Houthi Red Sea stand down: ‘Seismic’ impact on shipping

Carriers’ Suez return could see ocean freight rates plunge

A Greek frigate escorts a CMA CGM container ship in the Red Sea in 2025. (Photo: European External Action Service)
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The Houthis have announced a pause in Red Sea attacks, linked to the Gaza ceasefire, raising hopes for a return of container shipping to the Suez Canal route.
  • Shipping carriers and insurers remain highly cautious, demanding significant and sustained assurances of safety beyond the Houthi statement before committing to a full return.
  • A large-scale return to the Red Sea would flood the market with capacity, likely causing global freight rates to plummet further and creating substantial disruption for carriers and shippers.
See a mistake? Contact us.

The Houthis have seen enough.

The tenuous Gaza ceasefire has led the Yemen-based militia to announce a pause in attacks on merchant vessels in the Red Sea, raising hopes for a return of large-scale container shipping to the Suez Canal trade route for the first time since 2023. 

The rebels, who control 40% of Yemen, communicated their intentions this week in a letter to Hamas, the Palestinian governing body in Gaza.

Expectations were further heightened at a recent summit of ocean carriers hosted by Suez Canal officials in Egypt. Waterway tolls have crashed as much as 60% as vessel operators divert the largest container ships and crude oil tankers away from the region and on longer, more expensive voyages around Africa’s Cape of Good Hope.

While the Gaza peace talks have seemingly accomplished what two years’ of U.S. military attacks on the Houthi failed to, analysts warn a return of global container shipping depends on assurances that will satisfy carriers – and their insurers. 

“Details are sketchy and you cannot base the safety of crews, ships and cargo on the word of Houthi militia,” said Peter Sand, chief analyst at shipping data platform Xeneta. “Carriers need far more assurance than that and, perhaps more importantly, so do insurance companies.”

Sand said that risk tolerance varies among carriers. CMA CGM of France, for example, stoked conspiracy theories in the shipping community when it continued to operate scheduled commercial services in the Red Sea despite ongoing Houthi violence. The liner further tested tolerances this month as the mega-capacity CMA CGM Zheng He and CMA CGM Benjamin Franklin transited the region, the largest vessels to ply the route since 2023.

Chart showing Suez Canal transits by carrier (and flag) in 2025. Maersk and MSC include services under contract to the U.S. government. (Alphaliner)

“Transits may start to increase if there is a perceived lower risk, but we are unlikely to see an imminent return to 2023 levels,” Sand said.

Xeneta estimates the longer routes around Africa currently absorb around 2 million twenty foot equivalent units (TEUs) of global container shipping capacity, increasing transport demands on the world fleet.

A full-fledged return to the Red Sea – a key trade route connecting Asia with  Europe, the Mediterranean and North America – would ease the stress on the ocean supply chain and potentially cause freight rates to plummet, unless carriers take drastic measures such as idling, scrapping, slow-steaming and blank sailings.

“Carriers now face a dilemma: Follow and accept the remaining security risks, or stay around the Cape and risk losing market share,” wrote Luuk de Gruijter, senior investments manager for APM Terminals, in a LinkedIn post. “If more carriers follow and the Red Sea fully reopens, capacity on the Asia-Europe trade will likely surge and freight rates could drop. Insurers will also be watching closely, with premiums staying elevated until multiple safe transits confirm stability.”

Vincent Clerc, chief executive of A.P. Moller-Maersk (MAERSK-B.CO), parent of APM and Maersk, on an earnings call said that his company must ensure that the Gaza ceasefire “is entrenched and stable”. He added that the shipping industry must assess the Houthis’ position to determine when it’s safe to begin Red Sea passages.

While container lines reaped billions in windfall profits on record demand in 2024, current economic uncertainty has weakened consumer confidence and tamped down industrial development.  

“Average spot rates from Far East to North Europe, Mediterranean and U.S. East Coast – three trades that would ordinarily transit the Red Sea – are all down more than 50% since the start of this year,” Sand said. “A largescale return of container ships to the Red Sea would flood the market with capacity and cause freight rates to plunge even lower across trades at a global level, not just those directly impacted by the diversions.”

He warned that carriers are heading into loss-making territory and freight rates are expected to fall up to 25% globally in 2026, Red Sea or no.

“Shippers should also be making contingency plans because a largescale return would cause severe disruption across global ocean supply chains as services transiting Suez Canal are reinstated.

“There are still many questions to be answered, but the impact of a largescale return would be seismic for shippers and carriers.”

Find more articles by Stuart Chirls here.

Related coverage:

Ocean rates tested by capacity conundrum

Container imports off 17.6% at leading US port

Freightos brand adopts Visa/Transcard payment financing tool

US suspends port fees on Chinese ships

Stuart Chirls

Stuart Chirls is a journalist who has covered the full breadth of railroads, intermodal, container shipping, ports, supply chain and logistics for Railway Age, the Journal of Commerce and IANA. He has also staffed at S&P, McGraw-Hill, United Business Media, Advance Media, Tribune Co., The New York Times Co., and worked in supply chain with BASF, the world's largest chemical producer. Reach him at stuartchirls@firecrown.com.