it. John Brooks is the CEO of the company Warehouse on Wheels. Welcome, John. How are you today, sir?

Speaker 2 [0:14] I’m very good. Thank you all for having me. I appreciate it.

Speaker 1 [0:17] All right, so Warehouse on Wheels is trailers. Tell us a little bit about the business.

Speaker 2 [0:22] Yeah, so in 2017, I started the business with our first 2 locations and about 4,000 trailers. And today we’re at 37 locations and 35,000 trailers. We’ve built the business through a multitude of networks from now Montreal, Canada to Monterrey, Mexico. And our purpose is we take end-of-life over-the-road trailers and we repurpose them for flexible industrial storage into the supply chains of our 6,000 customers.

Speaker 1 [0:50] So the idea here is that these trailers that have are no longer, they may be roadworthy, but they’re no longer really in the best of shape to be roadworthy. You’re using them for storage. What’s the advantage of that over a traditional warehouse?

Speaker 2 [1:06] Yeah, so from an economic standpoint, we’re generally 2 to 4 times less expensive on a per square footage basis, and we only require a 30-day evergreen contract, so not a 5, 7, 10-year lease. So the unit economics clearly lean in our favor. And to your point, yes, the trailers are roadworthy. We take those trailers in, we give them a fresh coat of paint, a fresh Federal, so they’re safe, dark, and dry and ready to go to work.

Speaker 1 [1:31] What is the advantage? So cost advantages, but in other commodities, is there any commodities that work better for these trailers or is it all price?

Speaker 2 [1:41] You know, I think it’s a matter of just solving that short-term pain point in the supply chain. You know, You know, we’re all just one tweet away from our silent partners in Washington or some other disruption in the supply chain. And when that happens, that’s really when our assets show up and serve best, is solving that short-term need, that pressure relief valve, that easy button for the guys and gals on the dock that are dealing with issues every day.

Speaker 3 [2:05] Yeah, I think it makes a ton of sense. The flexibility there has to be incredibly beneficial. So you recently released a Supply Chain Activity Index. So can you tell us what it actually measures, what it does, and what prompted you all to come up with the index?

Speaker 2 [2:23] Yeah, we felt like we needed to share with the world kind of our view of the supply chain and how well or how things are performing, I guess. With 6,000 customers across a multitude of industries from automotive manufacturer to retail, we thought we had a view. And so our index is really designed to highlight the level of goods activity throughout the supply chain. It’s, it’s not another pricing index. And so what we did is we, we took a basket of measures that everybody already respects. I just saw it on the Sonar update. I’m looking forward to our July refresh because I think it’ll even be more positive. And then we compared that to the on-off-ramp activity within our own business, and we think that it forms a view of how the underlying supply chain activity and goods are moving.

Speaker 3 [3:09] So it runs 0 to 100, if I’m correct. 50 is neutral. June was— where was June? Oh, 42.2. I see it in the graphic. It’s hard to see. You said you’re looking forward to—

Speaker 1 [3:25] The lines are real small.

Speaker 3 [3:26] Yeah. Well, it says 42.2 very large. I know. It’s up there, but it is—

Speaker 1 [3:30] not just your eyes. Mine too.

Speaker 3 [3:32] I got new contacts yesterday. They might be worse. Anyway. So tell us, so we’re below neutral. So what does that mean for the supply chain overall? What are you expecting for July?

Speaker 2 [3:41] Well, I think it really lines up with even the headline that was in the Journal this morning about how our economy is almost becoming over-indexed to the AI-related infrastructure build. And so when you look through to the goods economy and think about housing starts and other just durable goods orders outside of the AI infrastructure build, there is still a general malaise, in our opinion. There’s a— I sometimes call it this wait-but-still-move mindset that people need to grow, they need to perform quarter over quarter for their shareholders, but no one’s making any real big bets. It’s a lot like the information you guys just shared from Sonar about inventory levels. They’re below ideal. And so, yes, I believe there will be a restocking as we build towards hopefully a more traditional peak season, but at this point, outside of those AI-related builds and components, there’s a general malaise out there.

Speaker 3 [4:34] So I want to continue to tie this together. Trailers being rented or then being, I guess, sent back to you, whatever the right words are for that, across your 37 locations. So why is that a clean read on freight flow as a whole versus just sort of inventory levels?

Speaker 2 [4:54] It’s definitely indexed to inventory levels for sure. But I think it also represents the lack of front-end flow. The fact that when you think about 2018, for example, the first time we dealt with this sort of tariff approach to things, there was a real focus and a real build-ahead, if you will, on inventories. Whereas this time, as the administration came back in and started implementing these things, I think people took a bit of a wait-and-see attitude. They would take smaller bites at the apple, but it wasn’t the big wave of goods. So in our minds, it’s an indicator of the totality of the activity within the supply chain from raw materials to ultimately getting it on the shelves.

Speaker 3 [5:38] So with it being sort of a relatively low number right now, still in contraction below 50%, I think it’s really interesting and I want your take on, despite that, you guys have had tremendous growth to 37 locations now and 38,000, 36,000 trailers I read. So how do you reconcile those 2 things?

