FedEx, UPS, Oakley face lawsuits over Trump tariff refunds

Promise to repay customers doesn’t go far enough FedEx complaint says

Several trailers wait to be loaded at a FedEx Logistics terminal in California. A new lawsuit demands that FedEx refund all duties the company collected from customers after the Supreme Court ruled the U.S. government used authority it didn’t have to impose tariffs. (Photo: Shutterstock/JHVEPhoto)

FedEx Corp., United Parcel Service and the maker of Ray-Ban and Oakley sunglasses face proposed class action lawsuits that seek to recover payments for import duties and fees associated with the Trump administration’s emergency tariffs that were invalidated by the U.S. Supreme Court last week. 

On Friday, injury law firm Morgan and Morgan filed suit against FedEx Logistics (NYSE: FDX) in U.S. District Court for Southern Florida seeking a full refund of duties paid by an individual in Miami and seeking to represent millions of other consumers similarly impacted the tariffs and fees passed on by FedEx after paying the government. The plaintiff, Matthew Reiser, paid $36 in duty and fees on a pair of tennis shoes he bought from Tennis Warehouse Europe, a German company, on Jan. 27. 

“FedEx is the only entity with legal standing to seek a refund of duties directly from the government. This leaves consumers like our client with no choice but to try to legally compel FedEx to refund them for the tariffs that they were charged by FedEx, not to mention the ancillary fees FedEx added to process these transactions,” said Morgan & Morgan founder John Morgan and attorney John Yanchunis, in a statement. “Our goal is to return to American consumers every penny they were improperly charged.”

New Yorker Nathan Ward on Thursday filed a proposed class action lawsuit against EssilorLuxottica S.A., the multinational maker of Ray-Ban, Oakley and Costa sunglasses. The company has sued the U.S. government for a refund and should return any reimbursements received to customers it charged, the suit says, noting that tariff surcharges increased the price of Ward’s purchase by about 6% compared to prices in the spring of 2025.

Previously, Hali Anastopoulo, a freight forwarder and customs broker in South Carolina, filed multiple lawsuits against FedEx and UPS (NYSE: UPS) in federal district courts in South Carolina, Georgia and Tennessee for repayment of duties, interest and related costs paid for parcel imports. The complaints, filed by the firm of Poulin Wiley, ask the courts to grant nationwide class-action status for all people who paid UPS for tariffs declared under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Anastopoulo is represented in the Tennessee case by Stranch Jennings & Garvey.

FedEx and UPS complaints are tied to the elimination last year of a duty exemption enjoyed by importers of low-value goods, typically shipped directly to consumers through parcel and postal channels. The end of the exemption subjected merchandise to high tariffs being imposed on countries around the world. 

The Supreme Court ruled that IEEPA doesn’t authorize the President to impose broad-based tariffs. Trump used the rationale that imports of the dangerous drug fentanyl and the overall U.S. trade deficit were national emergencies that required immediate executive action. Customs brokers like FedEx and UPS passed the costs of tariffs onto their customers, along with brokerage and clearance fees. 

The Court was mum on what should happen to more than $130 billion in duties, plus interest, already collected. Legal scholars and trade professionals say it is unclear if the government will agree to return money to companies. It could be some time before the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Customs and Border Protection roll out a process for issuing refunds on IEEPA tariff duties and determine who is eligible, trade compliance experts say.

On Monday, FedEx sued the U.S. government seeking a full refund of duties paid under the IEEPA order. The company publicly stated it plans to return any refunds it receives to customers and consumers who originally bore the charges, but the Morgan and Morgan lawsuit notes that the company didn’t make any legally binding promise in its complaint, nor has it mentioned any plan to refund the extra processing fees it charged. 

Click here for more FreightWaves/American Shipper stories by Eric Kulisch.

Write to Eric Kulisch at ekulisch@freightwaves.com.

Customer sues FedEx for refund after Supreme Court rejects Trump tariffs

FedEx redeploys air fleet after US ends parcel tariff exemption

Eric Kulisch

Eric is the Parcel and Air Cargo Editor at FreightWaves. An award-winning business journalist with extensive experience covering the logistics sector, Eric spent nearly two years as the Washington, D.C., correspondent for Automotive News, where he focused on regulatory and policy issues surrounding autonomous vehicles, mobility, fuel economy and safety. He has won two regional Gold Medals and a Silver Medal from the American Society of Business Publication Editors for government and trade coverage, and news analysis. He was voted best for feature writing and commentary in the Trade/Newsletter category by the D.C. Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists. He was runner up for News Journalist and Supply Chain Journalist of the Year in the Seahorse Freight Association's 2024 journalism award competition. In December 2022, Eric was voted runner up for Air Cargo Journalist. He won the group's Environmental Journalist of the Year award in 2014 and was the 2013 Supply Chain Journalist of the Year. As associate editor at American Shipper Magazine for more than a decade, he wrote about trade, freight transportation and supply chains. He has appeared on Marketplace, ABC News and National Public Radio to talk about logistics issues in the news. Eric is based in Vancouver, Washington. He can be reached for comments and tips at ekulisch@freightwaves.com