What is cargo insurance and why does it matter?

Recent trucking market conditions have made it harder for carriers to turn profits as carrier costs continue to rise, but rates are not following the same trend. Some carriers have had to take freight at a loss to keep trucks running.

When it comes to major expenses for carriers, the top four are fuel costs, truck/trailer lease payments, repair and maintenance, and insurance premiums. According to an American Transportation Research Institute survey that looked at 2023 costs compared to 2022 costs for carriers, truck insurance premiums were up 12.5% on average compared to 2022.

With insurance being a massive part of a carrier’s operating budget, it raises questions, like what exactly is carrier insurance, and what are the benefits and pitfalls of different policies?

Andrew Haun, SVP of Sales, Strategic Accounts at Reliance Partners said, “At its most basic form cargo insurance is insurance that protects goods or the property of others while being transported. Carriers need insurance because while the cargo is under their care, it’s their responsibility. For example a 10-unit trucking company could be responsible for $1 million in property of others at any given time.” 

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration requires motor carriers to hold a minimum of $750,000 of liability insurance, which isn’t applicable to cargo insurance, in order to attain authority to operate on the roads. Certain states have their own minimums for companies doing business or domiciles in the state.

The standard coverage form is perfect for most drivers, but there is a whole host of specialized insurance policies for different types of freight. Haun says, “[Specialized cargo] is generally covered under endorsement to the standard cargo coverage form. Many of these have additional liability requirements and equipment restrictions. Examples would be the following:

perishable goods, high-value items, hazardous materials, heavy machinery and equipment, oversize/overdimensional, live animals, bulk cargo, items hauled in dump trucks, specialized vehicles and moving operations.”

Insurance exists to protect everyone involved if there is an accident, damage or some other serious situation. When there isn’t insurance or a proper level of coverage in place, not only is that carrier, driver, shipper, receiver or broker on the hook financially, but it can also damage the reputation of a reliable and trusted carrier.

It may seem straightforward that carriers need to get carrier insurance, but there’s more to it than that. Where a carrier procures cargo insurance can matter as much as the actual valuation of the policy itself.

When it comes to where to get a policy and why it matters, Haun says, “I’d say that the number one thing is speed of claim adjustment. Making the broker whole so that the shipper/receiver is whole as soon as possible is generally the best course of action as maintaining a good relationship in this space is crucial to future benefit. Second is that the motor carrier isn’t coming out of pocket further to make any party whole. I find that a lot of young motor carriers do not value the total spend/coverage ratio enough. They often look for the best price as primary and coverage secondary. The whole reason you’re purchasing this coverage is so that you don’t have to fork out your own hard-earned dollars to make somebody whole.”

One claim for damaged cargo could be $100,000, a sum most carriers don’t have lying around. It’s a huge risk for a carrier to be expected to pay out a large sum of money and also repair any damage to the company’s own property on top of the claim payout. One claim could potentially wipe out a small to medium-size carrier.

Cargo theft is on the rise as well, and the increase in theft claims is one of the top reasons for insurance rate increases, compared to claims as a result of natural disasters or other issues. The problem has progressed so dramatically that it’s causing some insurers to exclude it from policies.

Haun adds: “Due to the increase in theft, many insurance carriers are excluding theft on their standard policy form. This is something that an agent should make the motor carrier aware of and should absolutely be recommended to be purchased back and added on to the policy. Most damages are covered under standard cargo forms, as long as the specific commodity exposures have been discussed, underwritten and included in the policy form. Every cargo policy should be tailored to each individual motor carrier.”

Not every carrier will have the same policy or the same requirements. For example, a carrier that hauls dry van cargo and heavy machinery will have different needs and policies than a carrier that hauls primarily dry van cargo. While there is a basic policy that can cover most carriers, it still isn’t a one-size-fits-all situation.