Speaker 2 [5:58] Well, we’ve been consolidating the space first and foremost. I was a customer back in the day and saw an opportunity that I felt like this was a portion of the trailer’s life that was a bit neglected. There were a lot of small mom-and-pop players out there serving this use case of storage and local cartage, and we went upon the mission of building a bigger version of that. a national footprint, or in this case, even now an international footprint. So that’s really been the driver behind the growth. And then quite honestly, as we build brand and solution awareness and people come to understand the true economics of the solution, when we win a heart and mind, we rarely lose it. And so a customer may have 50 trailers, they may size down to 25 or up to 100, but they never really give up that solution once they’ve had a chance to experience what we offer.

Speaker 1 [6:48] John, what is the— you got shoes framed in the background. What is special about those shoes? They look like Air Jordans. Am I reading that right?

Speaker 2 [6:55] They are. Much to my wife’s chagrin, I have a Jordan problem.

Speaker 1 [7:00] Okay.

Speaker 2 [7:01] And I’m pretty sure it’s ’cause I couldn’t afford ’em as a kid, but those are actually custom Warehouse— oh, the wrong way— custom Warehouse on Wheels Jordans. And I couldn’t bring myself to wear ’em and scuff ’em up, so they’re a great conversation piece with my management book there from Michael Scott as well, ’cause I’m a big Office fan.

Speaker 1 [7:17] And you’ve got a bunch of, it looks like trucks in the background too, a nice toy collection.

Speaker 2 [7:21] So each time we buy a brand, we have kept that regional brand. And so that’s the family of brands under Warehouse On Wheels. So our customers know us as Meisler Trailer Rental, First In Trailer Service, Advantage Trailer Rental. So Warehouse On Wheels really represents at this point the holding company of that family of brands.

Speaker 1 [7:39] That’s kind of fun. You do a deal, a transaction, and you get a new toy. There you go. I think that’s every man’s dream is like deal, business, let’s make some money. Well, it’s better than a diltoy. You know, those that don’t know what a diltoy is, like a plaque. This is actually even cooler.

Speaker 2 [7:54] A tombstone, yeah. I’ve got enough of those too from my 7 tours with different private equity firms, but yeah, I like the trucks better.

Speaker 1 [8:00] Now, are you guys private equity backed, or did you found it and funded it yourself?

Speaker 2 [8:05] So we’re private equity backed. We’re on our second sponsor. So myself and a group called Milton Street Capital outta Houston started building the business together, and then in 2021, we joined forces with Windpoint Partners, our current sponsor.

Speaker 1 [8:19] Is it harder to find the land? Is that the big issue, or is it the trailers themselves that are the sort of growth constraint?

Speaker 2 [8:25] To be honest with you, neither are that hard because when we go to a market, we generally only need 3 to 5 acres of gravel. It’s pretty simple. And then the used trailer market, now that we’ve come off the COVID abnormalities, there’s a plethora of used trailers in the market. And so that’s really our sources. We’re buying from the private carriers as they defleet and then modernize their fleets.

Speaker 1 [8:48] And would you, in terms of picking a new location, other than, I know you’re buying existing locations, are you scouting out new locations that you guys will open?

Speaker 2 [8:56] Yeah, we just launched. We’ll launch in the next 2 weeks in Chicago, of all places. We’re kind of slow to get there, but really, you think about us along the 8 major corridors of transportation, and then probably in smaller towns just adjacent to those main thoroughfares. That’s really where we thrive.

Speaker 1 [9:13] John, you’re a brave man to put an industrial asset in Chicago, but it is the epicenter of freight, not as big and important as Chattanooga is, but it is certainly up there. Right, totally agree. In terms of growth, what is the constraint on growth? Is it capital? Is it customer demand? What slows you guys down?

Speaker 2 [9:39] Yeah, I mean, I think we’ve got to be good stewards of the capital. Again, we’re private equity owned, so there’s not an infinite checkbook, but I think for us, there’s really been little to no constraints. I mean, to go from 2 locations in roughly essentially 2018, we started in November of ’17, to 37 today, I think is a real testament to what the model can be. And my vision for the organization is 100 locations and 100,000 trailers, and that’s what we’re building towards.

Speaker 1 [10:06] Wow. And then do you have any metrics you can share with us in terms of what a trailer does in terms of monthly yield or annual yield?

Speaker 2 [10:13] Yeah, absolutely. So, you know, the way we do things and operate, you know, we’re generally providing kind of an 8x money-on-invested-capital return on these trailers. So we’ve really built quite a mousetrap that I’m pretty proud of and something that we’re continuing to scale.

Speaker 1 [10:31] So 8x, is that over the life of that trailer? Yes, over the life of the trailer. So when you’re looking for, When you’re buying an asset, you’re looking for it to basically yield 8 times what you guys invested.

Speaker 2 [10:42] Absolutely. And if you think about it, our use case is so much different than the over-the-road. The trailer rolls to the site, it gets loaded, it’s generally stored close to the site, or maybe comes back to our yard to be stored. So it really minimizes the wear and tear on the asset, which allows that asset then to have a substantial useful life under our ownership.

