Watch Now


FMC considering 60-day congestion emergency order

Container terminals would be required to share cargo availability data with shippers, railroads, trucks

Stacked containers at the Port of Los Angeles. (Photo: Jim Allen/FreightWaves)

The Federal Maritime Commission will ask the public to comment on whether supply chain congestion is severe enough to order carriers and container terminals to share their cargo availability data directly with shippers, railroads and drayage truckers.

Information received in response “will help inform the commission’s decision on whether an emergency situation exists and whether to issue an emergency order to address any such situation,” the FMC stated in a document released Thursday.

Issuance of a congestion emergency order, which would last up to 60 days with the option to extend it, was authorized by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022 (OSRA), signed into law in June, pending a review of comments from the container trades.

The FMC noted in its information request that the container shipping sector has tried various strategies to reduce chronic bottlenecks over the past two years, including diverting vessel services from the most congested ports.


“This shift, however, has often resulted in increased congestion at previously non- or less-congested U.S. port areas or regions,” the FMC stated in its comment request. “Total U.S. port congestion, measured by the number of containers on ships waiting to berth, average ship waiting time at key U.S. ports and container dwell time have all decreased in recent months. Relevant metrics, however, remain higher than pre-pandemic levels.”

But the order could turn out to be necessary based on evidence of increasing congestion ahead of the fall peak shipping season.

Last week FMC Chairman Dan Maffei warned marine terminals and ocean carriers at the Port of New York and New Jersey that they may be responsible for paying shippers and drayage truckers for storing their containers due to increasing congestion.

The public will have 30 days following its publishing in the federal register to respond to the proposal. The FMC is seeking detailed comments, with supporting data, on the following questions:


  • Has congestion created an emergency situation of a magnitude to have a substantial, adverse effect on the competitiveness and reliability of the international ocean transportation supply system?
  • Would an FMC emergency order alleviate the emergency situation?
  • What would be the appropriate scope of an emergency order?

According to the OSRA, information sharing required under an FMC-issued emergency order would be aimed at improving the efficient transportation, loading and unloading of cargo to or from any inland destination or point of origin, any vessel or any point on a wharf or terminal.

The law also states that such an order “must be tailored in terms of duration and geographic scope; consider the likely burdens on common carriers and marine terminal operators; and consider the likely benefits on congestion relating to the purposes of the Shipping Act.”

Click for more FreightWaves articles by John Gallagher.

5 Comments

  1. Leah Jordan

    =❤️= [ JOIN US ]
    I get paid more than 💰$100 to 💰$700 per HOUR for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily 💰$35000 from this…A. without having online working skills .. Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…

    COPY AND OPEN NOW………>>> 𝐰𝐰𝐰.𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐬𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐤.𝐜𝐨𝐦

  2. Tim

    “Emergency Orders” have a good bit to do
    with the world -wide employment & transportation MESS that we are in!
    More gov.is not the answer to too MUCH
    GOVERNMENT!

  3. Bill+Connor

    We are from the Government and are here to help …

    Get ready for more Chaos and Fees .

    This is not a simple clogged sewer pipe issue

  4. H. Howard

    A perfect solution. Order the carriers and terminals to do what they are already doing but now require additional documentation requirements so they can show the FMC they are in compliance. Yea, that will help the backlog.

Comments are closed.

John Gallagher

Based in Washington, D.C., John specializes in regulation and legislation affecting all sectors of freight transportation. He has covered rail, trucking and maritime issues since 1993 for a variety of publications based in the U.S. and the U.K. John began business reporting in 1993 at Broadcasting & Cable Magazine. He graduated from Florida State University majoring in English and business.