As for why natural disasters aren’t a bigger problem for carriers insurance, Haun says, “Natural disasters are another story. Due to the Carmack Amendment, which was introduced as part of the Interstate Commerce Act of 1906, the insured (motor carrier) is absolutely liable for all losses, except for 5 causes: act of god, public enemy, shipper error, quarantine, or inherent vice.”

Click here to learn more about Reliance Partners.

Lineage reports ‘strong’ Q3 in first quarter as public company

A refrigerated trailer docked at a Lineage warehouse

Cold storage warehouse operator Lineage Inc. reported financial results Wednesday for the first time since becoming a public company. The Novi, Michigan-based real estate investment trust posted a $543 million net loss, which included numerous expenses tied to the initial public offering. Excluding certain items, adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) increased 20% year over year to 90 cents per share.

“We are excited to report strong results for our first quarter as a public company, demonstrating our ability to perform well in various economic environments,” said President and CEO Greg Lehmkuhl in a news release. “Looking forward, we are well positioned to drive compounding growth, benefiting from our industry-leading real estate portfolio, innovative technology, and our strategic capital deployment engine.”

Lineage raised $5.1 billion in gross proceeds from its July IPO, which was the largest real estate IPO in history. It used $4.9 billion to pay down debt, giving it an investment-grade credit profile. It also implemented a quarterly dividend, which equals $2.11 per share on an annualized basis.

Table: Lineage’s key performance indicators

Net revenue of $1.34 billion increased 0.5% y/y. Physical occupancy was 77.6% in the quarter, 160 basis points worse y/y but flat with the second quarter. Total pallet throughput fell 1.7% y/y to 11.3 million but was also flat sequentially.

Lehmkuhl told analysts on a Wednesday call that customers are still seeing soft demand as food prices remain high, but most are expecting an eventual rebound.

Lineage (NASDAQ: LINE) issued full-year 2024 AFFO guidance of $3.16 to $3.20 per share. The guidance includes low-single-digit growth in same-store net operating income as it “controls the controllable” across expense lines.

The company also announced that on Friday it acquired ColdPoint Logistics for $223 million, expanding its footprint in the Kansas City, Missouri market. ColdPoint operates 21 million cubic feet of space.

Lineage manages more than 480 facilities with 3 billion cubic feet of space across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. It also provides freight forwarding, customs brokerage, drayage and truck transportation.

More FreightWaves articles by Todd Maiden

Trucking groups and others take renewed stab at tort reform in Texas

Texas’ trucking sector heralded the enactment of a law in 2021 as a big victory in its fight against nuclear verdicts, typified by a huge award against Werner Enterprises (NASDAQ: WERN) in the Lone Star State.

But just a few years later, the impact of the law, HB 19, is generally seen as a bust for the trucking industry’s attempts to fend off large judgments, whether or not they cross the $10 million nuclear verdict dividing line.

That disappointment has spurred a new effort to change the law that the industry believes became ineffective because of last-minute amendments added to the bill when it first passed.

A new vehicle for seeking changes in the bill has arisen in the creation of the Lone Star Economic Alliance (LSEA). Its launch was driven by Texans for Lawsuit Reform (TLR), which is not a new organization but has set up the LSEA specifically to seek tort reform through changes in HB 19, with trucking as a fulcrum in its efforts.

The individuals put forth by the LSEA to speak to the media about their efforts don’t solely include trucking executives, but they are prominent. That list included John Esparza, CEO of the Texas Trucking Association; Jerry Maldonado, chairman of the Laredo Motor Carriers Association and director of the Mexico and Laredo operations of Warren Transport; and Adam Blanchard, co-owner of Double Diamond Transport.

LSEA’s launch presentation doesn’t even mention trucking, except in the biographies of the board members with a connection to the new group.

So far, earlier changes haven’t helped

But sources close to the group, requesting anonymity, make it clear that the continued threat of nuclear verdicts in the state that were supposed to be reduced as a result of HB 19 brought trucking back into the battle as the key focus of LSEA’s efforts.