Speaker 3 [11:01] But John, does it make so much sense? Because at that point in the life of the asset is when the maintenance costs begin to rise, right?

Speaker 2 [11:07] Yeah.

Speaker 3 [11:07] But you’re not gonna have to do nearly as much.

Speaker 1 [11:09] It’s a great business model.

Speaker 3 [11:10] I’m really into it. Yeah, as long as they are watertight.

Speaker 1 [11:12] Well, that’s the thing I was wondering.

Speaker 3 [11:15] And he mentioned that.

Speaker 2 [11:16] Safe, dark, and dry is what we like to say.

Speaker 3 [11:18] Say it again. What? Dark and dry?

Speaker 2 [11:20] Safe, dark, and dry.

Speaker 3 [11:22] Safe, dark, and dry.

Speaker 1 [11:22] So I am just curious, is there certain commodities that this isn’t ideal for? Obviously, a fridge isn’t.

Speaker 2 [11:29] Yeah, anything temperature controlled really doesn’t fit for us, but Again, we’re supporting everyone from automotive manufacturers through apparel production through to retail. Plastics manufacturers are a big customer as well because, again, in that business, a lot of times it’s optimizing the raw material input, so playing the commodities market, and then optimizing the throughput volume so you don’t have to change over tools and so forth. That trailer flexibility to allow you to store that staged or even finished product Gives you a tremendous lever to play as you manage those other key components of your process.

Speaker 3 [12:04] I don’t even think through the course of them, even through the course of a month, it would be like, you know, end of month, end of quarter, getting it off your yard and into one of these trailers wherever it needs to go. Like, I would think the flexibility has got to be the biggest selling part.

Speaker 1 [12:17] Brilliant. John, I imagine permitting is so much easier than building a physical building, particularly in certain districts where they don’t, you know, they’re not welcoming industrial real estate. You have the advantage of, you know, you have portable units and they’re classified as trailers. I imagine that gives you an enormous amount of advantage in permitting.

Speaker 2 [12:35] It absolutely helps. We’re actually, we’ve got our Ecovadis score, so we’re recognized as an environmentally friendly solution because not only are we helping you avoid the construction of the warehouse and the infrastructure and all the burden that goes with that, we’re also helping to keep some of these trailers out of the scrapyard, relatively speaking. And so Again, viewed very positively from an ESG standpoint. I like to say that we make the procurement guys happy, we make the CFO happy, and we darn sure make the operators happy.

Speaker 1 [13:03] One man’s junk is another man’s treasure. That is the great thing here is these old units. I have to imagine, John, if we went to one of your yards, we would see some old school trucking names out there. Like, you know, we used to own a company called Paragon Leasing, which is a trailer leasing company. Occasionally, Julie, around town you’ll see a Southwest Motor Freight trailer that’s out there. It always makes me happy. Usually it’s been stripped.

Speaker 3 [13:28] Yeah, and you could just still see like the— Yeah, the ghost.

Speaker 1 [13:32] Yeah, the ghost of the freight.

Speaker 2 [13:33] Well, I have a rule.

Speaker 3 [13:34] It’s—

Speaker 2 [13:35] I have all these Brooksisms, as you guys will get to know me, and one of them is 55 and 55. I want the trailer to look good at 55 feet away and 55 miles an hour. So we give it a fresh coat of paint all the way around, a fresh branding, and then a fresh federal. So again, back to my earlier point, it shows up safe, dark, and dry, ready to go to work, and it needs to look good from that distance.

Speaker 1 [13:55] So those ghosts of trailers past, those libraries that are gone on to— are, are no longer there?

Speaker 2 [14:01] Our intention is to cover those up. Now, will one slip through the cracks? And, and with all our acquisitions, quite honestly, there are some trailers we’ve probably acquired that I haven’t even seen yet in our hold period because they stay on rent that long. Our, our average rental period right now is probably about 20, 24 months. So, wow.

Speaker 3 [14:17] And can those shippers transfer those between different facilities of theirs, or is it for a specific location?

Speaker 2 [14:24] They’re licensed and federally certified, so they can roll on the road, and we’ll help move them for them if they need us to.

Speaker 1 [14:30] Amazing business. I love businesses that just require creativity, brilliance, leverage capital, recycling. John’s got an amazing business. We’re big fans of yours, John, here. I am.

Speaker 2 [14:44] Well, I am fans of yours as well. What you guys have built here and the service you provide to those of us in the space, I honestly am sincerely grateful for that.

Speaker 1 [14:52] Well, likewise. Well, if you get ahold of an old Roadway trailer, just give us a holler. I’m looking for one. I think those are cool. I’ll send you pictures. I want the OG one, not the YRC one. I want the old school Roadway. And it’s really its prime right before the big acquisition. John, thank you so much for coming on Freightways Today. We’ll have to have you back.

Speaker 2 [15:13] Thank you all very much.

Speaker 1 [15:14] Have a good day.