Watch Now


New FMC rule expands shippers’ eligibility for carrier refunds

Ocean carriers may be required to pay extra for illegally overcharging customers

FMC giving shippers better ability to recoup unfair charges on ocean carrier containers. (Photo: Jim Allen/FreightWaves)

WASHINGTON — A new rule requiring ocean carriers to refund importers and exporters for illegal overcharges and potentially for other violations of the U.S. Shipping Act will go into effect next month.

The changes, set out in a final rule scheduled to be published by the Federal Maritime Commission on Monday, are in the form of amendments to the FMC’s Rules of Practice and Procedure governing the assessment and collection of civil penalties. They codify provisions included in the Ocean Shipping Reform Act (OSRA) of 2022.

FMC’s rule explains that before OSRA 2022, any person violating the Shipping Act — or a regulation or order of the FMC issued under that law — is liable for a civil penalty.

OSRA 2022, however, changed the language in the Shipping Act governing potential liability of a violator by adding the phrase “or, in addition to or in lieu of a civil penalty, is liable for the refund of a charge.”


Accordingly, the rule states that “the commission may now order that a person is liable for ‘a civil penalty or, in addition to or in lieu of a civil penalty, is liable for the refund of a charge’ for any violation of the Shipping Act, commission regulations, or commission order.”

Customer refunds are also included in a new provision enacted by OSRA 2022 — section 4130 — that addresses the issue of charge complaints, such as inappropriately charging or overcharging for demurrage and detention.

“That provision specifies, among other things, that upon a finding by the commission that a carrier’s charges do not comply with the Shipping Act, the commission shall promptly order the refund of those charges paid,” the rule states.

Carriers now risk having to pay refunds to customers not only if invoices contain inaccurate information, but also if they do not include the following minimum information, as determined by the FMC:


  • Date that container is made available.
  • Port of discharge.
  • Container number.
  • Earliest return date (for export containers).
  • Number of allowed free-time days for holding containers.
  • Free time start and end dates.
  • Applicable detention or demurrage rule on which the daily rate is based.
  • Applicable rate or rates per the applicable rule.
  • Total amount due.
  • Contact information for questions or requests for mitigation of fees.
  • Statement that the charges are consistent with any of FMC rules with respect to detention and demurrage.
  • Statement that the common carrier’s performance did not cause or contribute to the underlying invoiced charges.

According to OSRA 2022, in determining the amount of a civil penalty or money refund to be paid by the carrier, the FMC will consider:

  • The nature, circumstances, extent and gravity of the violation committed.
  • The degree of culpability, history of prior offenses and the ability to pay.
  • The amount of any additional money to be paid by the carrier as ordered by the FMC.

Customers: Refunds not enough

While the change in the law is an improvement over the previous language in the Shipping Act, Peter Friedmann, who represents importers and exporters as executive director of the Agriculture Transportation Coalition, contends that it’s not strong enough.

“Just ordering a refund creates no disincentive to bad behavior,” Friedmann told FreightWaves. “A carrier can just charge the fee, and the worst that happens is they have to give it back. A refund is the obvious basic requirement, and then the Commission should impose a penalty. Without the penalty, there is little or rather, no disincentive for the carrier to cease imposing those charges.”

Friedmann added that tightening penalty provisions may have to be included in a new round of ocean shipping reforms currently being considered in Congress.

Click for more FreightWaves articles by John Gallagher.

One Comment

  1. Tracey Brown

    This reform act needs to cover the brokers & brokerage not paying the
    Carriers properly & withholding funds
    from them.
    Which is what’s going on most of the time. Thxs

Comments are closed.

John Gallagher

Based in Washington, D.C., John specializes in regulation and legislation affecting all sectors of freight transportation. He has covered rail, trucking and maritime issues since 1993 for a variety of publications based in the U.S. and the U.K. John began business reporting in 1993 at Broadcasting & Cable Magazine. He graduated from Florida State University majoring in English and business.