Discussions with those trucking executives, and a review of online commentary about the original attorney-written wording of HB 19, focused on the initial legislation’s “bifurcation” as the key to protecting trucking companies and other defendants from huge jury verdicts.

The bifurcation involves a concept known as the “admission rule.” It is described as a long-standing part of Texas common law, but as one attorney said, Texas judges have been ignoring it in recent years.

“It basically says that if I, as the employer, agree to accept responsibility for my employees’ actions that may have caused the injury, it is supposed to simplify the trial,” Lee Parsley, general counsel for TLR, told FreightWaves in describing the admission rule. The company being sued, in admitting that, is saying, “I’m on the hook for these damages,” Parsley said.

Admitting things helps, doesn’t hurt

While it may seem odd that such an upfront admission would be viewed by potential defendants as a positive, Parsley said it means “you don’t need to go down the rabbit hole of figuring out things like negligent hiring and negligent training. It’s supposed to simplify it so that in the trial, you’re just focused on who actually caused the accident and what the damages are at that point.”

In an online commentary about the bill after it passed, the law firm of Doyle & Seelbach quoted the key author of HB 19, State Rep. Jeff Leach, as saying it would “protect commercial vehicle operators from unjust and excessive lawsuits.”

While the interpretation of the law is complex, it boils down to the assumption that the admission rule would put a trucking company at risk for damages related to the actual injuries incurred by the plaintiff as a result of the accident that spurred the lawsuit, as long as the trucking company had made that admission.

Even if the admission is made, there still can be a second part of the trial to determine punitive damages, hence the term “bifurcation.” But under the rules of HB 19, the admission by the trucking company in the first part of the trial limits much of the discussion about its practices during the punitive portion of the trial, which would tend to limit how high the punitive damages might soar.

How would it have impacted big Werner verdict?

No discussion about nuclear verdicts in Texas gets very far without bringing in the Werner case. The truckload carrier is fighting a judgment that dates back to 2019 and was originally just under $90 million but now totals more than $100 million with interest. (The Werner case is on appeal before the state’s Supreme Court, which has accepted it for review.) 

The Werner case was decided well before HB 19 passed, so the law had no impact on the course of the trial. But Doyle & Seelbach discusses how differently the case might have gone had HB 19 been in effect. 

“A primary reason for the huge verdict was likely the trial court allowing plaintiffs to introduce company-wide evidence on practices spanning over a decade, including the company’s high turnover rate and extensive hiring of new and inexperienced drivers,” the law firm wrote. “If HB 19 had been in effect, the jury would likely not have heard this evidence during the first trial phase.”

Given that the crash in question in the Werner case involves a personal vehicle crossing a median and hitting a Werner truck head-on during an ice storm, Werner’s being able to invoke the admission rule would have kept some of that testimony about Werner practices out of the courtroom, according to Doyle & Seelbach. The goal of the law, according to the firm, “appears to be to limit the evidence to those violations that have some reasonable connection to the accident at issue.”

But according to the attorneys connected with the LSEA, amendments to the bill at the last minute created a “Frankenstein monster” that complicated HB 19 so much that, as Parsley said, “the defense lawyers don’t know how to use it.” As a result, he said, “they’re not using it and it hasn’t made the difference it should have.”

The goal of the LSEA, then, is to go into the Texas Legislature and remove some of those amendments that it sees as problematic. Many involve bringing federal trucking rules into the bill, and Parsley said the amendments had negatively impacted the admission rule’s elevation in HB 19.

On the other side of the divide might be the Texas Trial Lawyers Association.

Asked to comment on the LSEA’s efforts to alter HB 19, a spokesman noted that the group has not yet seen any specific legislation that would take such a step and that commenting would be “premature.”

“Regardless, we believe the safety of Texas drivers should be paramount as lawmakers are considering any proposed changes to the current law,” the spokesman said in an email to FreightWaves. “Our members routinely help Texans who have experienced horrific wrecks involving commercial vehicles. So, we look forward to working with members of the House and Senate to ensure Texas drivers are protected from bad actors who unsafely operate on our roads.”

