Maersk warns US against unilateral shipping rules

FMC should work toward bolstering existing enforcement regimes, company asserts

Maersk Evora at the Port of Los Angeles. (Photo: Port of L.A.)

WASHINGTON — A unilateral strategy to prevent foreign ship owners and operators from undercutting America’s trade interests could backfire if US regulators decide to take that approach, shipping giant Maersk warns.

In comments filed in response to the Federal Maritime Commission’s flag registry investigation, Maersk (MAERSKb.CO) recognized the need to crack down on flag states with weak regulations and enforcement measures that can be exploited by vessel owners and operators to undermine fair competition.

But FMC’s effort to raise standards for so-called flags of convenience – registries with relatively little regulatory oversight – could be potentially harmful for the industry, according to Maersk, if the agency were to create its own enforcement regime, such as a national list of “approved” or “unapproved” flag registries.

“International shipping is inherently a cross-border global industry, and only international rules can secure a level playing field,” the company told the agency.

“A situation whereby countries or regional entities start to develop their own lists of approved or banned flags would in our opinion lead to potential situations where certain regions may weaponize national flag lists, also against U.S. interests. This would inevitably lead to more inefficient and more costly global trade patterns.”

Maersk acknowledged that some flag states lack the ability or political will to rigorously enforce standards. It pointed out, however, that existing oversight by the International Maritime Organisation and other international agreements provide a framework for improvement.

“Only by reinforcing the existing international regime can we maintain a level competitive playing field while safeguarding the safety of seafarers, the environment, and the integrity of global trade.”

Global Financial Integrity (GFI), a Washington, DC-based research group specializing in trade-based financial crime, believes the FMC should take the opposite approach. It recommends that the agency establish its own regulations to address the issue.

“GFI believes that [FMC] efforts to influence responsible flagging laws outside the United States will be ineffective,” wrote GFI President and CEO Tom Cardamone, in comments to the agency. “Rather, the United States should take measures … to inoculate against harmful practices most associated with [flags of convenience] ships.”

To support that strategy, Cardamone cited research GFI conducted in 2022 on seizures made by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) of goods taken from foreign vessels. Between 2018 and 2021, in instances where CBP publicly disclosed the name of the ship, more than half of the cases revealed that the ship was flying a flag of convenience, GFI’s research found.

“Given that about 30 percent of commercial vessels globally fly flags of convenience, we see the higher incidence of [flag of convenience] ships related to CBP seizures as significant,” Cardamone stated.

Based on this data and reports linking flag of convenience ships with a higher likelihood of operating unsafe and non-compliant vessels, GFI recommended, among other things, that FMC, CBP, and the U.S. Coast Guard deem ships flying flags of convenience as “having an inherent increased risk to the United States,” and that the FMC implement regulations that require mandatory safety inspections for all such ships.

Click for more FreightWaves articles by John Gallagher.

Upcoming FreightWaves Events
Fraud & Security

Freight Fraud Symposium

Double brokering. AI deepfakes. Identity theft. Freight fraud is an existential threat to the industry. Get ahead of it.

May 20, 2026
Rock & Roll Hall of Fame • Cleveland, OH
Register Now
AI & Technology

Supply Chain AI Symposium

Past the hype. Join operators, founders, and enterprise leaders figuring out how to deploy AI in supply chain.

July 15, 2026
The Old Post Office • Chicago, IL
Register Now
Rail & Policy

Future of Rail Symposium

Reshoring is rewriting freight demand. Join shippers, rail executives, and government officials to shape the next decade.

July 28, 2026
The Signal at Chattanooga Choo Choo • Chattanooga, TN
Register Now
Fraud & Security Freight Fraud Symposium May 20 • Cleveland, OH

Double brokering. AI deepfakes. Identity theft. Freight fraud is an existential threat to the industry. Get ahead of it.

Rock & Roll Hall of Fame • Cleveland, OH Register Now
AI & Technology Supply Chain AI Symposium Jul 15 • Chicago, IL

Past the hype. Join operators, founders, and enterprise leaders figuring out how to deploy AI in supply chain.

The Old Post Office • Chicago, IL Register Now
Rail & Policy Future of Rail Symposium Jul 28 • Chattanooga, TN

Reshoring is rewriting freight demand. Join shippers, rail executives, and government officials to shape the next decade.

The Signal at Chattanooga Choo Choo • Chattanooga, TN Register Now

John Gallagher

Based in Washington, D.C., John specializes in regulation and legislation affecting all sectors of freight transportation. He has covered rail, trucking and maritime issues since 1993 for a variety of publications based in the U.S. and the U.K. John began business reporting in 1993 at Broadcasting & Cable Magazine. He graduated from Florida State University majoring in English and business.