British Columbia tanker ban stays afloat in Canada’s Senate

But critics, particularly those in Western Canada, have called it as an ineffective measure that would harm an already beleaguered oil industry by limiting potential exports.

Fears of ‘landlocking prairie oil’

The chair of the Transportation Committee, Conservative Sen. David Tkachuk of Saskatchewan, earlier in the week said that in absence of an expansion of the Transmountain Pipeline, “Bill C-48 tells Albertans in particular that they may never be able to get their largest export to Pacific markets.”

“By landlocking prairie oil, both symbolically and practically, Bill C-48 tells these provinces that they have a lesser place in the Confederation, that it is not an equal partner within Canada,” he added.

Sen. Julie Miville-Dechêne, the only independent on the transport committee who supported C-48, said the recommendation showed “cruel insensitivity” to indigenous people who live on British Columbia’s coast, and would be impacted by a potential spill.

She noted that the bill had unfairly become “the symbol of everything that’s going badly in the industry and everything Albertans are going through.”

Separately, the full Senate approved C-69, a bill to overhaul how Canada assesses energy projects.

Oil industry executives have criticized the bill, saying it would restrict new projects. The version passed by the Senate would take away power from the minister of the environment to intervene during assessments.