More articles by John Kingston

Another nuclear verdict in trucking: $160M award against Daimler

Missouri court upholds nuclear verdict, blasts carrier’s safety practices

NFI’s Brown seeks dismissal of New Jersey case, cites minor role in dispute

Miami trucking company, 5 affiliates file for bankruptcy

This story has been updated to clarify that Star Transportation is still operating.

A Miami trucking company and its five affiliates with more than 400 drivers recently filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

Star Transportation PA Inc., doing business as Star Transportation of Miami, filed for bankruptcy protection on Friday in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida.

A day later, its five affiliated companies – Finance Solutions LLC, MDL Business Group LLC, Star Transportation A Inc., Star Truck Service Inc. and US Express Line LLC – also filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Star Transportation has 411 drivers and 233 power units, according to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s SAFER website, and remains in operation.

The company’s trucks had been inspected 507 times, and 103 had been placed out of service in a 24-month period, resulting in a 20% out-of-service rate. This is slightly lower than the industry’s national average of around 22.3%, according to FMCSA.

The trucking company’s drivers had been inspected 1,018 times over the same 24-month period, with 13 drivers being placed out of service, resulting in a 1.3% out-of-service rate. This is significantly lower than the national average of around 6.7%, according to FMCSA. 

In the past two years, the company’s trucks had been involved in three fatalities, five injury crashes and 24 tow-aways.

Its 23-page petition lists assets of up to $1 million and liabilities of between $10 million and $50 million. The petition lists the number of creditors as up to 99 and states that funds will be available for distribution to unsecured creditors.

The bankruptcy petitions, which seek to reorganize, list Victor Khramov as the president and 100% shareholder of all six entities.

Star Transportation and its entities are represented by bankruptcy attorney Joseph A. Pack of Pack Law in Miami. FreightWaves has reached out to Pack for comment.

On Sunday, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Corali Lopez-Castro granted Star Transportation and its affiliates’ emergency motion for joint administration of the Chapter 11 cases and to file a consolidated case management summary on an interim basis.

The court also approved the trucking companies’ motion to enter into a post-petition factoring agreement with RTS Financial Services, headquartered in Overland Park, Kansas, on an interim basis, to continue operating. Court documents stated that Star Transportation did not have “sufficient unencumbered cash or other assets to continue to operate their business during the Chapter 11 cases or to effectuate a reorganization absent interim approval of the proposed DIP facility.”

In a court filing, Khramov said the trucking industry has been in a state of distress for several years, but that “the situation in 2024 has reached unprecedented levels, with a cascade of negative trends creating a perfect storm of financial distress and widespread collapse.”

Khramov also blamed rising fuel costs, increased insurance claims, and the cost of maintaining and repairing trucks and trailers, which has skyrocketed, with some repair costs nearly triple what they were a few years ago, according to court documents. 

Khramov stated that he maintains a fleet of 219 trucks and 235 trailers, which include leased and owned equipment.

The move to file for Chapter 11 reorganization came after Star Transportation and its entities learned that one of its lenders had issued an order for the repossession of 47 of its financed trucks, according to court documents.

Star Transportation has until Nov. 12 to submit its top 20 largest unsecured creditors as well as its corporate ownership statement. The companies’ schedules of assets and liabilities along with its statement of financial affairs (SOFA) is due on Nov. 15. 

The decision to file for bankruptcy protection comes nearly a week after two former workers of Star Transportation filed a lawsuit in federal court, alleging that the trucking company and its entities misclassified workers as independent contractors instead of employees in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Click here for more articles by Clarissa Hawes.

Illinois carrier lays off most of its company drivers

Texas trucking company, affiliates file for bankruptcy liquidation

Texas logistics company with 500 truck drivers abruptly ceases operations

Texas logistics firm files for bankruptcy liquidation

Bookkeeper who embezzled from Iowa trucking company gets 2 years

A bookkeeper for an unidentified Iowa trucking company has been sentenced to two years in federal prison after pleading guilty to stealing more than $450,000 from her employer. 

The actual charge that Leann Marie Rouse pleaded guilty to was mail fraud. Two other charges in her original indictment were dismissed as part of the plea agreement. 

Rouse, 51, pleaded guilty in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa before her case could go to trial.

The trucking company is not identified by name in any of the legal documents connected to the case, except to note that it was located in Traer, Iowa, a small town about 60 miles northwest of Cedar Rapids. In the indictment of Rouse, handed down in March 2023, her employer is identified only as Company 1.

According to the indictment, the embezzlement started sometime in 2015 and continued through “at least” Aug. 20, 2020.

Rouse, according to the indictment, “issued unauthorized checks from [her employer’s] bank account, either depositing all or a portion of the unauthorized funds into her own personal bank account or taking in cash all or a portion of the unauthorized funds.”

The statement issued by the U.S. attorney on the sentencing said the amount stolen was $453,672.68.

Rouse, according to the indictment, was able to avoid detection for those five years “by issuing the unauthorized checks in her name and then using [the company’s] financial accounting software to reflect that the unauthorized funds were business expenditures related to various entities that did business with [the company.]”

Rouse has been free on bond and is to surrender to authorities for her prison term at an undisclosed date. After her two-year sentence is complete, she will be required to serve three years of supervised release, according to the U.S. attorney’s office.

More articles by John Kingston

TFI’s Bedard: Buying UPS’ LTL operations was not a mistake

Good news/bad news at Uber Freight: EBITDA loss widens but revenue improves

As Helene keeps key roads closed, Trimble’s routing service makes adjustments

Cargojet charter demand jumps 60% on e-commerce, supply chain delays

A Cargojet plane with dark blue tail seen from below as it approaches an airport.

Revenue at Canadian freighter operator Cargojet grew 14.8% during the third quarter from the prior year behind a wave of demand for charter flights from Chinese e-commerce sellers as well as businesses that diverted ocean and commercial passenger shipments to avoid potential delays from supply chain disruptions.

Cargojet (TSX: CJT) said total revenue was $176.6 million, with international charter revenue from customers paying an all-inclusive fixed fee per flight jumping 60% to $29.8 million despite one fewer operating day than last year. Charter revenue, both nonroutine and scheduled, grew more in absolute ($11.2 million) and percentage terms than from the airline’s overnight domestic network or dedicated contract flying for customers such as DHL Express. Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization increased 17.4% to $59.1 million.

Flight hours during the third quarter grew by nearly 15% with no change in fleet size. Cargojet operates 41 Boeing 757, 767-200 and 767-300 freighters converted from passenger configuration.

Co-CEO James Porteous said on Tuesday’s earnings call with analysts that increased charter business resulted from shippers seeking transport alternatives to ocean carriers and passenger aircraft because of capacity constraints caused by the Ukraine and Middle East conflicts, and fears of container backlogs from a port workers’ strike on the U.S. East Coast – which ultimately was short-lived. Cargojet has also increased the number of trans-Pacific flights operated on behalf of e-commerce logistics provider Greater Vision HK Express to five or six per week since service started in May. The number of frequencies will fall back to three again after the peak season.

Cargojet operates a domestic overnight network among 16 major Canadian cities, with space shared among a range of customers. The segment’s 5.2% revenue growth was attributed to increased e-commerce and B2B volumes, and inflation-adjusted rates for contractual customers.

“The improving interest rate environment and controlled inflation are fostering a more stable and optimistic economic outlook for Canada, which we believe bodes well for future domestic volumes,” Porteous added. The majority of customers have presented stronger volume forecasts for the current peak season leading up to the holidays. 

Cargojet incurred one-time startup costs for spare aircraft, maintenance, crew and ground handling in support of the extra charter bookings. New management hires, higher labor rates for pilots, overtime payments for pilots and spare parts costs, offset by depreciation of aircraft, also contributed to a 1.5% increase in overall expenses during the quarter.

The all-cargo carrier continues to invest in its fleet to capitalize on growth opportunities, which are greater in the wake of decisions this year by Air Canada to park two 767-300 freighters and WestJet to shut down its scheduled network after less than a year because of insufficient customer interest. WestJet has switched to a new business model that involves renting two of its four Boeing 737-800 narrowbody freighters to airlines and logistics companies that need dedicated capacity. FreightWaves previously reported that Cargojet has hired WestJet to operate its daily service between Newark International Airport in New Jersey and Bermuda. 

Two Boeing 767-300 freighters are currently undergoing conversion at an overhaul facility, with deliveries expected in the second and third quarters of 2025, Porteous said. One of the new aircraft will be used to replace a 767-200 on a lease that will expire in February. The other cargo jet likely will be reserved for new requests for e-commerce charters. Cargojet has also acquired two 767 passenger aircraft that could be sent for conversion as dictated by demand. 

Executive Chairman Ajay Virmani said Cargojet’s dominant position in Canada gives it more pricing power for charter service, but on international routes it isn’t able to charge as much because U.S. carriers such as FedEx, UPS, Atlas Air and Kalitta are also marketing their excess capacity.

Click here for more FreightWaves/American Shipper articles by Eric Kulisch.

Write to Eric Kulisch at ekulisch@www.freightwaves.com.

WestJet adopts new business model for freighter aircraft

MSC adds Florida port call

Swiss container line MSC announced that, to maintain schedule reliability, it will adjust the rotation of its United States to South America east coast service.

Port Everglades, Florida, will be reintroduced and the port of Navegantes, Brazil, will be replaced by the southern Brazil port of Itajai.

The new rotation will be New York – Norfolk, Virginia – Baltimore – Charleston, South Carolina – Savannah, Georgia – Port Everglades – Freeport, Bahamas – Cristobal, Panama – Santos, Brazil – Buenos Aires, Argentina – Montevideo, Uruguay – Rio Grande, Brazil – Itajai – Paranagua, Brazil – Santos – Rio de Janeiro – Salvador, Brazil – Colon/Cristobal, Panama – Freeport – New York.

The carrier currently calls Port Everglades as part of eight other services.

Find more articles by Stuart Chirls here.

Related coverage:

Lone container line undeterred by Red Sea attacks

Montreal port employers pressure striking union

China boosts Matson net

GXO Logistics sees ‘more normal’ freight market returning

GXO Logistics Inc. sees an upward trend in the global freight market in 2025, encouraged by its growing customer base and organic sales growth in the third quarter.

“We definitely are feeling that we’re out of the trough that we’ve been in for the last 12 months, and we’re getting back to a more normal kind of growth type of metric,” CEO Malcolm Wilson said during a call with analysts Tuesday. “We’re definitely building for a much stronger 2025.”

Greenwich, Connecticut-based GXO Logistics (NYSE: GXO) is one of the largest pure-play contract logistics providers in the world. It has more than 970 facilities totaling approximately 200 million square feet, with a global workforce of more than 130,000 people.

The company reported Monday that quarterly revenue surged 28% year over year to $3.16 billion.

Adjusted third-quarter earnings per share was 79 cents, compared with 69 cents for the third quarter in 2023.

The results exceeded Wall Street expectations for the quarter, which had estimated revenue of $3.03 billion and adjusted EPS at 78 cents per share.

GXO saw third-quarter organic revenue growth of 3%, which has accelerated sequentially throughout the year, said CFO Baris Oran.

Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization was $223 million, a 12% year-over-year increase compared with $200 million for the third quarter of 2023.

“The improving trajectory reflects the growing contribution of new facility startups each quarter, and we expect it to continue as we move into 2025,” Oran said. “We have also seen sequential margin expansion throughout the year, and we expect this trend to continue as we see a margin uplift due to a better space utilization in our multitenant network.”

For full-year 2024, GXO’s guidance expects organic revenue growth of 2% to 5%, adjusted EPS of $2.73 to $2.93 and adjusted EBITDA of $805 million to $835 million.

While revenue and earnings per share increased during the quarter, GXO’s net income fell 48% year over year to $35 million. The company also has $2.8 billion in outstanding debt and $2.2 billion in net debt.

GXO’s customers include Gymshark, LG Corp., L’Oreal and Zalando. The company recently expanded its partnership with Zalando and opened the largest outsourced e-commerce warehouse in France, Wilson said.

“Our sales pipeline has grown 30% year over year and now stands at over $2.4 billion of high-quality opportunities, its highest level in more than two years,” Wilson said.

The e-commerce marketplace drove significant third-quarter revenue gains, GXO officials said.

“There has been a return of a lot of e-fulfillment projects. I think that’s very pleasing for us to see,” Wilson said. “It was always one of the big engines of this company’s high-single-digit, double-digit organic growth. It’s great to see them starting to return now.”

GXO signed $226 million in new business contracts during the third quarter, bringing its year-to-date total to about $750 million. The company’s sales pipeline stands at its highest level in more than two years, officials said.

Kristine Kubacki, GXO’s chief strategy officer, said 60% of the company’s new sales in the third quarter originated from e-commerce fulfillment and companies looking to outsource their logistics operations.

“At an industry level, about a quarter of all retail sales today come from e-commerce, and this proportion is expected to grow by more than 10 percentage points over the next decade,” Kubacki said. “As supply chains become increasingly complex, customers are relying more and more on scaled tech-forward logistics experts like GXO. This has been driving an acceleration of outsourcing for fulfillment activities.”

Lone container line undeterred by Red Sea attacks

At least one major container carrier has continued to operate in the Red Sea despite a monthslong campaign of violent attacks on the key global shipping route that has forced other lines to divert around Africa.

French carrier CMA CGM has continued to operate a number of services through the Suez Canal with calls at Jeddah in Saudi Arabia, as well as south to the Gulf of Aden and destinations farther east including China.

Liner companies operating between Asia, the Mediterranean and the east coast of North America since earlier this year began diverting vessels away from the Red Sea after Houthi militia began attacking commercial shipping with missiles, drones and attack boats, killing four people and sinking two vessels. One ship was hijacked and its crew remain in captivity, and another remains detained by Iran.

The Houthi are a Muslim fundamentalist, anti-Israel militia backed by Iran that controls about 40% of Yemen. It claims to be attacking shipping from companies and countries aligned with Israel and began its campaign shortly after Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas terrorists killed 1,400 at an outdoor concert that precipitated an invasion of Gaza by Israel.

Container carriers have diverted vessels around the Cape of Good Hope in Africa, typically adding 14 days to their voyages. The longer sailings have meant delays, increased emissions and higher operating costs passed on to shippers, and several carriers have posted windfall profits in the process.

Since February, Eunavfor, the European Union’s naval force, has provided a defensive military armada escorting shipping in the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden and Indian Ocean.  

A search of vessel rotations on its website shows CMA CGM has been operating its BEX2 service between Asia and the Mediterranean through the Suez Canal, located at the north end of the Red Sea. A half-dozen vessels over the past several months have also made port calls in Red Sea service. 

The CMA CGM Pelleas calls Jeddah northbound on Nov. 28 on the India America Express (INDAMEX) on a Suez routing between India and ports on the U.S. East Coast. Future INDAMEX voyages are slated to use the Suez in both directions.

Other CMA CGM vessels and rotations operating in the Red Sea:

  • The CMA CGM Rossini departed Algeciras, Spain, Oct. 4 in the French Asia Line 1 service to Shekou, China, transiting the Suez Canal to the Red Sea to call Jeddah Oct. 15 and continuing on to Jebel Ali Oct. 28 and Khalifa, United Arab Emirates, last Thursday.
  • The CMA CGM Jules Verne departed Qingdao, China, on Sept. 4  in the westbound Mediterranean Express Service and called Jeddah on Oct. 25 before transiting the Suez and terminating in Malta on Saturday. The ship is scheduled to return on the same service later this month.
  • On the Europe India Pakistan Consortium service, the CMA CGM Pegasus called Jeddah Oct. 25 and continued north through the Suez to terminate at Tanger Med, Morocco.
  • The Levant Middle East Express (LMX) between the Mideast and Mediterranean shows all transits through the Suez. The CMA CGM Navegantes called Jeddah on Thursday on its return to Jebel Ali.

The voyage information was first reported by shipping consultant Lars Andersen and verified through CMA CGM’s website.

CMA CGM had suffered previous attacks on its vessels. The Groton was attacked by a drone Aug. 3, setting some containers on fire. The ship was not hit in a subsequent attack Aug. 30. The Lobivia suffered fire damage when it was hit by a drone July 19. 

The company did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.

A Houthi spokesman in a statement posted Sunday to social media warned vessel operators doing business with Israel not to re-register ships in an effort to avoid attacks.   

In a Mideast diplomatic mission for high-level discussions with government representatives, International Maritime Organization Secretary-General Arsenio Dominguez called for greater cooperation to end the attacks.

Find more articles by Stuart Chirls here.

Related coverage:

Montreal port employers pressure striking union

China boosts Matson net

Maersk Q3 profits rise despite modest container volume gains

Unlocking efficiency: How dedicated fleets drive success

In today’s evolving supply chain environment, shippers need to be reliable, scalable and flexible in order to thrive. Dedicated fleets allow companies to provide the top-notch service their customers want without the high levels of risk and investment involved in creating private fleets.

A good dedicated fleet is created through intentionality, collaboration and choosing the right carrier partner. Jim Waszak, SVP of dedicated services at Werner®, stressed the importance of shippers and carriers working together to create customized solutions. 

With more than three decades excelling in the dedicated space, Werner has built a reputation for superior service and is committed to understanding each client’s unique needs. 

Collaborative problem-solving

Addressing surface-level issues is no longer sufficient in the current logistics landscape. Waszak highlighted the importance of getting “intrusive” with clients’ supply chains to uncover underlying challenges and identify opportunities for growth. Open conversations and collaboration allow logistics providers to develop tailored solutions that genuinely meet client needs.

To provide those tailored, effective solutions, providers must be robust, dynamic and capable of change. Through continuous innovation – including the company’s new TMS – Werner continues to prove its commitment to being the kind of provider that can meet carriers where they are today and lead them into the future.

Data-driven solutions

As business challenges continue to evolve, logistics providers must adapt quickly. By leveraging state-of-the-art engineering and optimization teams, Werner works closely with client data to create dedicated solutions. This approach enables customers to manage fluctuations in demand more effectively.

By analyzing customer data, Werner’s state-of-the-art engineering team is able to know when a client’s transportation needs might ebb and flow. This allows them to bring in other segments of Werner – including intermodal, final mile and brokerage – to create multi-modal solutions that work consistently, not just when reality aligns with the status quo.

Safety first

Safety is a core value for Werner and is the driving force behind its operations and decisions. The company is dedicated to hiring top-tier professional drivers who align with its strong safety practices and contribute to an overall culture of safety within the organization. 

The safety-focused mindset is a protective factor for clients, as it reduces the risk of delays, damaged freight and potential litigation. This is especially true for clients moving away from managing their own private fleets in order to work with Werner.

Preparing for the future

As the logistics industry continues to evolve, providers must be prepared to adapt and grow alongside their clients. Werner is equipped to meet the demands of the future and create effective solutions tailored to their clients’ unique needs.

By fostering strong partnerships and embracing innovation, shippers and carriers can work together to make the supply chain more efficient and deliver a better experience for the end consumer.